Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T00:56:46.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iterated Ontogenies Reiterated - The Growth and Form of Modular Organisms. Proceedings of a Royal Society Discussion Meeting held on 27 and 28 June 1985. Organized and edited by J. L. Harper, F.R.S., B. R. Rosen, and J. White The Royal Society; London. 1986. First published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 313:1–250. - Modular Organisms. Case Studies of Growth and Form. Papers relating to a discussion on growth and form in modular organisms. Preface by J. L. Harper, F.R.S. First published in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 228:109–124.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Richard K. Grosberg
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Mark R. Patterson
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. Jr. (eds.). 1973. Animal Colonies, Development and Function through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross; Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Buss, L. W. 1982. Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 79:53375341.Google Scholar
Caswell, H. 1985. The evolutionary demography of clonal reproduction. Pp. 187224. In Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press; New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1966. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 12:1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P., and Connell, J. H. 1987. Population dynamics based on size or age? Some demographic consequences of partial mortality, fission, and fusion. American Naturalist 129:818829.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.). 1985. Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press; New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
McFadden, C. S. 1986. Colony fission increases particle capture efficiency of a soft coral: advantages of being a small colony. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 103:120.Google Scholar
Potts, D. C. 1984. Generation times and the Quaternary evolution of reef-building corals. Paleobiology 10:4858.Google Scholar
Rosen, B. R., and Larwood, G. (eds.). 1979. Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1985. Somatic mutations as an evolutionary force. Pp. 1930. In Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., and Slatkin, M. (eds.), Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitham, T. G., and Slobodchikoff, C. N. 1981. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49:287292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398411.Google Scholar