Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T12:39:54.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Butchering and marrow fracturing as a taphonomic factor in archaeological deposits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Nanna Noe-Nygaard
Nanna Noe-Nygaard*
Affiliation:
Institute of Historical Geology and Palaeontology, University of Copenhagen, ⊘ster Voldgade 10, DK-1350, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A major aim of the analysis of faunal remains from archaeological sites is the reconstruction of the palaeoecology of early man. Since taphonomic work must precede palaeoecological work, theories concerning the palaeoecology of early man would benefit from firmly based taphonomic studies of the archaeological deposits. One of the numerous taphonomic factors to be considered is the bone fragmentation produced by early man.

The degree of bone fragmentation in a deposit uninfluenced by human factors is an expression of the resistance of the various bones to mechanical and chemical decomposition before and during burial. Thus, the degree of fragmentation where human factors are predominant should provide an illustration of man as a taphonomic factor. In both cases the degree of fragmentation may be used as an indicator of the degree of taphonomic overprint.

Examination of bone material from four West European Mesolithic sites (all bog deposits), Star Carr 7200 ± 120 B.C., Kongemosen 6600 ± 100 B.C., Præstelyngen 3200 ± 100 B.C., and Muldbjerg I 2900 ± 80 B.C., reveals differences in marrow fracturing techniques. Furthermore, the different techniques result in different numbers of fragments for the same type of bone. Comparison of faunas from different sites based on the number of bone fragments must therefore be preceded by analysis of the marrow fracturing techniques used at the various sites. The number of fragments per estimated minimum number of individuals should indicate the degree of taphonomic loss.

The various types of marrow fracturing found seem to belong to cultures at different levels of technical development. Thus, it may be possible within a limited area such as northern Europe to establish a chronology using marrow fracturing type as one of the ecostratigraphic tools.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1977 , pp. 218 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, S. H. 1971. Ertebøllekulturens Harpuner. pp. 73–125. KUML årbog Jysk Arkæol. Selsk.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1975. The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages of Lake Rudolf, Kenya. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 146:473–578.Google Scholar
Clark, J., Beerbower, J. R., and Kietzke, K. K. 1967. Oligocene sedimentation, stratigraphy, paleoecology and paleoclimatology. Fieldiana Geol. Mem. 5:1–158.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1954. Excavations at Star Carr. 200 pp. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1972. Star Carr: a case in bioarchaeology. Module. 10:1–42.Google Scholar
Clason, A. T. 1967. Animal and man in Holland's past. J. B. Wolters; Groningen.Google Scholar
Clason, A. T. 1971. Some problems concerning stock-breeding and hunting after the band-ceramic north of the Alps. pp. 252–254. III Congrès International des Musées d'Agriculture. Rśumés (Budapest).Google Scholar
Clason, A. T. 1972. Some remarks on the use and presentation of archaeozoological data. Helinium. 12:140–153.Google Scholar
Clason, A. T. 1974. Archaeozoological research and the earliest stock-breeding in the Near East. The Eastern Archaeologist. 27:1–20.Google Scholar
Dodson, P. 1971. Sedimentology and taphonomy of the Oldman Formation (Campanian), Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta (Canada). Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 10:21–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efremov, I. A. 1940. Taphonomy, a new branch of paleontology. Pan-Amer. Geol. 74:81–93.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, W., Baum, H., and Dittrich, H. 1956. An Atlas of Animal Anatomy for Artists. 153 pp. Dover; New York.Google Scholar
Kubasiewicz, M. 1956. O metodyce badán wykopaliskowich szczatków kystynch zwierzecych. Materially zachodnio-pomorski. 2:235–244.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. R. 1968. Taphonomy and information in fossil communities. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 79:1315–1330.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. R. 1971. The nature and structure of paleoecology. J. Paleontol. 45:593–607.Google Scholar
Lyon, P. J. 1970. Differential bone destruction: An ethnographic example. Am. Antiq. 35:213–215.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1963. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. Band I. Allegemeine Grundlagen. 387 pp. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag; Jena.Google Scholar
Møhl, U. 1972. Animal bones from Itivnera, West Greenland. A reindeer hunting site of the Sarqaq culture. Meddr Grønland. 191 6:1–23.Google Scholar
Noe-Nygaard, N. 1969. Præstelyngen, en boplads i Åmosen. Palæoøkologisk undersøgelse. 307 pp. Unpublished prize dissertation. København Univ.Google Scholar
Noe-Nygaard, N. 1975a. Two shoulder blades with healed sessions from Star Carr. Proced. of the Prehistoric Soc. 41:10–16.Google Scholar
Noe-Nygaard, N. 1975b. Taphonomy in Archaeology with special emphasis on the role of marrow fracturing: 1–75. Unpublished . .Google Scholar
Payne, S. 1972. Partial recovery and sample bias: the result of some sieving experiments. pp. 49–64. In: Higgs, E. S., ed. Papers in Economic Prehistory. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I. and Brett, D. W. 1969. Fossilization processes. pp. 213–244. In: Eglinton, G. and Morphy, M. T. J., eds. Organic Geochemistry. Methods and Results. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sadek-Kooros, H. 1972. Primitive bone fracturing. A method of research. Am. Antiq. 37:369–382.Google Scholar
Sadek-Kooros, H. 1975. International fracturing of bone: description of criteria. pp. 139–141. In: Clason, A. T., ed. Archaeozoological Studies. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tauber, H. 1970. Danske kulstof 14-dateringer af arkæologiske prøver III. Årbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie. pp. 120–142.Google Scholar
Tauber, H. 1972. Radiocarbon chronology of the Danish Mesolithic and Neolithic. Antiquity. 46:106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troels-Smith, J. 1957. Muldbjerg-bopladsen. Naturens Verden. pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H.-P. 1971. Ein Beitrag zur Methodik der Wirtschaftshistorischen Auswertung von Tierknochenfunden aus Siedlungen. Publ. House Hung. Acad. Sci. pp. 391–395.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H.-P. 1973. Animal bone finds and economic archaeology: A critical study of ‘Osteo-Archaeological’ method. World Archaeology. 4(3)Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Contrib. Geol. Spec. Pap. 1:1–69.Google Scholar