Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:24:57.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Priorities for the conservation of mammals in the Peruvian Amazon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Richard E. Bodmer
Richard E. Bodmer
Affiliation:
Tropical Conservation and Development Program, Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida, 319 Grinter Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Setting priorities for wildlife conservation in the Peruvian Amazon must deal with a variety of issues, including subsistence and commercial hunting, loss of habitat from deforestation, and the international trade in wildlife and wildlife products. However, what is the rank of these priorities for wildlife conservation in Peruvian Amazonia? One way to evaluate priorities for wildlife conservation is by determining how different human activities affect the number of animals removed from the populations. This yields a measure of the impact of these activities on animal populations and enables wildlife managers to rank priorities for wildlife conservation efforts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1995

References

Bodmer, R.E. 1994. Susceptibility of mammals to over hunting in Amazonia. Proceedings of the International Wildlife Management Congress (in press).Google Scholar
Bodmer, R.E., Sowls, L.K. and Taber, A. 1993. Economic importance and human utilisation of tayassuids. In Pigs, Peccaries and Hippos: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (ed. Oliver, W.), pp. 29–36. IUCN, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bodmer, R.E., Fang, T.G., Moya, I.L. and Gill, R. 1994a. Managing wildlife to conserve Amazonian forests: population biology and economic considerations of game hunting. Biological Conservation, 67, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodmer, R.E., Puertas, P., Moya, I. L. and Fang, T.G. 1994b. Estado de las poblaciones del tapir en la Amazonia Peruana: En el camino de la extincion. Boletin de Lima (in press).Google Scholar
Bodmer, R.E., Puertas, P. and Fang, T.G. 1994c. The urgency of finding new directions for primate conservation in western Amazonia. Neotropical Primates, 2, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COREPASA. 1986. Plan Maestro de la Reserva Nacional Pacaya-Samiria. Editorial e Imprenta DESA, Loreto, Peru.Google Scholar
Dourojeanni, M.J. 1990. Amazonia ?Que Hacer? CETA, Iquitos, Peru.Google Scholar
Egoavil, E.O. 1992. Perfil Demografico de la Region Loreto. Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.Google Scholar
Gentry, A.H. 1988. Tree species richness of upper Amazonian forests. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 85, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, D. 1991. Kin saints and the forest: the study of Amazonian Caboclos in the middle Solimões Region. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Padoch, C. 1988. People of the floodplain and forest. In People of the Tropical Forest (eds Denslow, J. S. and Padoch, C.), pp. 127–141. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Proyecto Peruano, de Primatología. 1990. La Primatología en el Peru: Investigaciones Primatológícas. Propaceb, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Puertas, P. and Bodmer, R.E. 1993. Conservation of a high diversity primate assemblage. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapia, J., Encarnación, F., Aquino, R., Moya, L. and Soini, P. 1990. Censos poblacionales y saca periodicas de primates en la Amazonia Peruana (1976–1985). In La Primatologia en el Peru: Investigaciones Primatológicas (ed. de Primatología, Proyecto Peruano), pp. 325–341. Propaceb, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar