Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-85hf2 Total loading time: 0.53 Render date: 2021-09-26T20:21:26.696Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Distribution of grey wolves Canis lupus lupus in the Nepalese Himalaya: implications for conservation management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2016

Samundra Ambuhang Subba
Affiliation:
Conservation Science Unit, WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Anil Kumar Shrestha
Affiliation:
Conservation Science Unit, WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Kanchan Thapa*
Affiliation:
Conservation Science Unit, WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Sabita Malla
Affiliation:
Conservation Science Unit, WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Gokarna Jung Thapa
Affiliation:
Conservation Science Unit, WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Sujeet Shrestha
Affiliation:
WWF Nepal, Kanchenjunga Conservation Area Project, Taplejung, Nepal
Shrota Shrestha
Affiliation:
Kanchenjunga Conservation Area Project, Taplejung, Nepal
Naresh Subedi
Affiliation:
National Trust for Nature Conservation, Kumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal
Gopal Prakash Bhattarai
Affiliation:
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal
Richard Ottvall
Affiliation:
BirdLife, Morbylanga, Sweden
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail kanchan.thapa@wwfnepal.org
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The grey wolf Canis lupus lupus is Critically Endangered in Nepal, and is a protected species there. Understanding the species’ status and distribution is critical for its conservation in the Nepalese Himalaya. We assessed the distribution of the grey wolf in the Himalayan and Trans-Himalayan regions using data from faecal and camera trap surveys and published data sources. We recorded 40 instances of wolf presence. Using these data we estimated a distribution of 28,553 km2, which includes potential as well as known habitat and comprises 73% of the Nepalese Himalaya. There is evidence of recovery of the grey wolf population in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area in the eastern portion of the species’ range. A livestock insurance scheme has been shown to be a viable option to reduce retaliatory killing of wolves as a result of livestock depredation. The wolf plays an important ecological role in the Himalaya, and its conservation should not be delayed by the ongoing taxonomic debate about its subspecific status.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2016 

Wolves Canis lupus are resilient and intelligent predators that have adapted and flourished in a range of habitats, from the Arctic tundra to the Arabian deserts, yet they are locally extinct in parts of their former range (Mech & Boitani, Reference Mech and Boitani2010a). In Asia, wolves are distributed across central Asia from the Trans-Himalayan region of India, Nepal and Tibet to the northern parts of Mongolia and the Korean Peninsula (Pocock, Reference Pocock1941). The species is categorized as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List (Mech & Boitani, Reference Mech and Boitani2010b) but the subspecies Canis lupus lupus (hereafter referred to as the grey wolf) is categorized as Critically Endangered in Nepal and is included on the country's list of protected animals (GoN, 1973; Jnawali et al., Reference Jnawali, Baral, Lee, Acharya, Upadhyay and Pandey2011). Despite its Critically Endangered status, research on wolf biology in Nepal has been limited (Baral & Shaha, Reference Baral and Shaha2008; Jnawali et al., Reference Jnawali, Baral, Lee, Acharya, Upadhyay and Pandey2011), as have conservation efforts for the species in the Nepalese Himalaya. We studied grey wolf distribution in the region and refined the existing distributional map according to IUCN guidelines, on the basis of landscape characteristics and habitat types.

The Himalayan mountain range spans 1,500 km along an east–west axis, with three complexes: eastern, central and western (Fig. 1). The range encompasses 10 protected areas, two of which (Shey Phoksundo National Park and Annapurna Conservation Area) overlap with the Trans-Himalayan region. The altitudinal range of the protected areas is 2,500–8,848 m. The rugged, high mountain peaks are characterized by barren, subalpine and alpine vegetation, whereas the Trans-Himalayan region is a rain-shadow area with undulating alpine steppes, sparse scattered shrub and barren patches (Jackson, Reference Jackson1996). The major carnivores of the Himalaya are the snow leopard Panthera uncia, Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx and common leopard Panthera pardus, and the major prey species are blue sheep Pseudois nayaur, Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus, Tibetan antelope Pantholops hodgsonii, Tibetan gazelle Procapra picticaudata, argali Ovis ammon and kiang Equus kiang. The Tibetan community is the dominant ethnic group in the region.

Fig. 1 Potential habitat of the grey wolf Canis lupus lupus across the Nepalese Himalaya, modelled using the MaxEnt algorithm (Phillips et al., Reference Phillips, Anderson and Schapire2006).

We employed a multi-pronged approach to gather information on the spatial distribution of the grey wolf in the Nepalese Himalaya. We used camera trap data (Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Roe, Wangchuk and Hunter2005) from the Nepalese Government's flagship long-term monitoring programme, carried out during 2011–2015 in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area (c. 2,035 km2), genetic sequence data from opportunistic faecal surveys carried out in 2011 and 2014 across seven sites (c. 5,947 km2) in the western complex (Subba, Reference Subba2012; WWF, 2015), and published data on the occurrence (n = 8 occurrences) of the grey wolf in the central complex (Acharya & Ghimirey, Reference Acharya and Ghimirey2011; Jnawali et al., Reference Jnawali, Baral, Lee, Acharya, Upadhyay and Pandey2011; Chetri, Reference Chetri2014). We recorded two direct sightings, of three wolves, while surveying in Shey Phoksundo National Park (Subba, Reference Subba2012). We extracted bioclimatic variables (Hijmans et al., Reference Hijmans, Cameron, Parra, Jones and Jarvis2005; Phillips et al., Reference Phillips, Anderson and Schapire2006) for the spatial data on grey wolf presence to assess potential wolf habitat, and mapped a refined distribution across the Nepalese Himalaya using maximum entropy modelling in MaxEnt v. 3.3.1 (Phillips et al., Reference Phillips, Anderson and Schapire2006).

A total effort of 3,300 trap nights (Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Roe, Wangchuk and Hunter2005; Alexander et al., Reference Alexander, Cusack, Pengju, Kun and Riordan2016) and 154 km of transect surveys yielded 40 records (camera traps, 13; faecal samples, 24; direct sightings, 3) of grey wolves at five sites in the Himalaya (Table 1; Fig. 1; Supplementary Plates S1 & S2). Grey wolves were also recorded along the high plains bordering Tibet in the Upper Mustang of Annapurna Conservation Area (camera trap; Chetri, Reference Chetri2014), Manaslu Conservation Area (direct sighting), and Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve (Jnawali et al., Reference Jnawali, Baral, Lee, Acharya, Upadhyay and Pandey2011; Fig. 1). The altitudinal range of grey wolf presence was 3,616–4,950 m. Wolves were recorded primarily in barren areas (40%), followed by alpine grasslands (38%) and alpine shrublands (22%). Sixty-five percent of occurrences were recorded in the Trans-Himalayan region, with the remainder recorded in the Greater Himalayan region. We estimate there is 28,553 km2 of potential wolf habitat throughout the Nepalese Himalaya (c. 73%), based on the presence data modelled with bioclimatic variables in MaxEnt (Fig. 1). The model output had high discriminative ability (area under curve =0.973), and the most important contributor was the mean temperature of the coldest quarter (41.1%; Table 2).

Table 1 Records of grey wolf Canis lupus lupus (n = 40) from a survey conducted in the Nepalese Himalaya (Fig. 1) during 2011–2014, based on faecal samples, direct observation, and camera trap records.

Table 2 Relative contribution of bioclimatic variables (top five) to the MaxEnt model used to map the potential habitat of the grey wolf in the Nepalese Himalaya (Fig. 1).

This was the first extensive study of grey wolves as part of the Nepalese government's snow leopard monitoring programme, and has confirmed their occurrence in the Himalayan and Trans-Himalayan regions. Field observations and previous records indicate a preference for alpine grassland and barren ecosystems, similar to other carnivores such as the snow leopard, Eurasian lynx and common leopard, with distribution across various habitat types. However, wolf distribution in the Churia (Siwalikhs in India) and Lesser Himalaya is unknown.

Wolves were recorded in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area in 2014, whereas they were not recorded by camera-trap surveys there during 2010–2013, indicating that the species may be colonizing this area from Tibet. The subpopulation previously known in Sagarmatha has not been recorded recently (B. Shrestha, pers. comm.). During our preliminary investigation in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, local people were not supportive of conserving grey wolves as there is no compensation for livestock killed by wolves, as there is for snow leopards (Gurung et al., Reference Gurung, Thapa, Kunkel, Thapa, Kollmair and Műller-Boeker2011). Government guidelines for compensating for depredation of livestock did not originally include the grey wolf as a potential predator (GoN, 2012) but the species was added in the first amendment. However, in practice, compensation has not been provided, and therefore retaliatory killing of wolves as a result of human–wolf conflict is a threat to the long-term conservation of wolves in the Himalaya (WWF, 2014).

Another issue of relevance to wolf conservation is the ambiguous taxonomic status of Canis lupus in the Himalaya (Shrotriya et al., Reference Shrotriya, Lyngdoh and Habib2012). The wolves of Nepal are similar to Himalayan wolves of India, having similar morphological features and preferring similar ecological habitats, as evidenced by photographic records from camera traps (Supplementary Plate S2). Genetic studies in the Indian subcontinent have indicated that the wolf populations there are genetically unique, and a distinct species, the Himalayan wolf Canis himalayensis, has been proposed (Aggarwal et al., Reference Aggarwal, Kivisild, Ramadevi and Singh2007). However, the Himalayan wolf has not been categorized as a distinct species on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2015). Further analysis of genetic data (n = 21 samples) has shown evidence of both the Himalayan wolf (n = 8) and the Tibetan wolf Canis lupus chanco (n = 13; WWF, 2015). The taxonomic ambiguity of the Himalayan wolf is a subject for future research but the conservation of this predator should not be delayed until taxonomic issues are resolved using sophisticated techniques (Nowak, Reference Nowak, Wydeven, Van Deelen and Heske2009).

Multiple studies have highlighted conflict between people and snow leopards (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Jiang, Li, Guo, Da and Cui2008; Wegge et al., Reference Wegge, Shrestha and Flagstad2012) yet have failed to examine conflict with the snow leopard's co-predator, the grey wolf (Namgail et al., Reference Namgail, Fox and Bhatnagar2007; Jumabay-Uulu et al., Reference Jumabay-Uulu, Wegge, Mishra and Sharma2014). We have described the grey wolf's distribution across the Nepalese Himalaya, and identified potential retaliatory killing as a threat to the species’ survival. We recommend the establishment of a livestock insurance scheme and the effective implementation of the Government's guidelines for compensation, to discourage retaliatory killing. There is also a need for further investigation of wolf ecology, including its prey species, across the Himalayan landscape to inform action to ensure the long-term survival of this species.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation for granting permission to conduct this work, and protected area authorities, community institutions and local people for facilitating the research. We thank WWF UK, WWF US and USAID for funding the project. SAS is grateful to Lund University, the Rufford Small Grants Foundation and Lunds Djurskyddsfond for academic and financial support. We thank Dawa Gyangen Lama and Ang Phuri Sherpa for providing information on the grey wolf from Manaslu Conservation Area; Friends of Nature & Green Governance for conducting faecal surveys; Centre of Molecular Dynamics Nepal for the genetic laboratory work; and Marcella J. Kelly, Eric Wikramanayake and Shannon Barber Meyer for their comments on the manuscript.

Contributions

SAS, AKS and KT contributed equally to this article.

Biographical sketches

Samundra Subba is a wildlife researcher with a special interest in the ecology of terrestrial carnivores and their interaction with humans. Anil Shrestha's research focuses on mountain ecology and climate change. Kanchan Thapa is a conservation biologist with an interest in carnivore ecology and population dynamics. Sabita Malla is a wildlife biologist and has led research in Nepal's Terai. She has a special interest in carnivores and mega-herbivores. Gokarna Jung Thapa is a geographical information systems specialist whose research is focused on geospatial modelling. Sujeet Shrestha focuses on community engagement and biodiversity conservation. Shrota Shrestha focuses on community engagement. Naresh Subedi works on biodiversity research and monitoring programmes in Nepal. Gopal Prakash Bhattarai is an ecologist and is interested in biodiversity conservation. Richard Ottvall’s research is focused on carnivore ecology.

Footnotes

Supplementary material for this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000296.

References

Acharya, R. & Ghimirey, R. (2011) Grey Wolf: Status, Threats and Ethno-Wolf Relation in Annapurna Conservation Area (ACAP). Friends of Nature, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, R.K., Kivisild, T., Ramadevi, J. & Singh, L. (2007) Mitochondrial DNA coding region sequences support the phylogenetic distinction of two Indian wolf species. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 45, 163172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J.S., Cusack, J.J., Pengju, C., Kun, S. & Riordan, P. (2016) Conservation of snow leopards: spill-over benefits for other carnivores? Oryx, 50, 239243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, H.S. & Shaha, K.B. (2008) Wild Mammals of Nepal. Himalayan Nature, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Chetri, M. (2014) Ecology and Conservation of the Wolves in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape of Nepal Himalayas. National Trust for Nature Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
GoN (1973) National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1973. Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
GoN (2012) Wildlife Damage Relief Guidelines 2012. Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Gurung, G.S., Thapa, K., Kunkel, K., Thapa, G.J., Kollmair, M. & Műller-Boeker, U. (2011) Enhancing herders’ livelihood and conserving the snow leopard in Nepal. Cat News, 55, 1721.Google Scholar
Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 19651978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2015) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2015-4. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/ [accessed 10 May 2016].Google Scholar
Jackson, R.M. (1996) Home range, movements and habitat use of snow leopard (Uncia uncia) in Nepal. PhD thesis. University of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
Jackson, R.M., Roe, J.D., Wangchuk, R. & Hunter, D.O. (2005) Surveying Snow Leopard Populations with Emphasis on Camera Trapping: A Handbook. The Snow Leopard Conservancy, Sonoma, USA.Google Scholar
Jnawali, S.R., Baral, H.S., Lee, S., Acharya, K.P., Upadhyay, G.P., Pandey, M. et al. (compilers) (2011) The Status of Nepal's Mammals: The National Red List Series. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Jumabay-Uulu, K., Wegge, P., Mishra, C. & Sharma, K. (2014) Large carnivores and low diversity of optimal prey: a comparison of the diets of snow leopards Panthera uncia and wolves Canis lupus in Sarychat-Ertash Reserve in Kyrgyzstan. Oryx, 48, 529535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mech, L.D. & Boitani, L. (2010a) Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Mech, L.D. & Boitani, L. (2010b) Canis lupus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T3746A10049204.en. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T3746A10049204.en [accessed 9 May 2016].Google Scholar
Namgail, T., Fox, J.L. & Bhatnagar, Y.V. (2007) Carnivore-caused livestock mortality in Trans-Himalaya. Environmental Management, 39, 490496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, R.M. (2009) Taxonomy, morphology and genetics of wolves in the Great Lakes region. In Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States (eds Wydeven, A.P., Van Deelen, T.R. & Heske, E.J.), pp. 233250. Springer, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. & Schapire, R.E. (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, R.I. (1941) The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma: Mammalia Vol. II. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.Google Scholar
Shrotriya, S., Lyngdoh, S. & Habib, B. (2012) Wolves in Trans-Himalayas: 165 years of taxonomic confusion. Current Science, 103, 885887.Google Scholar
Subba, S.A. (2012) Assessing the genetic status, distribution, prey selection and conservation issues of Himalayan wolf (Canis himalayensis) in Trans-Himalayan Dolpa, Nepal. MSc thesis. Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Wegge, P., Shrestha, R. & Flagstad, Ø. (2012) Snow leopard Panthera uncia predation on livestock and wild prey in a mountain valley in northern Nepal: implications for conservation management. Wildlife Biology, 18, 131141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WWF (2014) Assessment of Snow Leopard Status and Distribution in Humla and Bajhang Districts in Western Complex of Nepal. WWF Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
WWF (2015) Non-Invasive Genetic Population Survey of Snow Leopard and Wolf. Final report. WWF, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Xu, A., Jiang, Z., Li, C., Guo, J., Da, S., Cui, Q. et al. (2008) Status and conservation of the snow leopard Panthera uncia in the Gouli Region, Kunlun Mountains, China. Oryx, 42, 460463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Potential habitat of the grey wolf Canis lupus lupus across the Nepalese Himalaya, modelled using the MaxEnt algorithm (Phillips et al., 2006).

Figure 1

Table 1 Records of grey wolf Canis lupus lupus (n = 40) from a survey conducted in the Nepalese Himalaya (Fig. 1) during 2011–2014, based on faecal samples, direct observation, and camera trap records.

Figure 2

Table 2 Relative contribution of bioclimatic variables (top five) to the MaxEnt model used to map the potential habitat of the grey wolf in the Nepalese Himalaya (Fig. 1).

Supplementary material: PDF

Subba supplementary material

Plates S1 and S2

Download Subba supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 695 KB
You have Access
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Distribution of grey wolves Canis lupus lupus in the Nepalese Himalaya: implications for conservation management
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Distribution of grey wolves Canis lupus lupus in the Nepalese Himalaya: implications for conservation management
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Distribution of grey wolves Canis lupus lupus in the Nepalese Himalaya: implications for conservation management
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *