Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T13:36:08.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Disappearing Natterjack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Keith F. Corbett  and
Trevor J. C. Beebee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The natterjack toad is decreasing rapidly in Britain. This is particularly true of its largest population on the dunes of south-west Lancashire, where developments in the form of houses, roads and a holiday camp have deprived it of habitat. Even more serious, say the authors, who have made a survey of this toad in Britain for WWF, is the drying out of the dune slacks, the freshwater pools where the natterjacks breed, as a result of the lowering of the water table by drainage and abstraction. The artificial substitutes provided so far are not adqeuate and the authors urge the need to create large and suitable breeding pools for the toads.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 1975 , pp. 47 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1975

References

1. Beebee, T.J.C. 1975. The Natterjack toad in Britain; a study of past and present status. Brit. J. Herpetol. (in press).Google Scholar
2Taylor, R.H.R. 1948 Distribution of the British Reptiles and Amphibia, with notes on species recently introduced. Brit. J. Herpetol., 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
3Hardy, E. 1939 A rare toad (natterjack). Field, 174, 415.Google Scholar
4Prestt, I., Cooke, A.S. and Corbett, K.F. 1974 The British Amphibians and Reptiles, in: Systematic Association Special Volume No. 6, The Changing Fauna and Flora of Britain. Ed. Hawksworth, D. L.; Academic Press, London, pp. 229–254.Google Scholar
5Smith, P.H., Harris, J.I. and Hancock, E.G. 1974 The Natterjack Toad in Southwest Lancashire, 1972. Nature in Lancashire, 4, 44.Google Scholar