Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:37:44.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UPISketch: The UPIC idea and its current applications for initiating new audiences to music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Rodolphe Bourotte*
Affiliation:
Centre Iannis Xenakis, c/o Groupe de Recherche d’Histoire (GRHIS), UFR Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Rouen, Rue Lavoisier, F. 76821 Mont Saint AIgnan Cedex, France
Sharon Kanach*
Affiliation:
Centre Iannis Xenakis, c/o Groupe de Recherche d’Histoire (GRHIS), UFR Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Rouen, Rue Lavoisier, F. 76821 Mont Saint AIgnan Cedex, France

Abstract

With the invention of UPIC by Iannis Xenakis in 1977, for the first time one could achieve the sonic realisation of drawn musical ideas by a computer. Since then, no one seems to have proposed an equivalent tool, providing usability for both beginners and professionals. We will discuss how lively the UPIC idea can still be today, and why we should pay attention to this approach. Indeed, there has been a relative quietness in the domain of computer music specifically regarding how we arrange graphical curves to describe the evolution of sound parameters and create a musical form. This ascertainment led to the birth of our project UPISketch, which aims at the same goal, using today’s technology. We hope that this first version can reintroduce the concept of a ‘computer-assisted tool for sound composition, assisted by drawing’ to a global audience. The program being available since June 2018, we will evaluate the results of the first workshops with various publics and take a glimpse at the next developments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bourotte, R. and Delhaye, C. 2013. Learn to Think for Yourself: Impelled by UPIC to Open New Ways of Composing. Organised Sound 18(2): 134–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Després, A. Forthcoming 2019. Towards a Pedagogy of Creativity. In Brümmer, L. and Kanach, S. (eds.) From Xenakis’s UPIC to Graphic Notation Today. Karlsruhe: ZKM Books.Google Scholar
Duarte, Mario. 2018. Timbral and Spatial Interactive Systems in the Community: The Use of Electroacoustic Music in Education and Social Integration. Lecture presented at the conference Bringing New Music to New Audiences, De Montfort University, 21 September.Google Scholar
Harley, J. 2004. Xenakis: His Life in Music. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mâche, F.-B. 1993. Lettre adressée au Ateliers UPIC. CIX Archives: CIX 106, 1 p., 1er septembre.Google Scholar
Roads, Curtis. 2004. Microsound. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.and Grafton, A. 2013. Cartographies of Time: A History of the Timeline. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1979. Si Dieu existait, il serait bricoleur. Le Monde de la musique n°11, Paris, Mai, p. 96. (CIX Archives)Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1981. L’Avenir de l’UPIC, interview de Iannis Xenakis. Mp4. www.centre-iannis-xenakis.org/items/show/674 (accessed 13 February 2019).Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1996. Musique et originalité. Paris: Séguier.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. and Després, A., eds. 1982. Préface. Les Cahiers de l’arm n°4 : Informatique musicale et pédagogie autour de l’UPIC. CIX Archives: www.centre-iannis-xenakis.org/items/show/4112 (accessed 13 February 2019).Google Scholar