Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T10:46:05.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unstable Structure: The improvising modular synthesiser

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Alex White
Alex White*
Affiliation:
PhD candidate, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
*
Email: alexander.e.white@student.uts.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The desire to work in real time and improvise with the possibilities of tape-based studio practice was a key design intention of early modular synthesisers. The resulting instruments, in particular the Buchla, emphasised possibilities for the creation of musical structure in combination with components designed to enable real-time, expressive interaction. As smaller, keyboard-based synthesiser instruments achieved broad commercial success, many of the possibilities for the real-time creation and manipulation of musical structures, developed in the larger modular synthesiser designs, were not carried forward into the new age of commercial electronic music instruments. The resurgence of the modular synthesiser has seen these possibilities for improvisation of musical structures revisited, opening up processes and approaches that were almost lost to a new generation. Following an analysis of the genesis of modular synthesisers, with a focus on the Buchla, this article describes three examples of modular synthesiser-based compositional processes that enable the performer to undertake improvised actions in real time that construct, influence and distort musical structure. These examples are then analysed to better understand the processes, motivations and experiences of using a modular synthesiser to construct musical structure in a real-time and improvised fashion.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 27 , Issue 2: The Sonic and the Electronic in Improvisation, Part 2 , August 2022 , pp. 182 - 192
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

4ms PEG. n.d. https://4mscompany.com/peg.php (accessed 12 May 2020).Google Scholar
4ms QCD. n.d. https://4mscompany.com/qcd.php (accessed 22 September 2020).Google Scholar
A-152 Voltage Addressed Switch. n.d. www.doepfer.de/a152.html (accessed 12 May 2020).Google Scholar
Ableton. n.d. Interview with modular synthesis guru Dieter Doepfer. www.ableton.com/en/blog/dieter-doepfer-completing-the-circuit/ (accessed 20 September 2020).Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. (ed.) 2008. The San Francisco Tape Music Center: 1960s Counterculture and the Avant-Garde, 1st edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bode, H. 1961. Sound Synthesizer Creates New Musical Effects. Electronics Magazine, December.Google Scholar
Cage, J. (ed.) 1969. Notations, 1st edn. New York: Something Else Press.Google Scholar
Chadabe, J. 1997. Electric Sound, The Past and Promise of Electronic Music. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cox, C. and Warner, D. (eds.) 2004. Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dalgleish, M. 2016. The Modular Synthesizer Divided: The Keyboard and its Discontents. eContact! 17(4). www.econtact.ca/17_4/dalgleish_keyboard.html (accessed 28 January 2019).Google Scholar
Disklavier. n.d. History of the Disklavier. https://disklavier.com/history-of-the-disklavier (accessed 18 March 2021).Google Scholar
Elsea, P. 2013. The Art and Technique of Electroacoustic Music. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions.Google Scholar
Expert, Sleepers. n.d. Expert Sleepers General CV. www.expert-sleepers.co.uk////generalcv.html (accessed 12 May 2020).Google Scholar
Friedlander, E. 2017. Don Buchla’s Modular Revolution, Remembered by Suzanne Ciani. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/59pm45/don-buchlas-modular-revolution-remembered-by-suzanne-ciani (accessed 9 August 2018).Google Scholar
Frosty. 2016. Encounters: Suzanne Ciani & Morton Subotnick. 24 June. https://daily.redbullmusicacademy.com/2016/06/encounters-suzanne-ciani-morton-subotnick (accessed 13 September 2020).Google Scholar
Gluck, B. 2012. Nurturing Young Composers: Morton Subotnick’s Late-1960s Studio in New York City. Computer Music Journal 36(1): 65–80.Google Scholar
Gordon, T. B. 2018. Bay Area Experimentalism: Music and Technology in the Long 1960s. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. 2010. Morton Subotnick’s Ghost Scores: Interaction and Performance with Music Technology. Master’s thesis, San Jose State University. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ (accessed 18 February 2019).Google Scholar
Hernandez, D. 2017. Music in the Age of Communication and Control. PhD thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. 2015. Electronic and Experimental Music, 5th edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holtzblatt, K. and Beyer, H. 2016. Contextual Design: Design for Life, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Holzer, D. 2011. Vague Terrain 19: Schematic as Score. web.archive.org/web/20150521032145/http://vagueterrain.net/journal19 (accessed 22 February 2019).Google Scholar
intellijel. n.d. Eurorack Modules. https://intellijel.com/shop/eurorack/ (accessed 12 May 2020).Google Scholar
Le Caine, H. 1956. Electronic Music. Proceedings of the IRE 44(4): 457–78.Google Scholar
Magnusson, T. 2019. Sonic Writing: Technologies of Material, Symbolic, and Signal Inscriptions. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Manning, P. 2013. Electronic and Computer Music, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, C. 2016. Unboxing the Buchla Model 100 | In The Muse: Performing Arts Blog. //blogs.loc.gov/music/2016/01/unboxing-the-buchla-model-100/ (accessed 4 May 2020).Google Scholar
Morton, D. 2006. Sound Recording: The Life Story of a Technology. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumma, G. 1964. An Electronic Music Studio for the Independent Composer. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 12(3): 240–4.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2015. Software for People. Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press.Google Scholar
ornament & crime. n.d. https://ornament-and-cri.me/ (accessed 22 September 2020).Google Scholar
Paradiso, J. A. 2017. The Modular Explosion-Deja Vu or Something New? Voltage Connect Conference, Berklee College of Music, Boston MA, 10–11 March.Google Scholar
Pinch, T. 2006. Voices in the Electronic Music Synthesizer: An Essay in Honor of Don Ihde. In Selinger, E. (ed.) Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde. New York: State University of New York Press, 49–66.Google Scholar
Pinch, T. and Trocco, F. 1998. The Social Construction of the Early Music Synthesizer. Icon 4: 9–31.Google Scholar
Pinch, T. and Trocco, F. 2004. Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, O. D. 1997. Interactions between composers and technology in the first decades of electronic music, 1948–1968. http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/179758 (accessed 2 October 2019).Google Scholar
Roads, C. 2004. Microsound, 1st edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roads, C. 2015. Composing Electronic Music: A New Aesthetic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roads, C. and Subotnick, M. 1988. Interview with Morton Subotnick. Computer Music Journal 12(1): 9–18.Google Scholar
Sapèl – Tamed Random Source. n.d. Frap Tools. https://frap.tools/products/sapel/ (accessed 4 May 2020).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, M. 1963. The Electronic Music Studio of the University of Toronto. Journal of Music Theory 7(1): 73–81.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shakmat, Modular. n.d. Bishop’s Miscellany. www.shakmatmodular.com/products/bm.html (accessed 5 May 2020).Google Scholar
Slater, D. 1998. Chaotic Sound Synthesis. Computer Music Journal 22(2): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, J. S. 2001. The Analogue Alternative: The Electronic Analogue Computer in Britain and the USA, 1930–1975, 1st edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thyer, B. 2011. The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Toop, D. 2016. Into the Maelstrom: Music, Improvisation and the Dream of Freedom: Before 1970. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Vail, M. 2000. Vintage Synthesizers: Pioneering Designers, Groundbreaking Instruments, Collecting Tips, Mutants of Technology, 2nd edn. San Francisco: Backbeat.Google Scholar
Vail, M. 2014. The Synthesizer: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding, Programming, Playing, and Recording the Ultimate Electronic Music Instrument. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, A. 2019. Analog Algorithms: Generative Composition in Modular Synthesis. Proceedings of the Australian Computer Music Association 2019, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar

Discography

White, A. 2020. Transductions. Room40. https://room40.bandcamp.com/album/transductions (accessed 12 May 2020).Google Scholar

Videography

Subotnick, M. 2020. Modular composition research interview. https://youtu.be/XNQCXn3lAuc (accessed 3 May 2020).Google Scholar
Subotnick: The First Buchla 100. 2017. www.youtube.com/watch?v=FktvuWA1ngc (accessed 3 May 2020).Google Scholar
Wiffen, Z. 2020. Modular composition research. https://youtu.be/SzQcREpDEkI.Google Scholar