Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:38:18.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Situated Composition in Emerging Mobile Sound Production Technologies and Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Samuel Thulin
Samuel Thulin*
Affiliation:
Centre for Mobilities Research, Department of Sociology, Bowland North, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YN
*
Email: samuel_thulin@yahoo.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of ‘situated composition’, examining it in relation to developments in mobile sound production technologies and practices. Situated composition draws attention to the specific circumstances in which sound production and compositional activity take place. With mobile devices and apps offering heightened mobility and ease-of-use, ways of working with sound increasingly may be undertaken in a wide range of contexts outside of controlled environments specifically designed for sound work such as studios. Situated composition emphasises the interconnections between the situation in which composition unfolds and the process of composition, approaching composition as inherently distributed and collaborative in multiple ways. This article begins by considering how to situate mobile audio production apps, then moves on to elaborate the concept of situated composition and investigate specific practices. Drawing primarily on interviews carried out with fourteen composers, sound artists, musicians and producers who use mobile devices and apps in their sound work, as well as on podcasts, forums and my own work as a sound artist, I identify seven approaches to using mobile interfaces, focusing particularly on practitioners’ relationships with the surroundings where compositional activity unfolds.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2017 , pp. 73 - 82
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bench, H. 2014. Gestural Choreographies: Embodied Disciplines and Digital Media. In S. Gopinath and J. Stanyek (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Music Studies, Volume 2 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boaz, C. 2013. iOS Music and You. Podcast Episode 6. http://iosmusicandyou.com/2013/02/14/ios-music-and-you-podcast-006-jinx-padlock-interview/ (accessed 3 March 2015).Google Scholar
Bogost, I. 2011. What is an App? A Shortened, Slang Application. www.bogost.com/blog/what_is_an_app.shtml (accessed 1 May 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, A. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bull, M. 2006. Investigating the Culture of Mobile Listening: From Walkman to iPod. In K. O’Hara and B. Brown (eds.) Consuming Music Together: Social and Collaborative Aspects of Music Consumption Technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chapman, O. 2009. The Icebreaker: Soundscape Works as Everyday Sound Art. Organised Sound 14(1): 83–88.Google Scholar
Clough, P. T. 2014. The Philosophical Carpentry of the App: Criticism and Practice. In P. Miller and S. Matviyenko (eds.) The Imaginary App. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, U. 1959. The Poetics of the Open Work. In C. Cox and D. Warner (eds.) Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Farías, I. and Wilkie, A. 2015. Studio Studies: Notes for a Research Programme. In I. Farías and A. Wilkie (eds.) Studio Studies: Operations, Topologies & Displacements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferraz, S. and Aldrovandi, L. 2000. Loop-interpolation-random & Gesture: Déjà Vu in Computer-aided Composition. Organised Sound 5(2): 81–84.Google Scholar
Franklin, U. 2004. The Real World of Technology, rev. edn. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, T. H., Hardikar, S., Demoucron, M., Niessen, M., Demey, M., Giot, O., Li, Y., Haynes, J.-D., Villringer, A. and Leman, M. 2013. Musical Agency Reduces Perceived Exertion During Strenuous Physical Performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(44): 17784–17789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, H. and Davis, K. 2013. The App Generation: How Today’s Youth Navigate Identity, Intimacy, and Imagination in a Digital World. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glǎveanu, V. P. 2014. Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. and Goodeve, T. 1999. How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Donna Haraway. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herber, N. 2008. The Composition-instrument: Emergence, Improvisation and Interaction in Games and New Media. In K. Collins (ed.) From Pac-Man to Pop Music: Interactive Audio in Games and New Media. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. 1979/1999. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (Twentieth-anniversary edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K. and Robison, A. J. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 2013. The Mobile Device: A New Folk Instrument? Organised Sound 18(3): 299–305.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 2015. The Carry Principle: Strategies for Mobile Music Practice. Wi: Journal of Mobile Media 9(2). http://wi.mobilities.ca/ (accessed 1 May 2016).Google Scholar
Keller, D., Lazzarini, V. and Pimenta, M. S. 2014. Ubiquitous Music. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Kirisits, N., Behrendt, F., Gaye, L. and Tanaka, A. 2008. Creative Interactions – The Mobile Music Workshops 2004–2008. Vienna: Di’Angewandte.Google Scholar
Lane, C. and Carlyle, A. 2013. In the Field: the Art of Field Recording. Devon: Uniformbooks.Google Scholar
Liegl, M. 2014. Nomadicity and the Care of Place – on the Aesthetic and Affective Organization of Space in Freelance Creative Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 23(2): 163–183.Google Scholar
Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McCartney, A. 1999. Sounding Places: Situated Conversations Through the Soundscape Work of Hildegard Westerkamp, Doctoral thesis, York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
McCartney, A. 2006. Gender, Genre and Electroacoustic Soundmaking Practices. Intersections: Canadian Journal of Music 26(2): 20–48.Google Scholar
McKinley, J. C. 2011. Bluebrain’s App Central Park (Listen to the Light). The New York Times, 7 December.Google Scholar
OED Online 2014. ‘composition, n.’ Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/ (accessed 6 September 2014).Google Scholar
Order, S. 2014. Mobile Music Production: Creativity in a Dichotomous Interface Paradigm. Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference. Swinburne University, Victoria 8–11 July.Google Scholar
Pinch, T. and Bijsterveld, K. 2003. ‘Should One Applaud’: Breaches and Boundaries in the Reception of New Technology in Music. Technology and Culture 44(3): 536–559.Google Scholar
Prior, N. 2008. OK COMPUTER: Mobility, Software and the Laptop Musician. Information, Communication & Society 11(7): 912–932.Google Scholar
Roell, C. H. 1989. The Piano in America, 1890–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1977. The Tuning of the World. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Slater, M. and Martin, A. 2012. A Conceptual Foundation for Understanding Musico-technological Creativity. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 5(1): 59–76.Google Scholar
Thibaud, J.-P. 2011. The Sensory Fabric of Urban Ambiances. The Senses and Society 6(2): 203–215.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2013. From Epistemology to Creativity: A Personal View. Journal of Sonic Studies 4(1). http://journal.sonicstudies.org/vol04/nr01/a02 (accessed 1 May 2016).Google Scholar