Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T21:31:36.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postcritical Listening: Political affordances in participatory sound art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2020

Vadim Keylin
Vadim Keylin*
Affiliation:
School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, Denmark
*
Email: vk@dada-avis.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article makes an argument for the postcritical treatment of the politics of sound art. Counterpointing an autoethnographic analysis of Kristina Kubisch’s Electrical Walks with Seth Kim-Cohen’s critical reading of the same work, I show how a critical position detached from the lived experience leaves behind a wealth of meanings necessary to understand the political potential of sound art. This gap, I argue, necessitates a ‘radical empiricist’ approach shifting the focus from the artistic intent to the lived experiences of the audience and the effects sound art may have on their lives. Drawing on autoethnographic and ethnographic accounts of Kaffe Matthews’s sonic bike rides and Benoît Maubrey Speaker Sculptures, as well as Rita Felski’s project of postcritical reading, I develop a theoretical framework for the politics of sound art based around the concept of affordance. The term ‘affordance’ in this context refers to the possibilities of political meaning or political action an artwork offers to the participants without imposing a particular interpretation on them. I finish by discussing three aspects of political affordances in sound art: meaning-making, uses of sound art and access to participation.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 25 , Issue 3: On Phonosophy , December 2020 , pp. 353 - 361
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anker, E. S. and Felski, R. 2017. Introduction. In Anker, E. S. and Felski, R. (eds.) Critique and Postcritique. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bala, S. 2018. The Gestures of Participatory Art. The Gestures of Participatory Art. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, C. and Kubisch, C. 2006. Invisible Cities: An Interview with Christina Kubisch. Cabinet. http://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/21/cox.php (accessed 21 July 2019).Google Scholar
DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNora, T. 2003. After Adorno: Rethinking Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNora, T. 2013. Music Asylums: Wellbeing Through Music in Everyday Life. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Felski, R. 2008. Uses of Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, R. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goehr, L. 1994. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groth, S. and Samson, K. 2017. Sound Art Situations. Organised Sound 22 (1): 101–11.10.1017/S1355771816000388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. 2015. The Passion for Music: A Sociology of Mediation. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hennion, A. 2016. From ANT to Pragmatism: A Journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI. New Literary History 47: 289–308.10.1353/nlh.2016.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1912. Essays in Radical Empiricism. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Keylin, V. 2019. Politics of Participation in Benoît Maubrey’s Speaker Sculptures. In Maubrey, B. (ed.) Sound Sculptures. Np: author,. 4–5.Google Scholar
Keylin, V. 2020. Crash, Boom, Bang: Affordances for Participation in Sound Art. SoundEffects 9 (1): 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Cohen, S. 2009. In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1994. On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge 3 (2): 29–64.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rethmann, P. 2013. Imagining Political Possibility in an Age of Late Liberalism and Cynical Reason. Reviews in Anthropology 42 (4): 227–42.10.1080/00938157.2013.844013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, D. 2013. The Work of Art in the World: Civic Agency and Public Humanities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822377122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, C. 2016. Sound Art/Street Life: Tracing the Social and Political Effects of Sound Installations in London. Journal of Sonic Studies, 11. www.researchcatalogue.net/view/234018/234019 (accessed 15 August 2019).Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2019. The Political Possibility of Sound: Fragments of Listening. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar