Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T20:36:50.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Materiality in Sound Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Asbjørn Blokkum Flø
Asbjørn Blokkum Flø*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Center for Technology in Music and the Arts (Notam), Sandakerveien 24D, Bygg F3, 0473 Oslo, Norway
*
*Email: asbjorn@asbjornflo.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the recent resurgence of kinetic sound art in light of the relationship between art and material. It does this by studying the history of mechanical musical instruments and kinetic art, the role of immateriality in the history of Western art, and the renewed focus on materiality in the arts. Materiality is key to understanding the resurgence of kinetics in sound art. The first part of this article studies the historical narratives of materiality in sound art, while the second part investigates materiality in my own works as more contemporary examples. Here the text turns to exploration of the material and acoustic properties of metal rods and plates, and suggests that direct contact with sound-producing objects provides opportunities for new art forms where the morphology of sound can be developed in dialogue with the physical objects and the surrounding space. By examining the underlying acoustic principles of rods and plates, we get a deeper understanding of the relationship between mathematical models and the actual sounding objects. Using the acoustic model with basic input parameters enables us to explore the timbral possibilities of the sound objects. This allows us to shape the spectrum of acoustic sound objects with great attention to detail, and makes models from spectromorphology relevant during the construction of the objects. The physical production of sound objects becomes both spectral composition and shaping of spatial objects. This highlights the importance of knowledge of both materials and acoustic principles, and questions the traditional perception of sound art and music as immaterial art forms.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 3: Sound and Kinetics: Performance, artistic aims and techniques in electroacoustic music and sound art , December 2018 , pp. 225 - 234
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Englund, E. J. 1971. Method and Apparatus for Recreating a Musical Performance. US Patent 3,604,299A filed 22 April 1970, and issued 14 September 1971.Google Scholar
Fichter, T. 2015. Earle Brown’s Calder Piece and Alexander Calder’s Chef d’orchestre. In A. Borchardt-Hume (ed.) Alexander Calder: Performing Sculpture. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
Fletcher, N. H. and Rossing, T. D. 2010. The Physics of Musical Instruments, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Flø, A. B. 2017. Harry Bertoia and Norway. Ballade, 13 March. www.ballade.no/sak/harry-bertoia-and-norway/ (accessed 15 March 2018).Google Scholar
Flø, A. B. and Wilmers, H. 2015a. The Intrinsic Value of Timbre in Doppelgänger. Proceedings of the 2015 International Computer Music Conference. Denton/San Francisco: ICMA.Google Scholar
Flø, A. B. and Wilmers, H. 2015b. Doppelgänger: A Solenoid-Based Large-Scale Sound Installation. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Baton Rouge: NIME.Google Scholar
Focke, A. 2011. Trimpin: Contraptions for Art and Sound. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, M. A. 1997. Preservation and MIDI Translation of the Pianocorder Music Library. Master’s thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Hemsley, J. D. C. 2005. Henry Bryceson (1832–1909) Organ-Builder and Early Work in the Application of Electricity to Organ actions. PhD thesis, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Hiller, S. 2003. ‘Truth’ and ‘Truth to Material’: Reflecting on the Sculptural Legacy of Henry Moore. In J. Beckett and F. Russell (eds.) Henry Moore: Critical Essays. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hopkin, B. 1991. Computer Control for Acoustic Instruments. Experimental Musical Instruments Journal 7(1): 1, 8–11.Google Scholar
Koetsier, T. 2001. On the Prehistory of Programmable Machines: Musical Automata, Looms, Calculators. Mechanism and Machine Theory 36: 589–603.Google Scholar
Lange-Berndt, P. 2015. Introduction. In P. Lange-Berndt (ed.) Documents of Contemporary Art: Material. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, and London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
Lehrman, P. 2012. Multiple Pianolas in Antheil’s Ballet Mécanique . Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Ann Arbor: NIME.Google Scholar
Leissa, A. W. 1969. Vibration of Plates. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Utilization, NASA.Google Scholar
Leitman, S. 2011. Trimpin: An Interview. Computer Music Journal 35(4): 12–27.Google Scholar
Lucier, A. C. 2011. Careful Listening is More Important than Making Sounds Happen: The Propagation of Sound in Space (1979). In C. Kelly (ed.) Documents of Contemporary Art: Sound . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, and London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
Maes, L., Raes, G.-W. and Rogers, T. 2011. The Man and Machine Robot Orchestra at Logos. Computer Music Journal 35(4): 28–48.Google Scholar
Maillet, J. 1974. Tape Activated Piano and Organ Player. US Patent 3,789,719A filed 28 August 1972, and issued 5 February 1974.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. and Reid, H. 2007. The Rise and Fall of Alexandria: Birthplace of the Modern World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Raes, G.-W. 1991. Autosax, an Automated Microtonal C-Melody Saxophone. http://logosfoundation.org/instrum_gwr/autosax.html (accessed 12 May 2018).Google Scholar
Raes, G.-W. 2018. Catalogue of Instruments and Automats. http://logosfoundation.org/godfried/instrum-god.html (accessed 12 May 2018).Google Scholar
Riddell, A. 1989. A Perspective on the Acoustic Piano as a Performance Medium Under Machine Control. Master’s thesis, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Riddell, A. 1990. A Meta-Action for the Grand Piano. Proceedings of the 1990 International Computer Music Conference. Glasgow/San Francisco: ICMA.Google Scholar
Rudi, J. 2003. Norge – et lydrike, Norway Remixed: A Sound Installation. Organised Sound 8(2): 151–155.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1996. Calders mobile (1949). In Calder. Stockholm: Moderna Museet.Google Scholar
Shin, N. 1992. Fluxing Music: Interview with Joe Jones. XEBEC SoundCulture Membership Magazine.Google Scholar
Singer, E., Feddersen, J., Redmon, C. and Bowen, B. 2004. Lemur’s Musical Robots. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Hamamatsu: NIME.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-Shapes. Organised Sound 2(2) 107–126.Google Scholar
Vincent, R. A. 1975. Electronic Player Piano with Record and Playback Feature. U.S. Patent 3,905,267A filed 4 February 1974, and issued 16 September 1975.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. 2001. Material. In K. Barck (ed.) Ästetische Grundbegriffe, Historisches Wörterbuch in 7 bänden, vol 3. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar

Videography

Molin, M. 2016. Wintergatan – Marble Machine (Music Instrument using 2000 Marbles). www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvUU8joBb1Q (accessed 12 May 2018).Google Scholar