Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:03:43.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological Psychology and the Electroacoustic Concert Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2011

James Andean
James Andean*
Affiliation:
Centre for Music & Technology, Sibelius Academy, PO Box 86, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
*
E-mail: jaandean@siba.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An application of ecological psychology, based on the work of James J. Gibson, to electroacoustic music would consider the listener in relationship with both the work and the environment, in a dynamic and mutually informing relationship. This perspective is applied to various electroacoustic concert paradigms, demonstrating a wide range of listening experiences; the implications for electroacoustic music as a genre are examined. Several qualities of acousmatic music are used to explore some potential limitations of Gibson's theories. Finally, some relative strengths and weaknesses of ecological psychology are considered, as well as some potentially fruitful cooperations with other, somewhat divergent, theoretical approaches.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Performance Ecosystems , August 2011 , pp. 125 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, S. 2007. Interpretation and Musical Signification in Acousmatic Listening. Organised Sound 12(2): 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R.G. 1971. Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Basanta, A. 2010. Syntax as Sign: The Use of Ecological Models within a Semiotic Approach to Electroacoustic Composition. Organised Sound 15(2): 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A., Still, A. 1989. Gibson's Theory of Direct Perception and the Problem of Cultural Relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(4): 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dashow, J. 1987. Sequence Symbols (1984). On New Computer Music. Mainz: Wergo, 2010–50.Google Scholar
Dashow, J. 2002. Looking into Sequence Symbols. In T. Licata (ed.), Electronic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007a. Living Electronic Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007b. Spaces, Rituals, Genres. In F. Barrière and C. Clozier (eds.), Current Approaches in Electroacoustic Music/Relationships Between the Creator and the Listener in Electroacoustic Music. Bourges: Mnémosyne.Google Scholar
Frengel, M. 2010. A Multidimensional Approach to Relationships Between Live and Non-Live Sources in Mixed Works. Organised Sound 15(2): 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G.P. 1990. The Ecological Perception Debate: An Affordance of the Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(4): 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, S. 1985. Film Narrative and the Structuralist Controversy. In P. Cook (ed.), The Cinema Book. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Kendall, G.S. 2010. Meaning in Electroacoustic Music and the Everyday Mind. Organised Sound 15(1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, S. 1984. Spectral Fusion, Spectral Parsing, and the Formation of Auditory Images. Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sanders, J.T. 1997. An Ontology of Affordances. Ecological Psychology 9(1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Christopher. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2001. Acoustic Communication. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Windsor, W.L. 1995. A Perceptual Approach to the Description and Analysis of Acousmatic Music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University.Google Scholar
Windsor, W.L. 2004. An Ecological Approach to Semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(2): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar