Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:22:33.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Materialist Conception of Sound as Thing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2019

Luc Döbereiner
Luc Döbereiner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics (IEM), Inffeldgasse 10/III, 8010 Graz, Austria
*
Email: luc.doebereiner@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a conception of sound as the material of artistic experimentation. It centres on a discussion of the nature of sound’s ontological status and aims to contribute to a new understanding of the role of materiality in artistic practices. A central point of discussion is Pierre Schaeffer’s notion of the sound object, which is critically examined. The phenomenological perspective that underlies the concept of the sound object depicts sound as an ideal unity constituted by a subject’s intentionality. Thus, it can barely grasp the physicality of sounds and their production or their reality beyond individual perception. This article aims to challenge the notion of the sound object as a purely perceptual phenomenon while trying to rethink experimentation as a practical form of thought that takes place through interacting with sonorous material. Against the background of recent object-oriented and materialist philosophical theories and by drawing on the Heideggerian concept of the thing and Gilbert Simondon’s theories of perception and individuation, this article strives to outline a conception of sound as a non-symbolic otherness. The proposed idea of thingness revolves around a morphogenetic conception of the becoming of sonorous forms that links their perception to their physicality.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 24 , Issue 2: Borrowing, Quotation, Sampling and Plundering , August 2019 , pp. 217 - 223
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W. 1997. Quasi Una Fantasia: Essays on Modern Music. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Brown, B. 2001. Thing Theory. Critical Inquiry 28(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chion, M. 2009. Guide to Sound Objects. Trans. J. Dack and C. North. https://monoskop.org/images/0/01/Chion_Michel_Guide_To_Sound_Objects_Pierre_Schaeffer_and_Musical_Research.pdf.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2011. Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism. Journal of Visual Culture 10(2): 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolar, M. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Relation of Language to Materials. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyers, T. 2012. Lacan and the Concept of the Real. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainge, G. 2013. Noise Matters: Towards an Ontology of Noise. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2005. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2002. Off the Beaten Track. Ed. and trans. J. Young and K. Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Y. 2016. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 2001. Logical Investigations, Volume 1. Trans. J. N. Findlay. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007. Against Soundscape. In Carlyle, A. (ed.) Autumn Leaves: Sound and the Environment in Artistic Practice. Paris: Double Entendre.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. 1993. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III: The Psychoses 1955–1956. Ed. Miller, J.-A., trans. R. Grigg. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2014. Gilbert Simondon: Causality, Ontogenesis and Technology. PhD thesis, University of the West of England, Bristol.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2007. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, H.-J. 2009. Epistemic Objects/Technical Objects. In Rheinberger, H.-J., Feest, U. and Abel, G. (eds.) Epistemic Objects. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2017. Treatise on Musical Objects: An Essay across Disciplines. Trans. J. Dack and C. North. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. 2014. Sound Object? Sound Event! Ideologies of Sound and the Biopolitics of Music. Soundscape: The Journal of Acoustic Ecology 13(1): 10–14.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2014. Gilbert Simondon’s Psychic and Collective Individuation: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Simondon, G. 1989. L’individuation psychique et collective. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-morphology and Structuring Processes. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Solomos, M. 2013. De la musique au son: L’émergence du son dans la musique des XIXe–XXIe siècles. Rennes: PU Rennes.Google Scholar
Szendy, P. 2016. Phantom Limbs: On Musical Bodies. Trans. W. Bishop. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Teruggi, D. 2007. Technology and Musique Concrète: The Technical Developments of the Groupe de Recherches Musicales and Their Implication in Musical Composition. Organised Sound 12(3): 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valéry, P. 2016. Collected Works of Paul Valery, Volume 14: Analects. Trans. S. Gilbert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wanke, R. 2017. The Emergence of an Ecstatic-Materialist Perspective as a Cross-Genre Tendency in Experimental Music. Organised Sound 22(3): 428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art, rev. edn. Ed. Emmerson, Simon. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar