Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:42:49.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ad-Hoc Aesthetics: Context-dependent composition strategies in music and sound art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2017

Marinos Koutsomichalis
Marinos Koutsomichalis*
Affiliation:
33 Paloumpioti Str, 11476 Athens, Greece
*
Email: me@marinoskoutsomichalis.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary trains of thought largely denounce hylomorphism and a series of dichotomies of the past in favour of rather hybrid, all-inclusive and non-anthropocentric schemata. Yet, the former seem to still pervade our understanding of music and sound art in several respects. For many, composition is a primarily abstract process, musical instruments and audio-related technologies are fixed material means, and artists are creative individuals who are solely and primarily responsible for the artworks they produce. In this article a series of ad hoc and context-dependent compositional traits are scrutinised, with reference to theory as well as to actual artistic practice (both historical and contemporary), and are shown to transcend such assumptions in more or less straightforward ways. In particular, a series of practices is examined that revolves around material inquiry, anti-optimality, and hybrid, reflexive or ‘meta’ interfaces. More, DIWO (Do It With Others) approaches to composition are discussed and shown to echo adhocracy and contextual dependency in various respects and by means of emergent autopoiesis. Certain slants to DIWO are finally examined with respect to a series of powerful (in the author’s opinion) metaphors, namely emergence, transience and post-selfhood.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2018 , pp. 12 - 19
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

5 dimensions. 2009. http://issuu.com/apo33/docs/5_dimensions_10_juin/11?e=6402316/10883424 (accessed 14 May 2016).Google Scholar
Albert, J. 2012. Improvisation as Tool and Intention: Organizational Practices in Laptop Orchestras and their Effect on Personal Musical Approaches. Critical Studies in Improvisation/Études critiques en improvisation 8 (1). www.criticalimprov.com/article/view/1558/2685 (accessed 20 November 2017).Google Scholar
Batty, R. 2010. Buried in Sound. Musique Machine. www.musiquemachine.com/articles/articles_template.php?id=160 (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Bourriaud, N., Pleasance, S., Woods, F. and Copeland, M. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. and Archer, P. 2005. Not Hyper, Not Meta, Not Cyber but Infra-instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. and Villar, N. 2006. Creating Ad Hoc Instruments With Pin&Play&Perform. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Paris: IRCAM Centre Pompidou.Google Scholar
Cisneros, R. J. 2015. Hyperobject. Vivapunani. http://vivapunani.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Hyperobject (accessed 12 May 2016).Google Scholar
Cobussen, M. 2007. The Trojan Horse: Epistemological Explorations Concerning Practice Based Research. Dutch Journal of Music Theory 12: 18–33.Google Scholar
Drever, J. L. 2009. Soundwalking: Aural Excursions into the Everyday. In J. Saunders (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Experimental Music. Burlington, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1996. Theoreticians, Artists and Artisans. Leonardo 29(1): 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayling, C. 1993. Research in Art and Design. London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
Fiebrink, R., Cook, P., Smallwood, S., Trueman, D. and Wang, G. 2009. Laptop Orchestras and Machine Learning in Real-time Music Performance. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 Workshop on Computational Creativity Support. Boston.Google Scholar
Goriunova, O. 2012. Art Platforms and Cultural Production on the Internet. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. 2010. Silly Citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 233–248.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. 2014. The Maker Movement Manifesto. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. 2014. Speculative Aesthetics and Object-Oriented Inquiry (ooi). Speculations V: 158–179.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ikoniadou, E. 2014. The Rhythmic Event: Art, Media, and the Sonic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, K., Parkinson, A. and Tanaka, A. 2013. Workshopping Participation in Music. Organised Sound 18(3): 282–291.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 2000. Music and the Internet. Popular Music 19: 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2010. Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics. Ancient Philosophy 30(1): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsomichalis, M. 2015. A Hypermedia and Project-based Approach to Music, Sound and Media Art. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester.Google Scholar
Koutsomichalis, M. 2016. Catalogue Æsthetics: Database in and as Music. In P. Kostagiolas, K. Martzoukou and C. Lavranos (eds.) Trends in Music Information Seeking, Behavior, and Retrieval for Creativity. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.Google Scholar
Koutsomichalis, M. and Rodousakis, N. 2015. From (Not-)Doing-It-Yourself to Doing-It-(Cheaper)-With-Others: The Rise of a Workshop Culture in the Greek Economic Dystopia. In I. Theona and D. Charitos (eds.) Proceedings of the Hybrid City 3d International Conference. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. 2010. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. Reykjavik, Iceland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. 2005. The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate. In C. Gosden, E. DeMarrais and C. Renfrew (eds.) Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. 2008. At the Potter’s Wheel: An Argument for Material Agency. In C. Knappett and L. Malafouris (eds.) Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer US.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manning, G. 2013. The History of ‘Hylomorphism’. Journal of the History of Ideas 74(2): 173–187.Google Scholar
Manovich, L. 2009. The Practice of Everyday (Media) Life: From Mass Consumption to Mass Cultural Production. Critical Inquiry 35(2): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Medea Electronique. 2013. Koumaria Residency: A Fleeting Collective Experience (in Greek). Creativity Conference: Open & Economically Sustainable Models of Creative Production. Athens: Greek National Documentation Center.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. 1986. Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Nahm, M. C. 1956. The Artist as Creator, an Essay of Human Freedom. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Narušytė, A. 2010. The Aesthetics of Boredom: Lithuanian Photography 1980–1990. Lithuania: VDA leidykla.Google Scholar
Novak, D. 2013. Japanoise: Music at the Edge of Circulation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. 2010. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Priest, E. 2013. Boring Formless Nonsense: Experimental Music and the Aesthetics of Failure. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2013. Beyond DIY in Electronic Music. Organised Sound 18(3): 274–281.Google Scholar
Seo, H. 2003. The Shock of Boredom: The Aesthetics of Absence, Futility, and Bliss in Moving Images. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Serra, R. 1992. From the Yale Lecture. In C. Harrison and P. Wood (eds.) Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smallwood, S., Trueman, D., Cook, P. R. and Wang, G. 2008. Composing for Laptop Orchestra. Computer Music Journal 32(1): 9–25.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 2012. Telematic Composition. Doctoral diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A. and Tanenbaum, K. 2013. Democratizing Technology: Pleasure, Utility and Expressiveness in DIY and Maker Practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J. 2009. Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-generated Content. Media, Culture and Society 31(1): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. 1991. Making It Concrete: Before, During and After Breakdowns. Rev In Psychopathologie 4: 435–450.Google Scholar
Wang, G., Essl, G. and Penttinen, H. 2008. Do Mobile Phones Dream of Electric Orchestras. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Michigan: Michigan Publishing.Google Scholar
We have a situation. 2013. http://issuu.com/apo33/docs/whas-v11-web/23?e=6402316/5125267 (accesssed 14 May 2016).Google Scholar
Wikström, P. 2009. The Music Industry: Music in the Cloud. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 2014. Anti-Musicality: An Interview with Romain Perrot of VOMIR. http://thequietus.com/articles/16050-romain-perrot-vomir-interview-harsh-noise-wall (accessed 12 May 2016).Google Scholar
Williamson, J. and Cloonan, M. 2007. Rethinking the Music Industry. Popular Music 26(02): 305–322.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Hacker, P. and Schulte, J. 2010. Philosophical Investigations. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. 2011. Design Research Through Practice. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar