Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:15:04.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tor A. Åfarli: The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 7. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1992.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Liliane Haegeman
Liliane Haegeman
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , June 1994 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, M., Johnson, K. & Roberts, I. 1989. Passive Arguments Raised. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 219–251.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. 1988. The Case of Unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Tellier.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. 1993. Case Checking and Clitic Placement. Ms. Geneva.Google Scholar
Cresti, D. 1993. Partitives and Existentials. Paper presented at the syntax workshop 9.6.1993. Geneva. Certificat de Spécialisation.Google Scholar
Engh, J. 1984. On the Development of the Complex Passive. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. 10. University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Friedemann, M.-A. and Siloni, T. 1993. Agro is not AGRP. GenGenP, 41–53.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1993. Object Clitics in West Flemish. GenGenP, 1–30.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. 1984. A GB Type Analysis of Complex Passives and Related Constructions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. 10. University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 587–622.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, B. 1991. Coreférence et référence disjointe: les deux pronoms en. Travaux de Linguistique 1.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, B. 1992. En et les épithètes anaphoriques. In de Rijck, L. Tasmpowski & Herts, A. Zribi (Eds), Mélanges Nicolas Ruwet. Gand: Communication and Cognition.Google Scholar
Lappin, S. & Shlonsky, U. 1993. Impersonal Passives. Linguistics 31, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J. Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Postal, P. N. 1969. On So-called Pronouns in English: In Reibel, D. and Schon, S. (eds), Modern Studies in English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rappaport, M. 1989. Resultatives. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics.Haifa.Google Scholar
Ritter, E. 1991. Evidence for Number as a Nominal Head. Paper delivered at the GLOW Colloquium, Leiden.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 1987. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, A. 1991. Functional Categories and Agreement. Linguistic Review 8, 353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, N. 1990. En et y: deux clitiques pronominaux antilogorphiques. Langages 97, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, T. 1984. Remarks on Complex Passives. In Brendemoen, B., Hovdhaugen, E. & Magga, O. H. (eds), Riepmocala, Essays in Honour of Knut Bergsland, pp. 153–164. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Vikner, S. 1991. Verb Movement and the Licensing of NP-positions in the Germanic Languages. 1990 Geneva diss.Google Scholar