Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T13:53:41.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pied-piping domains and adjunction coincide in Finnish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

Pauli Brattico
Pauli Brattico*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, PL35, 40014University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Pauli.Brattico@Helsinki.fi
Get access

Abstract

It is well-known that wh-pronouns may pied-pipe their containing host phrases as they move to their final scope positions. In Finnish, such pied-piping requires further that a wh-element is situated at the left edge of host phrases, a position in which it ends up either through base generation or through wh-movement. This article investigates which independent properties define such pied-piping domains. An empirical generalization will be defended according to which a phrase constitutes such pied-piping domain if and only if it is adjoinable. The hypothesis that pied-piping domains are islands is put into question. Secondary wh-movement, pied-piping and adjunction are thus intrinsically linked with each other.

Keywords

adjoinabilityadjunctionFinnishislandspied-pipingsecondary wh-movementwh-movement
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , May 2012 , pp. 71 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brattico, Pauli. 2012. Pied-piping, wh-movement and adjunction. Ms., University of Helsinki. [To appear in Biolinguistica Fennica Working Papers 3.]Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2008. Constituent Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos & Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. Ph.D. thesis, Tilburg University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2004. The syntax of time adverbial. In Guéron, Jacqueline & Lecarme, Jacqueline (eds.), The Syntax of Time, 143–179. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Fabian. 2004. A Theory of Pied-piping. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Heck, Fabian. 2008. On Pied-piping: Wh-movement and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Urpo, Nikanne. 2002. Expletives, subjects and topics in Finnish. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, 71–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhmarniemi, Saara. 2009. Extraction islands in Finnish. Biolinguistica Fennica Working Papers 1, 21–78.Google Scholar
Huhmarniemi, Saara. 2012a. Finnish A′-movement: Edges and Islands (Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Studies in Cognitive Science 2). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Huhmarniemi, Saara. 2012b. Optional pied-piping: Evidence from Finnish. Ms., University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1985. Bare-NP Adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16 (4), 595–621.Google Scholar
Manninen, Satu. 1999. Manner Adverbials and the Structure of Finnish Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1986. Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 2000. Illicit remnant movement: An argument for feature-driven movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toivonen, Ida. 1995. A study of Finnish infinitives. Bachelor thesis, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne. 1989. Deriving Syntactic Representations in Finnish. Ph.D dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria. 1995. Discourse configurationality in Finnish. In Kiss, Katalin É. (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, 244–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar