Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T01:31:44.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Lexical Distribution of Agent-preserving and Object-preserving Transitivity Alternations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Konstantin I. Kazenin
Konstantin I. Kazenin
Affiliation:
119021 Xolzunov pereulok 6–53 Moscow, Russia. Email kostya@logos.msu.su
Get access

Abstract

This article gives a cognitively based account of polysemous transitivity alternations, which are Agent-preserving with some verbs and Object-preserving with others. The data from three languages – Asiatic Eskimo, Boumaa Fijian and Bambara – are presented. It is argued that the mechanism of the distribution of the meanings of these TAs is semantic in nature and does not depend upon the coding technique used by a language.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 17 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY , December 1994 , pp. 141 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, P. 1981. A grammar of Diyari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergel'son, M. 1985. Sintaksis monopredikativnyx i polipredikativnyx konstrukcij $$$ν jazyke izolirujuščego tipa (na materiale bamana). Dissertation, Moscow.Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1990. Possible Verbs and Event Structure. Meanings and Prototypes. In Tsohadzidis, S. L. (ed). Studies in Linguistic Categorization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1988. A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, E. 1987. The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1987. Transitivity Alternations of the Anticausative Type. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universit.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1993. More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations. In Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M. (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. (Typological Studies in Language, 23.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulibali, A. 1992. Refleksivnye glagoly $$$v jazyke bamana. Dissertation, Moscow.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. & Munro, P. 1975. Passives and their Meaning. Language 51, 789–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. 1989. An Approach to Unaccusative Mismatches. NELS 19.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. 1992. The Lexical Semantics of Verbs of Motion: the Perspective from Unaccusativity. In Roca, I. (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar
Menovščikov, G. A. 1967. Grammatika jazyka aziatskix èskimosov. Moscow & Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Menovščikov, G. A. & Vaxtin, N. B. 1990. Eskimosskij jazyk: učebnoe posobie. Leningrad: Prosvešˇenie.Google Scholar
Polinskaja, M. 1986. Diffuznye glagoly v sintaksise èrgativnyx jazykov. Dissertation, Moscow.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1985. Passives and Related Constructions: a Prototype Analysis. Language 61, 821–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M. (ed) 1976. The Grammar of Causative Constructions. (Syntax and Semantics, 6.) New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra.Google Scholar
Xolodovič, A. (ed.) 1969. Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V. (ed.) 1981. Zalogovye konstrukcii v raznostrukturnyx jazykax. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vaxtin, N. 1981. Refleksiv v èskimosskom jazyke. In Xrakovskij, (ed.)Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1972. Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar