Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:47:57.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inga-Britt Persson: Connectionism. Language Production and Adult Aphasia: Elaboration of a Connectionist Framework for Lexical Processing and a Hypothesis of Agrammatic Aphasia. Commentationes Hurnanorum Literarum, 106. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki1995. 245 pp. - Anu Klippi: Conversation as an Achievement in Aphasics. Studia Fennica Linguistica, 6. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki1996. 214 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Elisabeth Ahlsén
Elisabeth Ahlsén
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University, S-41298 Göteborg, Sweden, Email eliza@ling.gu.se
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , June 1997 , pp. 111 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlsén, E. 1985. Discourse Patterns in Aphasia. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 5. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Ahlsen, E. 1996. Pragmatics and Aphasia - An Activity-based Approach. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 77. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Allwood, J. 1976. Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 2. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. & Brownell, H. 1982. The Semantic Deficit Hypothesis: Perceptual Parsing and Object Classification by Aphasic Patients. Brain & Language 15, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, E., Hillis, E. E., Rapp, B. C. & Romani, C. 1990. The Multiple Semantic Hypothesis: Multiple Confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology 7, 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, S. & Gurland, G. B. 1989. Applied Pragmatics in the Assessment of Aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language 10, 264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J. 1990. Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Hartley, L. 1992. Assessment of Functional Communication. Seminars in Speech and Language 13:4, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 1989. Current Developments in Conversation Analysis. In Roger, D. & Bull, P. (eds), Conversation. Clevedon, PA: Multilingual Matters, pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Penn, C. 1985. A Profile of Communicative Appropriateness: a Clinical Tool for the Assessment of Pragmatics. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 32, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. 1986. PDP Models and General Issues in Cognitive Science. In Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & the PDP Research Group: Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. Language 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar