Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:51:40.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Johan Brandtler, The Evaluability Hypothesis: The Syntax and Semantics of Polarity Item Licensing in Swedish (Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 71). Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, 2010. Pp. xii + 241.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2011

Elisabet Engdahl
Elisabet Engdahl*
Affiliation:
Department of Swedish, University of Gothenburg, Box 200, SE-405 30 Göteborg. elisabet.engdahl@svenska.gu.se
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , May 2011 , pp. 61 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as a (Non)veridical Dependency (Linguistik Aktuell 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Britta. 1999. Negative Polarity in Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johannesen, Janne Bondi. 2003. Negative polarity verbs in Norwegian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71, 33–73.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Lindstad, Arne Martinus. 1999. Issues in the syntax of negation and polarity in Norwegian: A minimalist analysis. Cand. philol. Thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 2008. The Edge feature on C. Ms., University of Lund.Google Scholar
Progovac, Liljana. 1994. Negative and Positive Polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska Akademiens grammatik [Grammar of the Swedish Academy]. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok.Google Scholar