Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:40:50.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is sclerophylly of Mediterranean evergreens an adaptation to drought?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1997

S. SALLEO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá di Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
A. NARDINI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá di Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
M. A. LO GULLO
Affiliation:
Istituto di Botanica, Università di Messina, Casella Postale 58, I-98166, Messina, S. Agata, Italy
Get access

Abstract

The potential role of sclerophylly (leaf hardness and rigidity) in the control of leaf dehydration and rehydration was investigated in two sclerophylls (Viburnum tinus and Ilex aquifolium) and two non-sclerophylls (Hedera helix ssp. helix and Sambucus nigra). After leaves were dehydrated in the pressure chamber, water transport from the apoplast (mainly consisting of xylem conduits and mechanical cells) to symplast was detected 15 min from pressure release, in terms of a spontaneous increase in leaf water potential (Ψ1). This Ψ1 increase was much larger in sclerophylls than in non-sclerophylls.

Positive pressures applied to leaves simulated the tensions developing in the leaf apoplast under water stress conditions, causing water to be expelled from leaf xylem conduits and mechanical cells and transferred to the leaf symplast, thus leading to symplast rehydration and to the consequent Ψ1 increase.

No correlation was found between the leaf modulus of elasticity at full turgor or the degree of sclerophylly (in terms of the ratio of leaf d. wt to surface area) and the characteristic rehydration time of the leaves, i.e. between the two main parameters expressing the rigidity of the leaf blade and the rate of leaf rehydration. However, when changes in Ψ1 were measured as a function of leaf water deficit (RWD), equal Ψ1s corresponded with larger RWDs during leaf rehydration than during leaf dehydration in the two non-sclerophylls. In particular, the two sclerophylls showed rehydration of their leaf apoplast and symplast completely and simultaneously. By contrast, the two non-sclerophylls showed a persisting water loss, localized, it is likely, in their xylem conduits and mechanical cells.

In other words, the two sclerophylls did not recover from water loss more rapidly than non-sclerophylls but they recovered from xylem cavitation more completely. The major elasticity of the cavitation strain shown by the two sclerophylls studied was interpreted as of advantage to plants subjected to diurnal large drops in Ψ1 followed by nocturnal recovery. This is the case in Mediterranean sclerophylls growing in areas characterized by high humidity of the air condensing on the soil at night. The same mechanism of cavitation recovery, however, would be useless in very xeric areas.

The hypothesis is advanced that sclerophylly of Mediterranean species may derive from similar anatomical structures developed in species formerly adapted to more humid environments which later migrated to more arid zones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)