No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reflections on the changing landscape of apologetics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
This essay investigates one aspect of the relationship between contemporary apologetics and cultural studies. It begins with a consideration of Avery Dulles’ famous History of Apologetics. While noting the many virtues of Dulles’ work, it critiques his lack of attention to the role of imagination, emotion, narrative, and personal testimony. The essay argues that Dulles’ work shows how constricted the study of apologetics has often been in comparison with its practice. The essay goes on to note recent developments in research into apologetics which have begun to apply recent philosophical and theological interest in narrative, imagination, and the emotions to this field. It explores the increasingly sophisticated conceptual apparatus available for this task, in particular the concepts of the Social Imaginary and the Overton Window. Finally, the essay attempts a dialogue with certain aspects of secular advocacy, in relation to the role of emotion in the public square. It concludes that the use of conceptual resources from other disciplines, and engagement in dialogue with secular advocacy, may be of benefit to apologetics.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2021 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Dulles, Avery, A History of Apologetics, 2nd ed. (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005)Google Scholar.
2 Dulles does give the occasional, brief nod to fictional works which contain an element of apologetics, C.S. Lewis's science fiction novels, for example, but very largely treats such works of the imagination as peripheral to his subject. See Dulles, History of Apologetics, p. 318.
3 Newman, John Henry, Newman's University Sermons: Fifteen sermons preached before the University of Oxford 1826-43, MacKinnon, Donald M. & Holmes, J. Derek, ed. (London: SPCK, 1970)Google Scholar, see, for example, p. 122. Newman, John Henry, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (Notre Dame, Ind; London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979)Google Scholar, see, for example, pp. 93-96, 106-111.
4 See, for example, Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Biographia Literaria; or, biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions (London: Rest Fenner, 1817)Google Scholar.
5 Among endless possible examples, one might cite: Nussbaum, Martha C., Love's knowledge essays on philosophy and literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar. Nussbaum, Martha C., Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Avis, Paul D. L., God and the creative imagination: metaphor, symbol, and myth in religion and theology (London ; New York: Routledge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Wynn, Mark, ‘Religion and the Revelation of Value: The Emotions as Sources of Religious Understanding’, in Bartel, T.W., ed., Comparative Theology: Essays for Keith Ward (London: SPCK, 2003)Google Scholar.
6 Rowan Williams, Series Introduction to the series ‘The Making of the Christian Imagination’, in Wood, Ralph C., Chesterton: the Nightmare Goodness of God (Waco, Tex.: Baylor University Press, 2011), pp. vii-ixGoogle Scholar.
7 Oliver O'Donovan, ‘Mapping the Terrain for Engagement on Human Sexuality,’ Covenant, the weblog of the Living Church Foundation. <https://livingchurch.org/covenant/2020/11/10/mapping-the-terrain-for-engagement-on-human-sexuality/> (accessed 20 April 2021). O'Donovan's words might be compared with the traditional Caribbean saying, ‘Who feels it, knows it;’ proverbial wisdom has accorded imagination and emotion roles in cognition for unnumbered years.
8 See Ordway, Holly, Apologetics and the Christian imagination: an integrated approach to defending the faith (Steubenville: Emmaus Road Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar.
9 See McGrath, Alister E., Narrative Apologetics: sharing the relevance, joy, and wonder of the Christian faith (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2019)Google Scholar.
10 Nussbaum, Martha, ‘Narrative Emotions: Beckett's Genealogy of Love’, in Nussbaum, Martha C., Love's knowledge: essays on philosophy and literature (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 286-313 (p. 287)Google Scholar.
11 Forrest, Benjamin K., Kirk, Josh Chatraw & McGrath, Alister E., ed., The history of apologetics: a biographical and methodological introduction (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic, 2020)Google Scholar. It is perhaps unsurprising that it should give less coverage to Catholic apologists than Dulles, yet, the Catholic critic might ask: if Jonathan Edwards is admitted under the heading of ‘Dogmatics as apologetics’, and William Lane Craig and Alvin Plantinga gain entrance as philosophical apologists, what of Karol Wojtyla and Joseph Ratzinger?
12 Taylor, Charles, Modern Social Imaginaries (Duke University Press, 2003), pp. 23-30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Ward, Graham, ‘History, Belief and Imagination in Charles Taylor's A Secular Age’, Modern Theology 26, no. 3 (2010), pp. 337-48 (p. 338)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 See, for example, Working with a Secular Age. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Charles Taylor's Master Narrative (De Gruyter, 2016)Google Scholar.
15 See Bruce Riley Ashford & Matthew Ng, ‘Charles Taylor: Apologetics in a Secular Age’, in Forrest, Chatraw, and McGrath, ed., History of Apologetics, pp. 674-95.
16 Taylor, Charles, ‘Modern Social Imaginaries’, Public Culture 14, no. 1 (2002), pp. 91-124CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 92, 111).
17 Taylor, Charles, with Bohmann, Ulf & Montero, Dario, ‘History, Critique, Social Change and Democracy: An Interview with Charles Taylor’, Constellations 21, no. 1 (2014): pp. 3-15Google Scholar (p. 10).
18 Taylor, Charles, A Secular Age (Cambridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007)Google Scholar.
19 Augustine, Concerning the City of God, against the Pagans (London: Penguin, 1984)Google Scholar. Marek Sullivan, ‘Cartesian Secularity: “Disengaged Reason,” the Passions, and the Public Sphere Beyond Charles Taylor's A Secular Age (2007)’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 87, no. 4 (2019), pp. 1050-84CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 1081).
20 Charles Taylor, ‘Interview with Charles Taylor’, pp. 3-15 (pp. 11-12).
21 Charles Taylor, ‘Interview with Charles Taylor’, pp. 3-15 (pp. 5-6).
22 Russell, Nathan, ‘An Introduction to the Overton Window of Political Possibilities’, <https://www.mackinac.org/7504> [accessed 7th May, 2019]+[accessed+7th+May,+2019]>Google Scholar. The author of this paper would like to thank Jonathan Pickering for introducing him to the Overton Window.
23 See, among many examples, Glastris, Paul, ‘Hillary Opens the Overton Window’, The Washington Monthly 48, no. 11/12 (2016), p. 7Google Scholar.
24 Morgan, Daniel J., ‘The Overton Window and a Less Dogmatic Approach to Antibiotics’, Clinical Infectious Diseases 70, no. 11 (2020), pp. 2439–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Dustin, Moira, Ferreira, Nuno & Millns, Susan, ‘Conclusion: Brexit, Gender Justice and the Overton Window’, in Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), pp. 463-72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Oleksandr Valentinovich Karpenko, ‘The “Overton Window” as Manipulative Mechanism of Public Values Transformation’, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, no. 1 (2019), pp. 51-54.
27 This climate analogy is far from new in this field. C.S. Lewis wrote of the apologist's task in terms of spreading ‘an intellectual (and imaginative) climate favourable to Christianity’. Lewis, C.S., Essay Collection & Other Short Pieces (London: Harper Collins, 2000), p. 182Google Scholar.
28 Channel 4 News, ‘Cambridge Analytica Uncovered: Secret filming reveals election tricks’, 19th March 2018. See < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpbeOCKZFfQ> (accessed 5th May, 2021)+(accessed+5th+May,+2021)>Google Scholar.
29 See, among many examples, Crouch, Colin, ‘Balancing reason and emotion in democracy’, The British Academy Blog, 23 February 2017, <https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/blog/balancing-reason-and-emotion-democracy/> (accessed 7 May 2021)Google Scholar.
30 Philip Pullman interview, ‘My daemon is a raven, a bird that steals things’, in The Observer, 22 October 2017, < https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/oct/22/philip-pullman-my-daemon-is-a-raven-la-belle-sauvage-interview-questions> (accessed 7 May 2021).
31 Kirk, Marshall & Madsen, Hunter, After the Ball: How America will conquer its fear and hatred of gays in the 90s (New York: Doubleday, 1989), pp. 152-53, xxviGoogle Scholar.
32 Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, pp. 161-63.
33 Kirk &Madsen, After the Ball, p. 163.
34 Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, pp. 148-53.
35 Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, pp. 153-56.
36 See, among a great many examples, ‘The Cambridge Analytica Files’, on The Guardian website, < https://www.theguardian.com/news/series/cambridge-analytica-files> (accessed 7 May 2021)+(accessed+7+May+2021)>Google Scholar.
37 Oxford Languages, part of Oxford University Press (OUP), made ‘post-truth’ its ‘Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year’ in 2016. OUP defined ‘post-truth’ thus: ‘Relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.’ See <https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016/> (accessed 12 May 2021).
38 Steuter, Erin & Wills, Deborah, At War with Metaphor: Media, Propaganda, and Racism in the War on Terror (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008), p. 18Google Scholar.
39 O'Donovan, Oliver, The Ways of Judgment, (Grand Rapids, Mich.; Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans, 2005), p. xiiiGoogle Scholar.
40 See <https://www.wordonfire.org>, <https://www.alpha.org>, and <https://www.christianityexplored.org> (accessed 6 May, 2021).
41 McGrath, Alister E., Re-imagining Nature: the promise of a Christian natural theology (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2017), p. 143Google Scholar. See also McGrath, Alister E., The Open Secret: a new vision for natural theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
42 Taylor describes ‘the immanent frame’ thus: ‘we come to understand our lives as taking place within a self-sufficient immanent order’. Taylor, Secular Age, p. 543.