No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Necessary Fictions, Real Presences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Extract
George Steiner in his subtle and richly suggestive essay, Real Presences, sees in the origins of modernism a breaking of the covenant between word and world which he regards as the significant characteristic of the decades following 1870. For Steiner, this sundering of continuities constitutes ‘one of the very few genuine revolutions of spirit in Western history’. Mallarmé and Rimbaud represent the beginnings of a genuinely new aesthetic, ‘a parting of the semantic ways’. Before this time, he argues, we could have presumed upon a logocentric order, a Logos-aesthetic, which included the assumption of correspondence, understood as something ‘strictly inseparable from the postulate of theological-metaphysical transcendence’. Such a world presupposes ‘real presence’.
While there is much to appeal in this argument, I wonder whether the Christian tradition has always had a more healthy suspicion of the innocent collusion of word and world than Steiner allows. The monist ontology at which Steiner hints does not allow for the rich sense of mystery that confronts us in the world of which we are a part: things as things stand over against us, ultimately unfathomable. There are aspects of the Nominalist agenda deeply rooted in the Christian tradition and rightly so. We come to what is real by way of the particular. Steiner, of course, is far from unmindful of this and comments with some force:
The arts are most,wonderfully rooted in substance, in the human body, in stone, in pigment, in the twanging of gut or weight of wind on reeds. All good art and literature begin in immanence.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 George Steiner, Real Presences. Faber & Faber. 1989, p 93.
2 George Steiner, op cit, p 119.
3 George Steiner, op cit, p 227.
4 Donald, MacKinnon, ‘Prolegomena to Christology’, Journal of Theological Studies, 33, 1982. p 153Google Scholar.
5 Aquinas, Questiones Quodlibetales, IX, a. 5 ad 2.
6 Moore’s, G.E. ‘External and Internal Relations’ was published in his Philosophical Studies, Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1922. pp 276–309Google Scholar. Apart from the article by Rowan Williams, we must refer to three pieces by MacKinnon himself: ‘Aristotle’s Conception of Substance’ in New Essays on Plato and Aristotle. ed. Renford Barnbrough. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965, pp 97–119: ‘“Substance” in Christology — A Cross-Bench View’, in Christ, Faith and History. ed S. Sykes & J.P.Clayton. Cambridge, 1972, pp 279–300: ‘The Problem of the “System of Projection” appropriate to Christian Theological Statements’, in Exploration in Theology 5, S.C.M., 1979, pp 70–89. esp. pp 85–88. Here he refers the reader to the important paper by Professor Jonathan, Bennett, ‘Entailment’. Philosophical Review, 78, 1969, pp 197–236Google Scholar.
7 Rowan, Williams, ‘Trinity and Ontology’, in Christ, Ethics and Tragedy, ed. Kenneth Surin, Cambridge, 1989, p 80Google Scholar.
8 Summa Theologiae. 3a, 77, 1.
9 See Categories. 5, 2a. 11–16; Metaphysics, VII. 11.1037a5.
10 G.L Prestige, Gad in Patristic Thought, S.P.C.K. 1964. pp 168–178.
11 P.J. FitzPatrick. In Breaking of Bread Cambridge. 1993. p 138: See also p 206, p 264.
12 P.J. FitzPatrick, op cit., p 231.
13 P.J. FitzPatrick, op.cit., p 354.
14 P.J. FitzPatrick, op.cit., p 206.
15 ‘Aristotle’s Conception of Substance’, p 103.
16 ‘Aristotle’s Conception of Substance’. p 105.
17 E. Portalié. A Guide to the Thought of St Augustine, trans. R Bastian, Bums Oates, 1960 pp 247–260.
18 St Augustine. Tractates on the Gospel of John, 11–27. trans. John W. Rettig. Fathers of the Church. vol 79. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, 1988, note 34, p 268. Rettig refers the reader to an important series of studies. M-F Berrouard. ‘Pour une refléxion sur le ‘sacramentum’ augustinien. La Manne et l’Eucharistic dans le Tractatus XXVI, 11–12 in Ioannis Evangelium,’ Forma Futuri: Studi in onore del Cardinale Michele Pellegrino, Turin 1975, pp 830–844: M-F Berrouard ‘L’être sacramental de l’eucharistie selon saint Augustin: Commentaire de Io 6,60–63 dans le Tractatus XXVII. 1–6. et 11–12 in Ioannis Evangelium’. in Nouvelle revue théologique, 99 (1977) 702–721; E. Siedlecki, A Patristic Synthesis of John VI, 54–55. Mundelein, III, 1956.
19 See, Carnelot, P.-Th. ‘Réalisme et symbolisme dans le doctrine eucharistique de S. Augustin’, in Revue de Sciences Philosophiques et Theologiques, 31, (1947), pp 394–410Google Scholar.
20 Paul, Ricoeur. ‘Imagination in Discourse and in Action’, in Analecta Husserliana, vol 8, ed. Anna-Teresa, Tymienieka, Reidel, London 1978, p 7Google Scholar.
21 See Ricoeur. art. cit.. p 9–10.
22 Easter Sunday, Sermon 227. The Fathers of the Church, vol 38, trans. Sister Mary Sarah Muldowney, R.S.M., New York, 1959, pp 195 — 198. See also the very similar sermon on the Holy Eucharist, Sermon 6, (Den.) in Fathers of the Church vol 11,trans. Denis. J. Kavanagh, O.S.A., New York, 1951.pp 321–326.
23 St Hilary, The Trinity, trans. Stephen McKenna, Fathers of the Church. vol 25 New York, 1954. Bk 8, 14, p 286.
24 PL 194, 1896 A B. See Etienne Gilson, History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Sheed & Ward, London, 1978, p 168–9.632.
25 Gilson, p 168.
26 Isaac of Stella, Sermons, 42. See also 2 (man and woman capable of deification).
27 John, D. Zizioulas. ‘Apostolic Continuity and Succession’. in Being as Communion, St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, Crestwood. New York, 1985. p 206Google Scholar.
28 Wallace Stevens, The Necessary Angel. Faber. 1984, p 32.
29 This phrase from an unattributed work of Terry Eagleton in which, in a completely different context, Professor Eagleton talks of meaning, is cited in Steiner. op. cit., p 123.