Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:16:38.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III: On the Other Hand…

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 AAS 54 (1962), pp. 791–2Google Scholar. This was Pope John's famous ‘prophets of doom’ speech.

2 cuius munus est doctrinam de fide et moribus in universo catholico orbe tutari’, AAS 57 (1965), p. 954Google Scholar.

3 Ratzinger, J., Das neue Volk Gottes. Entwürfe zur Ekklesiologie, Dusseldorf, 1972, pp. 152177Google Scholar.

4 ‘Una vero est fidelium universalis Ecclesia, extra quam nullus omnino salvatur’, DS 802. Cf. DS 575, 792. For Cyprian, cf. PL 3, 1123–24; 4, 503–504.

5 DS 870, 1351.

6 DS 2731.

7 DS 2866–67, 2917.

8 DS 3869–70, 3821; Lumen Gentium (=LG), 16.

9 In supra, n. 3, p. 168, n. 30.

10 DS 3866.

11 Cf. LG 9, 48; Gaudium et Spes (= GS), 45; etc.

12 In supra, n. 2, p. 953.

13 LG 16; GS 22; Ad Gentes (=AG), 9; Optatam Totius (=OT), 16.

14 AG 9.

15 Cf. GS 11.40.

16 OT 16.

17 GS 33; cf. 62.

18 GS 44.

19 Ratzinger, J., ‘The Pastoral Implications of Episcopal Collegiality’, Concilium: Dogma, no. 1 (1965), p. 30Google Scholar. Repeated in the German n. 3 supra, p. 67.

20 Ratzinger, J., ‘Announcements and Prefatory Notes of Explanation’, in Vorgrimler, H. (ed.), Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II, Herder, 1967, vol. 1, p. 300Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., pp. 303–304. Cf LG 22, and Nota praevia, nn. 3–4.

22 Vorgrimler, p. 304.

23 Ibid.

24 The outstanding conciliar statement on the local Church appears like a comet in LG 26. Rahner explains, in Vorgrimler (n. 20 supra, p. 216), that this was a late interpolation to meeet complaints of a too one‐sidedly “universal” treatment of the Church. Cf. also Rahner, , Theological Investigations, vol. 10, London, 1973, pp. 911Google Scholar and (on Ratzinger's charge that Rahner is extremely radical on the local Church) p. 101, n. 27.