Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T11:31:53.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charles Taylor replies:

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Charles Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Leacock Building, 855 Sherbrooke St.W., Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2TZ Canada

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Charles Taylor with his responses
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 The Author. New Blackfriars © 2010 The Dominican Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

38 Letter to Gibieuf of 19 January 1642; English in Descartes: Philosophical Letters, trans Kenny, Anthony, (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1970), p. 123Google Scholar.

39 The actual text of para 115 reads: Ein Bild hielt uns gefangen. Und heraus konnten wir nicht, denn es lag in unsrer Sprache, und sie schien es uns unerbittlich zu wiederholen. In my discussion, I argue more that the picture in anchored in our whole way of thinking, our way of objectifying the world, and thus our way of life, and therefore also in our language.

40 Plato, The Republic, 518C-D; Plato speaks here of a ‘conversion’, a ‘turning around’ (periagôgê).

41 ‘to d’ auto estin hê kat’ energeian epistêmê tôi pragmati’, de Anima, Book III, 430a20; and again at 431a1.

42 Later Aristotle says that ‘knowledge is the knowable and sensation is the sensible’. This doesn't mean that the sensible and cognitive faculties are identical with the object as a material entity; ‘for the stone doesn't exist in the soul, but only the form of a stone’(431b22, 432a1). It is in the eidos that the mind and object come together.