Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:24:56.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Augustine and the Legacy of Guilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Mary Grey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The task facing a feminist theologian when asked to reflect on the legacy of St Augustine and sin is indeed daunting. For when confronting contemporary understanding of sin and guilt, it is frequently assumed that the legacy of guilt and the whole burden of responsibility for sin which women have borne in Christianity is somehow to be laid at Augustine’s door. So the problem underlying this paper is basically a historical one: how much responsibility for pessimistic views of human nature can be traced to what Augustine actually wrote and taught? Secondly, to reflect critically on Augustinian notions of sin will inevitably obscure the positive dimensions of his thought—in particular, his views on community, sacrament and Christology. For this I apologize in advance. But no one will thank me for tracing the legacy of Augustine’s teaching on sin through the anguishings of Luther and the rigorous extremism of Baius and Jansenius to the Papal encyclicals of this century. Instead, I begin by sketching sin-consciousness today. I then look briefly at Augustine’s doctrines in the context of 4th-century Christianity. Thirdly, I focus on certain threads, presumed to be the Augustinian legacy, and in the last section I look at attempts to represent ‘the sin of the world’ suggesting an alternative based on feminist psychological research.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 70 , Issue 832 , November 1989 , pp. 476 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem. Rev. Ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth. 1%3, p. 298Google Scholar.

2 Cox, Harvey, The Seduction of the Spirit, Wildwood House, London, 1974Google Scholar.

3 P. Tillich, ‘Nature, too, Mourns for a Lost Good’, in the Shaking of the Foundations, Penguin, Harmondsworth. 1963.

4 P. Tillich, ‘The Depth of Existencersquo;, in ibid.

5 May, Rollo, Love and Will, Dell Publishing, New York. 1969Google Scholar.

6 Fox, Matthew, Western Spirituality: Historical Roots. Ecumenical Routes. Bear and Co, Santa Fe, 1981, p. 3Google Scholar.

7 Brown, Peter, The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity, Columbia University Press, New York, 1988, p. xvi‐xviiGoogle Scholar.

8 Brown, Peter, Religion and Society in the Age of Augustine. Faber and Faber, London, 1972Google Scholar.

9 Peter Brown, The Body and Society, op cit.

10 See Babcock, W.S., ‘Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency’, Journal of Religious Ethics 1988. p. 28–55Google Scholar: ‘But it is in relation to the angelic fall that Augustine explicitly addresses the question of the origin of evil will, and here, despite his best efforts, his analysis swivels between a position that, in effect, reduces the first evil act to a random outcome, a chance association between agent and act, and a position that, in effect, makes the first evil will a function of God's withholding aid.’

11 Elaine Pagels, Adam, Eve and the Serpent, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1988. For critical reviews of her controversial thesis see R.J. O'Connell. in Theological Studies 50/1/1989/p.201, and Gilles Quispel in Vigiliae Christianue 431 1 / 19891 100–103.

12 I acknowledge a debt to Professor T.J. Van Bavel OSA of the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, for his comments and for his article Augustinus's Denken over De Vrouw. Bijdragen 48, (1987). pp.362–3%.

13 Rich, Adrienne, Of Woman born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution, New York, W. and W. Norton, 1976, p.168Google Scholar, cited in Daly, Mary, Gyn/Ecologv: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, London, The Womens' Press, 1979, pp. 258–9Google Scholar.

14 Rich, Adrienne, Of Woman born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution, New York, W. and W. Norton, 1976, p.168Google Scholar, cited in Daly, Mary, Gyn/Ecologv: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, London, The Womens' Press, 1979, pp. 258–9Google Scholar.

15 Rich, Adrienne, Of Woman born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution, New York, W. and W. Norton, 1976, p.168Google Scholar, cited in Daly, Mary, Gyn/Ecologv: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, London, The Womens' Press, 1979, pp. 258–9Google Scholar.

16 Kristeva, Julia. ‘About Chinese Women’, in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Moi, Toril, Oxford, Blackwell, 1986, tr. Hand, Sean, p. 147Google Scholar.

17 The victim status of women has even been used as an argument against the ordination of women: ‘Well are women warned from serving on the altar Who, by nature of their creation, from Caucasia to Carbonek, share with the sacrifice thevictimisation of the blood … Womens’ flesh lives out the quest of the Grail …’ Charles Williams, The Region of the Summer Slurs. D.S. Brewer, Cambridge, 1938, p. 26–7.

17 The victim status of women has even been used as an argument against the ordination of women: ‘Well are women warned from serving on the altar Who, by nature of their creation, from Caucasia to Carbonek, share with the sacrifice the victimisation of the blood … Womens’ flesh lives out the quest of the Grail …' Charles Williams, The Region of the Summer Slurs. D.S. Brewer, Cambridge, 1938, p. 26‐7.

18 Niebuhr, Rcinhold. The Nature and Destiny of Man. Vols 1, 11, New York. 1964Google Scholar.

19 Cited in Plaskow, Judith, Sex, Sin and Grace: Womens' Experience und The Theologies of Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich. Yale University 1976. p.134Google Scholar.

20 Mary Daly, Gyn/Ecology, p.374.

21 Collins, Sheila, A Different Heaven and Earth. Valley Forge, 1974, p.84Google Scholar.

22 Thomas Szasz, quoted by Collins, A Different Heaven, p.89.

23 Valerie Saiving Goldstcin, ‘The Human Condition: A Feminine View’, in Journalof Religion, ∼01490, 1960, reprinted in Womanspirit Rising, eds. Christ and Plaskow, Harper and Row, San Francisco, 1974, pp. 25–42.

24 Kierkegaard, S., The Sickness unto Death, New York, Doubleday. 1954, 183–4Google Scholar.

25 Goldstein, op. cit., p. 37.

26 Attwood, Margaret, Surfacing, The Womens' Press, London, 1979Google Scholar.

27 Osiek, Carolyn, Anger, Beyond, On Being u Feminist in the Church, Gill and Macmillan, Dublin, 1986, p.79Google Scholar.

28 ‘This fact of our being situated’, he wrote, ‘is an inner determinism of every human being and this corresponds to the fact that original sin exists in everybody as something proper to him’. P. Schoonenberg, Mun und Sin, London, Sheed and Ward, 1965, p.186.

29 ‘This fact of our being situated’, he wrote, ‘is an inner determinism of every human being and this corresponds to the fact that original sin exists in everybody as something proper to him’. P. Schoonenberg, Mun und Sin, London, Sheed and Ward, 1965, p.186.

30 Duffy, Stephen, Original Sin Re‐Visited, in Theological Studies 49, (1988). p.612Google Scholar.

31 ‘We are stumbling after a union with a dreamed‐of and unknown God and that is our greatness and our wretchedness’. Moore, Sebastian, ‘Original Sin, Resurrection and Trinity’, Lonergan Workshop 4, (1983), pp.85–98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 ‘The fatal flaw of concupiscence would not have seemed so tragic to Augustine. if he had not been even more deeply convinced that human beings had been created to embrace the material world. The body was a problem to him precisely because it wasto be loved and cherished’. Peter Brown, The Body and Society, op cit., p.425.

33 Heidegger, , Being und Time, New York, Harper and Row, 1962Google Scholar, tr. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, p.231.

34 Heidegger, , Being und Time, New York, Harper and Row, 1962Google Scholar, tr. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, p.231.

35 Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice? Harvard University Press, 1982Google Scholar.

36 Miller, Jean Baker, Towards a New Psychology of Women, Boston, Beacon, 1976Google Scholar.

37 Heidegger, Being and Time, op cit. p.370.

38 Rollo May, Love and Will, op. cit. p.286.