Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T23:10:34.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aquinas on Kinship and Caritas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jesse Russell
Jesse Russell*
Affiliation:
Georgia Southwestern State University
*
jesse.russell@gsw.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both within and without the Church, contemporary political discourse is haunted by the question of ethnicity and identity. Many thinkers further have sounded the death knell of the liberal world order, which promised the eventual abolition of ethnic ties and the coalescence of the brotherhood of humanity. At the same time, there is a rising tide of ‘ethnonationalism’, which (over-) emphasizes the importance of ethnic identity at the expense of recognition of a shared common humanity among all people. Happily, St. Thomas Aquinas presents a remedy in his work, noting the importance of ethnic identity and kinship, which the Angelic doctor places within a wider framework of charity.

Keywords

AquinasPoliticsAristotleYoram HazonyCommunity
Type
Original Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 103 , Issue 1107 , September 2022 , pp. 622 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hazony, Yoram, The Virtue of Nationalism (New York: Basic Books, 2018)Google Scholar.

2 , R.R. Reno, Return of the Strong Gods: Nationalism, Populism, and the Future of the West (New York: Regnery, 2019)Google Scholar. To round out the ‘triple melting pot’ of American Religions, see the work on nationalism by the Protestant editor of National Review, Rich Lowry's The Case of Nationalism: How It Made Us Powerful, United, and Free (Broadside Books, 2019)Google Scholar. See also Samuel Goldman's recent After Nationalism: Being American in an Age of Division (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021)Google Scholar.

3 See Patrick Deneen's Why Liberalism Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019)Google Scholar.

4 Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (New York: Benzinger Brothers, 1948)Google Scholar, II-II, q. 101, a. 1.

5 S.T. II-II, q. 101, a. 1.

6 S.T. II-II, q. 101, a. 1.

7 S.T. II-II, q. 23, a. 5.

8 St. Aquinas, Thomas ‘De regno ad regem Cypri’, Trans. Phelan, Gerald B., rev. I. Th. Eschmann O.P. (Toronto: Institute of Medieval Studies, 1949)Google Scholar, (2.14).

9 Aquinas, De regno, 2.14.

10 Ibid.

11 Porro, Pasquale, Thomas Aquinas: A Historical and Philosophical Profile, trans. Trabbic, Joseph G. and Nutt, Roger W. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2016), 338Google Scholar.

12 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Internet Classics Archive, 2009, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.html, 1.2.

13 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

14 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 18.

15 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 31.

16 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 18.

17 Maritain, Jacques, Man and the State (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998), 10Google Scholar.

18 Maritain, Jacques, Christianity and Democracy and The Rights of Man and Natural Law, trans. Anson, Doris C. (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1986), 53-54Google Scholar.

19 Maritain, Christianity and Democracy, 54.

20 Maritain, Christianity and Democracy, 54.

21 Maritain, Jacques, Integral Humanism, Freedom in the Modern World, and A Letter on Independence, ed. Bird, Otto, trans. Bird, Otto, Evans, Joseph, and Richard O'Sullivan, K.C. (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007), 279Google Scholar.

22 See Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: Random House, 2002)Google Scholar.

23 See Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill's discussion in ‘Voegelin on Aristotle's “Science of the Polis”’, Political Science Reviewer 41, no. 1 (2017): 52-74Google Scholar.

24 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

25 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

26 Discussing Aquinas's Commentary on Aristotle's Politics, Pasquale Porro notes that nature is ‘a model for art and predisposes its principles’, and human reason ‘must bring to completion what nature suggests to it…’. Porro, Thomas Aquinas, 337. Reason, Porro further argues, aims at ordering human beings ‘insofar as they permit themselves to be directed and governed by reason’, 377.

27 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

28 José Luis Cendejas Bueno, ‘Economics, chrematistics, oikos and polis in Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas’, The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues 10, no. 2 (2017): 5-46, 8Google Scholar.

29 Cendejas Bueno, ‘Economics, chrematistics, oikos and polis in Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas’, 8.

30 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

31 Aristotle, ‘Politics’, 1.2.

32 Mulgan, Richard, ‘Was Aristotle an “Aristotelian Social Democrat?”’, Ethics 111 (2000): 79–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Garver, Eugene Aristotle's Politics: Living Well and Living Together (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014)Google Scholar; and Trott, Adriel M., Aristotle on the Nature of Community. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See, for example, Yack, Bernard, The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought (Berkeley: University of California, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, as well as Miller, Fred D., Nature, Rights and Justice in Aristotle's Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosler, Andrés, Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar; and Nussbaum, Martha, ‘Aristotelian Social Democracy’ in Liberalism and the Good, ed. Mara, Gerald, Richardson, Henry S., and Douglass, R. Bruce (New York: Routledge, 1990), 203–52Google Scholar.

34 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 3.

35 S.T. II-II, q. 31, q. 3.

36 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 3.

37 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 3.

38 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 3.

39 Pope, Stephen, The Evolution of Altruism and the Ordering of Love. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994), 64Google Scholar.

40 Pope, The Evolution of Altruism and the Ordering of Love, 64.

41 As Br. Raphael Joshua Christianson OP explains in a recent article, in the thought of Aquinas ‘even before becoming friends, individuals must pursue some similar good, which means they must each have some likeness or similar form directing them to that good’. Christianson, Raphael Joshua OP, ‘A Thomistic Model of Friendship with God as Deification’, New Blackfriars 100, no. 1089 (2019): 509-525, 513CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 S.T. I–II, q. 27, a.3.

43 S.T. I–II, q. 27, a.3.

44 S.T. I–II, q. 27, a.3.

45 As Br. Raphael further explains, friendship, further strengthens the bonds the natural and formal human bonds: ‘For two individuals to share one form means those two individuals have some common organizing principle directing them to perceive certain ends or activities as good and so to engage in those activities. Prior to friendship, they each possess some similar form or organizing principle leading them to delight in certain activities. When they enter into friendship, that organizing principle and the delight they receive in those activities can be reinforced’. Christianson, ‘A Thomistic Model of Friendship with God as Deification’, 514.

46 S.T. II-II, q. 32, a. 3.

47 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

48 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

49 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

50 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

51 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

52 S.T. II-II, q. 26, a. 13.

53 Ceglie, Roberto Di, ‘Faith, reason, and charity in Thomas Aquinas's thought’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2016): 133-146, 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 S.T. II-II, q. 23, a. 6.

55 S.T. II-II, q. 23, a. 6.

56 S.T. II-II, q. 23, a. 8. As Robert Miner explains, ‘Charity is not so much the form in the standard sense as it is a formative power. It “gives” form to the other virtues by ordering their acts and ends to the finis ultimus, the “enjoyment of God” (Dei fruition)’, Miner, Robert, ‘Thomas Aquinas and Hans Urs von Balthasar: A Dialogue on Love and Charity’, New Blackfriars 95, no. 1059 (2014): 504-524, 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 S.T. II-II, q. 23, a. 7.

58 Clark, Meghan J., ‘Love of God and Neighbor: Living Charity in Aquinas's Ethics’, New Blackfriars 92, no. 1040 (2011), 415-430, 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 2.

60 S.T. II-II, q. 31, a. 2.

61 As Meghan Clark argues, ‘‘…Aquinas is clear that charity extends to one's neighbors, by which he means the entire human community’, Clark, ‘Love of God and Neighbor’, 418.

62 S.T. II-II, q. 44, a. 1.

63 S.T. II-II, q. 44, a. 1.

64 S.T. II-II, q. 44, a. 6.

65 S.T. II-II, q. 44, a. 3.

66 S.T. II-II, q. 44, a. 4.

67 Clark, ‘Love of God and Neighbor’, 417.

68 Emery, Fr. Gilles, OP, The Trinitarian Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Murphy, Francesca Aran (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 207Google Scholar.

69 Emery, The Trinitarian Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, 207.

70 Aquinas, Thomas, On Love and Charity: Readings from the Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, trans. Kwasniewski, Peter A., Bolin, Thomas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008)Google Scholar, In III SENT. d. 27, q. 2, a. 1. Br. Raphael Joshua Christianson argues that charity further ultimately leads to true peace and concord with God: ‘Such concord and peace occur within charity-friendship, meaning that the human person's intended state is to have friendship with God. Friendship with God implies deification, meaning the human person's intended state is to be deiform’, Christianson, ‘A Thomistic Model of Friendship’, 523.

71 Christianson, ‘A Thomistic Model of Friendship’, 524.

72 Maritain, Man and the State, 59.

73 Pope Pius XI, ‘Quas Primas’, The Holy See, http://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_11121925_quas-primas.html

74 Pius XI, ‘Quas Primas’.

75 Piux XI, ‘Quas Primas’.

76 Pope Benedict XVI, ‘General Audience: Paul VI Audience Hall, Wednesday, 28 November 2012’, The Holy See, http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20121128.html For further treatment, see Emery de Gaál and Matthew Levering, eds. Joseph Ratzinger and the Healing of Reformation-Era Divisions (The image of Christians as leaven of the world can be traced to St. John Chrysostom; see Fr. Heim, Maximillian Heinrich, Joseph Ratzinger: Life in the Church and Living Theology (San Francisco: Ignatius, 2007), 100Google Scholar.

77 Benedict XVI, ‘General Audience’.

78 Benedict XVI, ‘General Audience’.

79 Aillet, Bishop Marc, ‘The Sacred Liturgy and the New Communities’, in Sacred Liturgy: The Source and Summit of the Life and Mission of the Church, edited by Reed, Alcuin (Ignatius: San Francisco, 2014), 163-182, 166Google Scholar.

80 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 129.

81 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 129.

82 Hazony, The Virtue of Nationalism, 130.

83 Taylor, Charles, Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Gutman, Amy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Taylor, Multiculturalism, 73.

85 Taylor, Multiculturalism, 73.

86 Macintyre, Alasdair, the Tasks of Philosophy, Selected Essays, Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.