Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T00:30:37.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Eschatological Critique of Catherine Pickstock's Liturgical Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Catherine Pickstock's After Writing sets out to provide an account of liturgical time, subjectivity, and worship which is capable of surpassing the deconstruction of each of these in modernity and postmodernity. Her account of the way in which each of these is treated in the old Roman Rite, however, accentuates elements of ambiguity and deferral which erase two significant elements of traditional Catholic treatments of eschatology. The iterative element of growth and progress in holiness and Christian virtue is subsumed by continuous emphasis on ambiguity and deferral, while the promise of real eschatological novelty - that God seen now only in signs will be seen later face to face - is dissolved by an excessive valorisation of liturgical presence in the mode of signs. In order to avoid a postmodern reduction, then, it is better to embrace the liturgical vision of Joseph Ratzinger, in which liturgy and eschatology are both separated and united as different modalities of the presence of Christ, in which temporal liturgical life not only participates in but is directed towards a greater future fulfilment in the eschatological presence of God.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouyer, Louis. Life and Liturgy. Stagbook edition. London: Sheed and Ward, 1962.Google Scholar
Catholic Church. Catechism of the Catholic Church. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1994.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. ‘Letter on Certain Questions Concerning Eschatology.’ May 17, 1979. Accessed December 18, 2014. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19790517_escatologia_en.html.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Monika K.Eschatology.’ In Systematic Theology: Roman Catholic Perspectives. Edited by Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler and Galvin, John P.. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan, 1992.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, and Oliver, Simon, eds. The Radical Orthodoxy Reader. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Pattison, George. ‘After Transubstantiation.’ In Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy. Edited by Hankey, Wayne J. and Hedley, Douglas. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine. After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph. Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life. 2nd edition. Translated by Waldstein, Michael. Translation edited by Nichols, Aidan. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph. The Spirit of the Liturgy. Translated by Saward, John. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2000.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph. ‘The End of Time.’ In The End of Time? The Provocation of Talking about God. Edited by Peters, Tiemo Reiner and Urban, Claus, trans. Ashley, J. Matthew. New York: Paulist, 2004.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council. Gaudium et spes. In Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. 1981 edition. Edited by Flannery, Austin. Leominster: Fowler Wright, 1981.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council. Lumen gentium. In Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. 1981 edition. Edited by Flannery, Austin. Leominster: Fowler Wright, 1981.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Council. Sacrosanctum concilium. In Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. 1981 edition. Edited by Flannery, Austin. Leominster: Fowler Wright, 1981.Google Scholar
Wainwright, Geoffrey. Eucharist and Eschatology. London: Epworth, 1971.Google Scholar