Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:51:16.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deus Absconditus: A Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Chad Engelland*
Affiliation:
University of Dallas

Abstract

In the tradition of both Cicero and Hume, this paper explores the nature of God in dialogic form. Set at the tomb of Thomas Aquinas, in a church that is now a museum, the dialogue focuses on the central question of divine hiddenness, offering a novel alternative to both the atheistic interpretation of hiddenness in terms of divine amoral aloofness and the theistic account of hiddenness in terms of human indolence. Phenomenologically speaking, God the creator, in order to be God the creator, must be hidden to creatures. Divine hiddenness is, therefore, natural and does not necessarily call into question the moral status of God or of humans.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Gay Science, trans. Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Vintage, 1974)Google Scholar, §125.

3 For a more sophisticated statement of this line of argument, see Schellenberg, J. L., The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy's New Challenge to Belief in God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Pensées, trans. Trotter, W. F. (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co, 1958), n. 194Google Scholar.

5 Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, trans. Hollingdale, R. J., ed. Clark, Maudemarie and Leiter, Brian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), n. 91Google Scholar.

6 On the contrast between the pagan and the Christian understanding, see Sokolowski, Robert, The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995).Google Scholar

7 For the problematical character of ‘person’ when applied to God the creator, see, for example, Davies, Brian OP, The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil (London: Continuum, 2006), 93-94Google Scholar.

8 Pensées, n. 242.

9 See Davies, Brian, OP, The Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 25-57Google Scholar.

10 Summa Contra Gentiles, I, c. 5; Summa Theologiae, I, q. 61, a. 2, ad. 2.

11 Summa Theologiae, I, q. 1, a. 6, ad 3

12 For this meaning of creation, see Schmitz, Kenneth L., The Gift: Creation (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

13 1 Kings 19:11-13.

14 1 Corinthians 13:12 (Douay-Rheims).

15 Marion, Jean-Luc, ‘Terrifying, Wondrous Tintin’, trans. Syrotinski, Michael, Yale French Studies, no. 131/132 (2017): 222–36Google Scholar.

16 Isaiah 45:15.

17 Life in a Jewish Family: Her Unfinished Autobiographical Account, trans. Koeppel, Josephine, OCD (Washington, DC: Institute of Carmelite Press, 1986), 401Google Scholar.

18 Blaise Pascal, Oeuvre Complètes, ed. J. Mesnard, Desclée de Brouwer, 1964-, III, 1037-1038, quoted in McDade, John, ‘Divine Disclosure and Concealment in Bach, Pascal and Levinas’, New Blackfriars 85 (2004): 124-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Psalm 91:13 (Douay-Rheims).

20 Thomas Aquinas, ‘Prayer before Study’.