Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:11:58.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the ‘Awkward Embrace’: Disability Rights, Dialogue and ‘Law, Love and Language’ Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Nick O'Brien
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the perceived ‘human rights revolution’ within Church teaching since Vatican II, a measure of dissonance survives between secular rights theory and practice on the one hand and, on the other, ethical thinking informed by the natural law tradition. This article examines some recent developments in that secular theory and practice for signs of possible rapprochement. In particular, it considers the way in which the emergence of ‘disability’ as a rights issue, for example in the recently ratified United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, has contributed to the transformation of equality and human rights law and so has helped shape a broader transformation of rights theory and practice. Central to that transformation has been the ambition of establishing human rights as the basis of a progressive political programme, as witnessed for example by the work of Sandra Fredman and by the Hamlyn Lectures of Conor Gearty, whose Catholic provenance makes his approach especially salient. The article concludes by considering Herbert McCabe's interpretation of Aquinas’ ethics, especially in his Law, Love and Language, and proposes some potentially fruitful points of contact between McCabe's approach and the identified developments in secular rights theory.

Keywords

Human rightsethicsdisability rightsnatural lawMcCabe
Type
Original Articles
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 90 , Issue 1029 , September 2009 , pp. 535 - 551
Copyright
© The author 2009. Journal compilation © The Dominican Council/Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2009, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK, and 350 Main Street, Malden MA 02148, USA

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Taylor, Charles, A Secular Age (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007), p. 419Google Scholar

2 Most recently, Pope Benedict XVI's address to the United Nations delivered in New York on 18 April 2008

3 Ruston, Roger, Human Rights and the Image of God (London: SCM Press, 2004)Google Scholar, Chapter 2

4 Helft, James L., ed., A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 116–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Tina Beattie, ‘A fulfilment that is recognisable and yet unknown: Christian Teleology and the End of Human Rights’, unpublished paper delivered to The Society for the Study of Theology Annual Conference, St John's College, Durham, 31 March-3 April 2008, available at http://tina.beattie.googlepages.com/papers

6 Bishop, Marilyn E., ed., Religion and Disability: Essays in Scripture, Theology and Ethics (Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, 1995)Google Scholar. See too, Nuttgens, Bridget, ‘One World: the Disabled in Society’, New Blackfriars 80 (1999) pp. 291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Gooding, Caroline, Disabling Laws, Enabling Acts: Disability Rights in Britain and America (London: Pluto Press, 1994Google Scholar)

8 Oliver, Michael, The Politics of Disablement (London: Macmillan, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 United Nations, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and Optional Protocol (2007). Text and background information available at http://www.un.org/disabilities

10 Ibid.

11 Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar. For consideration of the way in which Sen's work might be of ‘particular interest to Catholics’ and converge with Catholic social teaching, see Booth, Edward OP, ‘Amartya Sen: “The Conscience of Economics” A Brief Outline of his Thought’, New Blackfriars 83 (2002), pp. 469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Nussbaum, Martha C., Beyond the Social Contract: Toward Global Justice (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 12–13Google Scholar November 2002 and 5–6 March 2003), published in a revised version as part of Nussbaum, Martha C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

13 Nussbaum, Beyond the Social Contract, pp. 423–448

14 Martha Nussbaum, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), pp. 312–313

15 Ibid. p. 344

16 Ibid.

17 bid. p. 345

18 Fredman, Sandra, ‘Disability Equality: A Challenge to the Existing Anti-Discrimination Paradigm?’, in Lawson, Anna and Gooding, Caroline, eds., Disability Rights in Europe: From Theory to Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005), pp. 199–218Google Scholar

19 Taylor, Charles, ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in Guttman, Amy, ed., Multiculuralism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 25–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Ibid. p. 61

21 Sen, Freedom, pp. xi-xii

22 See especially, Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Ibid. p. 15

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid. p. 16

26 Ibid. p. 17

27 Ibid. p. 20

28 Ibid. p. 23

29 Ibid. p. 5

30 Ibid. Chapter 1

31 Gearty, Conor, The Hamlyn Lectures 2005: Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

32 Kim Economides, William Twining, Gavin Phillipson, Shami Chakrabarti, Conor Gearty, ‘Can Human Rights Survive? A Symposium on the 2005 Hamlyn Lectures’, Public Law, Summer (2007) pp. 209–232, at p. 230

33 Ibid. pp. 211–212

34 Gearty, Hamlyn Lectures, pp. 43–44, and 48–49, citing Oliver Davies, ‘Divine Silence, Human Rights’, Aquinas Lecture 2005, ‘Rights and Revelation’, New Blackfriars 89 (2008): 441–467Google Scholar.

35 Twining, Public Law, p. 213

36 Gearty, Hamlyn Lectures, p. 45–46

37 Ibid. p. 45

38 Ibid. pp. 140–141

39 Ibid. p. 32

40 Ibid. p. 41

41 Ibid. p. 42

42 Ibid. pp. 43–44

43 McCabe, Herbert OP, Law, Love and Language (London: Sheed and Ward, 1968Google Scholar; republished London: Continuum, 2003). See also Hauerwas, Stanley, ‘An Unpublished Foreword’, New Blackfriars 86 (2005), pp. 291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Smith, James, Terry Eagleton: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008), esp. pp. 13–15Google Scholar

44 Ibid. p. 34

45 McCabe, Herbert OP, God Still Matters (London: Continuum, 2002), pp. 4–6Google Scholar

46 McCabe, Law, Love and Language, p. 98

47 Ibid. p. 94

48 Ibid. p. 95

49 McCabe, Herbert, The Good Life (London: Continuum, 2005), p. 87Google Scholar

50 McCabe, Law, Love and Language, pp. 126–127

51 Ibid. p. 146. For fuller treatment of the sacramental life, see McCabe, Herbert, The New Creation: Studies on Living in the Church (London: Sheed and Ward, 1964)Google Scholar.

52 Ibid. pp. 148–149

53 Nichols, Aidan OP, ‘The English Dominican Social Tradition’, in Compagnoni, Francesco OP and Alford, Helen OP, eds., Preaching Justice: Dominican Contributors to Social Ethics in the Twentieth Century (Dublin: Dominican Publications, 2007), pp. 429–432Google Scholar

54 McCabe, Law, Love and Language, pp. 166–173

55 Twining, Public Law, p. 217

56 McCabe, Herbert, On Aquinas (London: Burns and Oates, 2008), p. 156Google Scholar