Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:12:21.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syntactic Analysis of Hebrew Sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

Shuly Wintner  and
Uzzi Ornan
Shuly Wintner
Affiliation:
Computer Science Department, Technion Haifa 32000, Israel Email: shuly@cs.technion.ac.il
Uzzi Ornan
Affiliation:
Computer Science Department, Technion Haifa 32000, Israel Email: shuly@cs.technion.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due to recent developments in the area of computational formalisms for linguistic representation, the task of designing a parser for a specified natural language is now shifted to the problem of designing its grammar in certain formal ways. This paper describes the results of a project whose aim was to design a formal grammar for modern Hebrew. Such a formal grammar has never been developed before. Since most of the work on grammatical formalisms was done without regarding Hebrew (and other Semitic languages as well), we had to choose a formalism that would best fit the specific needs of the language. This part of the project has been described elsewhere. In this paper we describe the details of the grammar we developed. The grammar deals with simple, subordinate and coordinate sentences as well as interrogative sentences. Some structures were thoroughly dealt with, among which are noun phrases, verb phrases, adjectival phrases, relative clauses, object and adjunct clauses; many types of adjuncts; subcategorization of verbs; coordination; numerals, etc. For each phrase the parser produces a description of the structure tree of the phrase as well as a representation of the syntactic relations in it. Many examples of Hebrew phrases are demonstrated, together with the structure the parser assigns them. In cases where more than one parse is produced, the reasons of the ambiguity are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Natural Language Engineering , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 261 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentur, E., Angel, A. and Segev, D. (1992a) Computerized analysis of Hebrew words. Hebrew Linguistics 36: 33–38, December. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Bentur, E., Angel, A., Segev, D. and Lavie, A. (1992b) Analysis and generation of the nouns inflection in Hebrew. In: Ornan, Uzzi, Arieli, Gideon and Doron, Edit, editors, Hebrew Computational Linguistics, pp 36–38, Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Chayen, M. J. and Dror, Z. (1976) Introduction to Hebrew Transformational Grammar. University Publishing Projects Ltd., Jerusalem. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Choueka, Y. (1993) Response to ‘Computerized analysis of Hebrew words’. Hebrew Linguistics 37(87), December. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Choueka, Y. and Ne'eman, Y. (1995) ‘Nakdan-T’, a text vocalizer for modern Hebrew. Proceedings of the Fourth Bar-Han Symposium on Foundations of Artificial Intelligence,June.Google Scholar
Glinert, L. (1989) The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (1989) Generation and inflection of the possession inflection of Hebrew nouns. Master's thesis, Technion, Haifa, Israel. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. and Bresnan, J. (1982) Lexical functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J., editor, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp 173–281, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lavie, A., Itai, A., Oman, U. and Rimon, M. (1988) On the applicability of two-level morphology to the inflection of Hebrew verbs. Technical Report 513, Department of Computer Science, Technion, Israel.Google Scholar
McCord, M. (1989) A new version of slot grammar. Research Report RC 14506, IBM.Google Scholar
Ornan, U. (1979) The Simple Sentence. Academon, Jerusalem, Israel. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Ornan, U. (1986) Phonemic script: A central vehicle for processing natural language - the case of Hebrew. Technical Report 88.181, IBM Research Center, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
Ornan, U. (1994) Basic concepts in ‘romanization’ of scripts. Technical Report LCL 94–5, Laboratory for Computational Linguistics, Technion, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
Ornan, U. and Katz, M. (1995) A new program for Hebrew index based on the Phonemic Script. Technical Report LCL 94–7, Laboratory for Computational Linguistics, Technion, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
Rosenschein, S. J. and Shieber, S. M. (1982) Translating English into logical form. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany-Klein, M. (1990) Generation and analysis of segolate noun inflection in Hebrew. Master's thesis, Technion, Haifa, Israel. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Shieber, S. M. (1986) An Introduction to Unification Based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes.Google Scholar
Tomita, M. (1988) The generalized LR parser/compiler: User's guide. CMT memo, Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Tomita, M. (1990) The generalized LR parser/compiler v8-4: A software package for practical NL projects. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Computational Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintner, S. (1991) Syntactic analysis of Hebrew sentences. Master's thesis, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. (In Hebrew, abstract in English.)Google Scholar
Wintner, S. and Ornan, U. (1991) Computational models for syntactic analysis - their fitness for writing a computational grammar for Hebrew. CIS Report 9103, Center for Intelligent Systems, Technion, Israel.Google Scholar