Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:33:41.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Pride and the Insecure Social Bond between People and the State: The Socio-emotional Context of National Identity in Post-Soviet Neoliberal Latvia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2023

Iveta Ķešāne Open the ORCID record for Iveta Ķešāne [Opens in a new window]
Iveta Ķešāne*
Affiliation:
Latvian Academy of Culture, Rīga, Latvia
*
Email: iveta.kesane@lka.edu.lv
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the socio-emotional dimension of national belonging in post-Soviet neoliberal Latvia from the perspective of national pride. I propose this perspective since national pride shapes the character of national belonging. Studies show that national pride in socioeconomic and political attainment is low in post-Soviet countries and Latvia particularly. Influenced by social bond and commitment theories, this study explores why this might be the case by establishing national pride as a relational emotion of national belonging. For understanding national pride it is not enough to explore how people relate to their states. It is also necessary to understand how the states relate to their people, whether they recognize their state constituents, their needs and feel pride in them, and whether they shape social bonds among people. This study explores this question: how does the character of state-society relationship accounts for the low national pride in post-Soviet neoliberal Latvia? To answer, I combine the analysis of the post-Soviet civil discourse and an in-depth exploration of the narratives of 59 emigrants that have left Latvia toward the West in the post-Soviet era. The bonds formed between the Latvian political elite and Western countries during the post-Soviet transformations brought into Latvia neoliberal ideas and policies that, I argue, formed an insecure state-society bond, eroding an opportunity for national pride to flourish and weakening national belonging.

Keywords

national prideemotionsocial bond national identityneoliberalismLatvia
Type
Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aidukaite, Jolanta. 2009. “The Transformation of Welfare Systems in the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.” In Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorising Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Cerami, Alfio and Vanhuysse, Pieter, 96–112. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aistara, Guntra A. 2014. “Latvia’s Tomato Rebellion: Nested Environmental Justice and Returning Eco-sociality in the Post-socialist EU Countryside.” Journal of Baltic Studies 45 (1): 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Smith, Philip. 1993. “The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies.” Theory and Society 22 (2):151–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altheide, David, Coyle, Michael, DeVriese, Katie, and Schneider, Christopher. 2008 “Emergent Qualitative Document Analysis.” In Handbook of Emergent Methods, edited by Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy and Leavy, Patricia, 127–154. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Appel, Hilary, and Orenstein, Mitchell A.. 2016. “Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World?” Comparative Politics 48 (3): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna, and Eyal, Gil. 2002. “Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (2): 310–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee, and Greskovits, Béla. 2007. “Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism and Neocorporatism: Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 30: 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart. 2016. “Nationalism in Settled Times.” Annual Review of Sociology 42: 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A., and Cohen, Joseph N.. 2012. “The Arc of Neoliberalism.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chelcea, Liviu, and Druţǎ, Oana. 2016. “Zombie Socialism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (4–5): 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzenovska, Dace. 2020. “Emptiness: Capitalism Without People in the Latvian Countryside.” American Ethnologist 47 (1): 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglitis, Daina Stukuls, and Lāce, Taņa. 2009. “Stratification and the Poverty of Progress in Post-communist Latvian capitalism.” Acta Sociologica 52 (4): 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglitis, Daina Stukuls. 2002. Imagining the Nation: History, Modernity, and Revolution in Latvia. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2010. “Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Mariah D., and Kelley, Jonathan. 2002. “National Pride in the Developed World: Survey Data from 24 Nations.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 (3): 303–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrykant, Marharyta, and Magun, Vladimir. 2016. “Grounded and Normative Dimensions of National Pride in Comparative Perspective.” In Dynamics of National Identity: Media and Societal Factors of What We Are, edited by Grimm, J., Huddy, L., Schmidt, P., and Seethaler, O., 83–113. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrykant, Marharyta. 2018. “National Identity in the Contemporary Baltics: Comparative Quantitative Analysis.” Journal of Baltic Studies 49 (3): 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto. 1998. “Narrative Analysis – or Why (and How) Sociologists Should Be Interested in Narrative.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 517–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailis, Māris. 1993. Interviewed by A. Jakubāns and Ē. Hānbergs. Neatkarīgā Cīņa, January 6: 1–2.Google Scholar
Garni, Alisa, and Weyher, L. Frank. 2013. “Dollars, ‘Free Trade,’ and Migration: The Combined Forces of Alienation in Postwar El Salvador.” Latin American Perspectives 40 (5): 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, Shang E., and Jang, Seung-Jin. 2015. “National Identity, National Pride, and Happiness: The Case of South Korea.” Social Indicators Research 121 (2): 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazans, Mihails. 2015. “Emigrācija no Latvijas 21. gadsimtā reģionu, pilsētu un novadu griezumā.” In Latvijas emigrantu kopienas: Cerību diaspora, edited by Mieriņa, Inta, 11–26. Rīga: LU Filosofijas un Socioloģijas institūts.Google Scholar
Hjerm, Mikael. 2003. “National Sentiments in Eastern and Western Europe.” Nationalities Papers 31 (4): 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illouz, Eva. 2011. “Book Review: Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (5), 1672–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2018. The Emotions of Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurkāns, Jānis. 1991. Neatkarība pašlaik ir dekorācija. Interviewed by M. Klišāns. Neatkarīgā Cīņa, November 15: 1–2.Google Scholar
Kane, Anne. 2000. “Reconstructing Culture in Historical Explanation: Narratives as Cultural Structure and Practice.” History and Theory 39 (3): 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaprāns, Mārtiņs. 2015. “Latviešu emigranti Lielbritānijā: transnacionalā identitāte un attālinātā nacionālisma konteksti.” In Latvijas emigrantu kopienas. Cerību diaspora, edited by Mieriņa, Inta, 108–128. Rīga: LU Filosofijas un Socioloģijas institūts.Google Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 1994. Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy. The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia. Washington, D.C.: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koroļeva, Ilze. 2019. “The Complex Identities of Latvians Abroad: What Shapes a Migrant’s Sense of Belonging?” In The Emigrant Communities of Latvia, edited by Kaša, Rita and Mieriņa, Inta, 69–95. Cham: Springer Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosterman, Rick, and Feshbach, Seymour. 1989. “Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes.” Political Psychology 10 (2): 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krištopans, Vilis. 1999. “Mani aizstāv tie, kas uzskata – zagt nedrīkst.” Interview with Vilis Krištopāns. Interviewed by Ilona Klinšāne and Aldis Bērziņš. Neatkarīgā Rīta Avīze, May 19: 10.Google Scholar
Ķešāne, Iveta 2011. “Emigration and Identity.” In Latvia. Human Development Report 2010/2011. National Identity, Mobility and Capability, edited by Zepa, Brigita and Kļave, Evija, 70–77. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskais apgāds. Available: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/805.Google Scholar
Ķešāne, Iveta. 2016. “Symbolic Structure of the Post-Soviet Transformations in Latvia and Emigration: Avoiding Shame and Striving for Confidence.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KSGoogle Scholar
Ķešāne, Iveta. 2019. “The Lived Experience of Inequality and Migration: Emotions and Meaning Making among Latvian Emigrants.” Emotion, Space and Society 33 (November): online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ķešāne, Iveta. 2021. “Neoliberalization and Politics of Shaming: Ruling Elites’ Response to Protests by Schoolteachers and Farmers in Post-Soviet Latvia (1994–2000).” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 54 (1–2): 102–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ķešāne, Iveta., and Weyher, Frank L.. 2021. (Self-)confidence, Migration, and the State: A Study of Emigration from Latvia. Social Currents 8 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 2019. “From ‘Having’ to ‘Being’: Self‐worth and the Current Crisis of American Society.” The British Journal of Sociology 70 (3): 660–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, Michèle, and Swidler, Ann. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., Thye, Shane R., and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 2009. Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Leiškalns, Kārlis. 1995. “Liberālisms ir ceļš uz saglabātajām vērtībām.” Diena, July 31: 2.Google Scholar
Meitinger, Katharina. 2018. “What Does the General National Pride Item Measure? Insights from Web Probing.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 59 (5–6): 428–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller‐Idriss, Cynthia, and Rothenberg, Bess. 2012. “Ambivalence, Pride and Shame: Conceptualisations of German Nationhood.” Nations and Nationalism 18 (1): 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miķelsone, Anda, and Ločmele, Nellija. 1994. “Skolotāji gatavi sākt streiku.” Diena, November 29: 1.Google Scholar
Mole, R. C. M. 2012. The Baltic States from the Soviet Union to the European Union: Identity, Discourse, and Power in the Post-Communist Transition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, Linda D. 2012. “Book Review: Work and Employment Relations: Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World.” ILR Review 65 (1): 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Peters, Anke. 1998. “The Significance of National Pride and National Identity to the Attitude Toward the Single European Currency: A Europe-Wide Comparison.” Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (6): 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissinen, Marja. 1999. Latvia’s Transition to a Market Economy: Political Determinants of Economic Reform Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2017. PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Wellbeing. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Özkırımlı, Umut. 2010. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ozoliņa, Liene. 2019. “Would You Flee, or Would You Fight? Tracing the Tensions at the Latvian-Russian Border.” Slavic Review 78 (2): 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riessman, Catherine Kohler. 2005. “Narrative Analysis.” In Narrative, Memory & Everyday Life, edited by Kelly, Nancy, Horrocks, Christine, Milnes, Kate, Roberts, Brian, and Robinson, David, 1–7. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.Google Scholar
RSU. 2022. “Starptautiskā diskusijā pētnieki analizēs iedzīvotāju gatavību aizsargāt valsti.” September 29, https://www.rsu.lv/aktualitates/starptautiska-diskusija-petnieki-analizes-iedzivotaju-gatavibu-aizsargat-valsti (Accessed January 16, 2023.)Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 1994. Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism, and War. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. 2008. Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siliņš, Elmārs. 1993. Interviewed by A. Jakubāns and Ē. Hānbergs. Neatkarīgā Cīņa, March 19: 1–2.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom W., and Kim, Seokho. 2006. “National Pride in Comparative Perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1):127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Jeffrey. 2009. “The Anglo-American Model of Economic Organization and Governance: Entropy and the Fragmentation of Social Solidarity in Twenty-first Century Latvia.” Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 17 (2): 127–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 1992. “Reflections on the Role of Social Narratives in Working-class Formation: Narrative Theory.” Social Science History 16 (3): 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenning, Alison, Smith, Adrian, Rochovská, Alena, and Świątek, Dariusz. 2010. Domesticating Neo-liberalism: Spaces of Economic Practice and Social Reproduction in Post-socialist cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdības preses dienesta paziņojums. 1994. “Valdība zina un saprot izglītības sistēmas grūtības.” Neatkarīgā Cīņa, November 25: 1.Google Scholar
Valujevs, Guntis. 1993a. Racionāla ekonomika un siliueti miglā I. Diena, April 1: 2Google Scholar
Valujevs, Guntis. 1993b. Racionāla ekonomika un siliueti miglā II. Diena, April 2: 2Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlachová, Klára. 2019. “‘This Country Is Not for Anyone’: Explanations of Low National Pride in the Czech Republic.” Nationalities Papers 47 (6): 1000–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard, and Pickett, Kate. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Zepa, Brigita. 2001. “Confidence in Institutions: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.” In Political Representation and Participation in Transitory Democracies: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, edited by Loftsson, Elfar and Choe, Yonhyok, 63–85. Stockholm: Soedertorn University.Google Scholar