Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:42:38.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnicization or de-ethnicization? Hungarian political representation in the Romanian parliament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Tibor Toró Open the ORCID record for Tibor Toró [Opens in a new window]
Tibor Toró*
Affiliation:
European Studies Department, Sapientia – Hungarian University of Transylvania, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: torotibor@sapientia.ro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main goal of the paper is to understand how substantive representation of minorities works through ethnic parties and what the relationship between substantive and descriptive representation is in this specific case. Focus on the traditional understanding of substantive representation is common when analyzing the representation of minorities and marginalized groups, but only a few studies look at the substantive representation of national minorities from a constructivist approach, and even fewer are centered on Central and Eastern Europe. The paper argues that besides ethnicizing their demands, representatives of minorities have a wide array of strategies to achieve their goals. Using the parliamentary representation of Hungarians in Romania as a case study, I show that the strategies chosen in ethnic claims-making are context-dependent: ethnicizing messages are used only in specific cases, while de-ethnicization is applied in debates thought to be important for their community. These are part of a bargaining process that help representatives to achieve their goals. Thus, the paper broadens the debate on substantive representation and has implications in coding, as most of the studies addressing the issue assume that descriptive representatives, in order to provide substantive representation, must ethnicize their demands.

Keywords

descriptive representationsubstantive representationethnic partiesminoritiesHungarians in Romania
Type
Special Section: Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges Guest Editors: Licia Cianetti and Jelena Lončar
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 219 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alionescu, Ciprian-Calin. 2004. “Parliamentary Representation of Minorities in Romania.” Southeast European Politics 5 (1): 60–75.Google Scholar
Bakk, Miklós. 1999. “Az RMDSZ mint a romániai magyarság politikai önmeghatározási kísérlete 1989 után.” Regio 10 (2): 81–116.Google Scholar
Bakk, Miklós, and Gergő Székely, István. 2012. “Egy regionalista vegyes párt esélyeiről Erdélyben.” Magyar Kisebbség XVII (1–2): 7–50.Google Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2007. “Patterns of Substantive Representation among Visible Minority MPs: Evidence from Canada's House of Commons.” Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 2007.Google Scholar
Biró, A. Zoltán. 1998. “Kormányon a kisebbség. A kormánybalépés egy éve a magyar-magyar reláció szemszögéből.” In Stratégia vagy kényszerpályák? Tanulmányok a romániai magyar társadalomról, edited by Zoltán Biró, A., 139–156. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
Black, Jerome H., and Hicks, M. B. 2006. “Visible Minorities and Under-representation: The Views of Candidates.” Electoral Insight 8 (2): 17–23.Google Scholar
Bochsler, Daniel, and Szöcsik, Edina. 2013. “Building Inter-ethnic Bridges or Promoting Ethno-territorial Demarcation Lines? Hungarian Minority Parties in Competition.” Nationalities Papers 41 (5): 761–779.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794–812.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen. 2008. “Studying Women's Substantive Representation in Legislatures: When Representative Acts, Contexts and Women's Interests Become Important.” Representation 44(2): 111–123.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2008. “Introduction: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 419–425.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Lena Krook, Mona. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.Google Scholar
Csergo, Zsuzsa. 2007. Talk of the Nation: Language and Conflict in Romania and Slovakia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. “Orders of Discourse.” Social Science Information 10 (2): 7–30.Google Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity Within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–447.Google Scholar
Hodžić, Edin, and Mraović, Boriša. 2015. “Political Representation of Minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina: How Reserved Seats Affect Minority Representatives’ Influence on Decisionmaking and Perceived Substantive Representation.” Ethnopolitics 14 (4): 418–434.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horváth, István. 2002. “Facilitating Conflict Transformation: Implementation of the Recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities to Romania, 1993–2001.” Working Paper 8. Hamburg: CORE.Google Scholar
Kántor, Zoltán, and Bárdi, Nándor. 2002. “The Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania (DAHR) in the Government of Romania from 1996 to 2000.” Regio. Minorities, Politics, Society: 188–226.Google Scholar
King, Ronald F., and Gabriel Marian, Cosmin. 2012. “Minority Representation and Reserved Legislative Seats in Romania.” East European Politics & Societies 26 (3): 561–588.Google Scholar
Kiss, Tamás. 2014. “Mi van az etnikai szavazat mögött? Az erdélyi magyarok választói viselkedését meghatározó tényezők.” Pro Minoritaté 3: 153–189.Google Scholar
Kiss, Tamás, and Gergő Székely, István. 2016. “Shifting Linkages in Ethnic Mobilization: The Case of RMDSZ and the Hungarians in Transylvania.” Nationalities Papers 44 (4): 591–610.Google Scholar
Loncar, Jelena. 2016. “Electoral Accountability and Substantive Representation of National Minorities: The Case of Serbia.” East European Politics & Societies and Cultures 30 (4): 703–724.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–528.Google Scholar
Marian, Cosmin Gabriel, and King, Ronald F. 2010. “Plus Ça Change: Electoral Law Reform and the 2008 Romanian Parliamentary Elections.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43 (1): 7–18.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2012. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Political Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 8 (2): 541–547.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2013. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–140.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh. 2010. “Making Effective Use of Parliamentary Representation.” In Political Participation of Minorities: A Commentary on International Standards and Practice, edited by Weller, Marc, 400–413. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh, and Sachariew, Konstantin. 2010. “Recruitment and Representation of Ethnic Minorities under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Bulgaria.” East European Politics & Societies 26 (2): 313–339.Google Scholar
Romániai Magyar Demokrata Szövetség. 2013. “Az RMDSZ programja.” Csíkszereda.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–2010.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 271–289.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas, and Bischof, Daniel. 2013. “Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005–2011.” Parliamentary Affairs 66 (2): 305–328.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2008. “The Subject of Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 93–97.Google Scholar
Severs, Eline. 2010. ““Representation as Claims-making. Quid Responsiveness?” Representation 46 (4): 411–423.Google Scholar
Severs, Eline. 2012. “Substantive Representation through a Claims-making Lens: A Strategy for the Identification and Analysis of Substantive Claims.” Representation 48 (2): 169–181.Google Scholar
Stroschein, Sherrill. 2011. “Demography in Ethnic Party Fragmentation: Hungarian Local Voting in Romania.” Party Politics 17 (2): 189–204.Google Scholar
Székely, István Gergő. 2009. “Egyéni választókerületes többségi rendszer arányos kimenetellel? Románia új választási rendszere.” Pro Minoritaté 18 (1): 7–33.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zuber, Chritina Isabel. 2015. “Reserved Seats, Political Parties, and Minority Representation.” Ethnopolitics 14 (4): 390–403.Google Scholar