Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:05:37.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Carpathian Folk Fairs and the Origins of National Consciousness among Romanians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gheorghiţă Geană
Gheorghiţă Geană*
Affiliation:
Anthropological Research Centre, Romanian Academy; Faculty of Sociology, University of Bucharest, Romania gheorghita_geana2003@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A series of time-honoured regular folk fairs take place in the Carpathian Mountains that are mainly economic but also socio-cultural events. The participants come from all the three Romanian principalities—Moldavia, Wallachia, and Transylvania, that is, from all the historical provinces of the Romanian state as constituted after the First World War. These folk fairs are “two-land fairs” in the Eastern and Southern Carpathians and “three-land fairs” where all three provinces converge, as in the district of Vrancea. Over the centuries, such fairs advanced the perception that participants spoke the same language, shared the same religious belief, and belonged to the same neam, that is, implicitly to the same territory (the word neam being a vernacular term for “kin group,” but extensible to the notion of “people” and “nation”). In short, the folk fairs contributed to awakening Romanian national consciousness. Such evidence challenges modernist theory, according to which national consciousness should have arisen with the bourgeoise elite, who should have inculcated it into the public mind.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 91 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ancel, Jacques. Peuples et Nations des Balkans (Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1926).Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London and New York: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar
Armbruster, Adolf. La Romanité des Roumains. L'histoire d'une idée, trans. from Romanian by Cireaşa (Grecescu: Editura Academiei RSR, 1977).Google Scholar
Bawr, F. W. de. Mémoires historiques et géographiques sur la Valachie, avec un Prospectus d'un Atlas Géographique et Militaire … (Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1778).Google Scholar
Caragiu-Marioteanu, Matilda. “Varietatea limbii române” [The differentiation of the Romanian language], in Română, Academia, ed., Limba română şi varietăţile ei locale [The Romanian language and its local variants] (Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1995), pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
Chelcea, Ion. “Vrancea ca ‘ţară’ intre celelalte: individualitatea sa etnografică” [Vrancea as a “ţară” among the other ones: its ethnographical individuality”], in Muzeul Judeţean de Istorie şi Etnografie Vrancea [Historical and Ethnographical Museum of the Vrancea District], ed., Studii şi comunicări [Studies and papers], Vol. 1, 1978, pp. 167–180.Google Scholar
Conea, Ion. “Sugestii şi indicaţii geoistorice pentru numirea şi determinarea marilor unităţi administrative ale României: ‘pagus,’ ‘pays,’ ‘jupa,’ ‘ţară’” [Geohistorical reflections and proposals for the determination and designation of the great administrative units in Romania: “pagus,” “pays,” “jupa,” “ţară“], Sociologie Românească [Romanian sociology], Vol. 3, Nos 4–6, 1938, pp. 239–246.Google Scholar
Conea, Ion. Pe urmele descălecatului din sud [Following the settling down in south] (Bucharest: Tipografiile Române Unite, 1940).Google Scholar
Conea, Ion. “Vechile târguri-nedei de pe culmile Carpaţilor” [The ancient nedei-fairs on the Carpathian heights], Buletin ştiinţific, Secţia de ştiinţe geologice şi geograflce [Scientific newsletter, section of geological and geographical sciences], Vol. 2, No. 1, 1957, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
Connor, Walker. “The Nation and Its Myth”, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 33, Nos 1–2, 1992, pp. 48–57.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. “Unitatea limbii române: planuri şi criterii” [The unity of the Romanian language: levels and criteria], in Academia Română (ed.), Limba română şi varietăţile ei locale [The Romanian language and its local variants] (Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1995), pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Dalton, George. Economic Theory and Primitive Society, American Anthropologist, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1961, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Eicher, Joanne B. “Introduction: Dress as Expression of Ethnic Identity,” in Joanne B. Eicher, ed., Dress and Ethnicity. Change across Space and Time (Oxford and Washington: Berg, 1995a), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Eicher, Joanne B., ed. Dress and Ethnicity. Change across Space and Time (Oxford and Washington: Berg, 1995b).Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. De Zalmoxis à Gengis-Khan. Études comparatives sur les religions et le folklore de la Dacie et de l'Europe Orientale (Paris: Payot, 1970).Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. Ethnicity and Nationalism. Anthropological Perspectives (London and Boulder, CO: Pluto Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Florescu, Florea. “Târgul de pe Muntele Găina” [The fair of the Găina Mountain], Sociologie Românească [Romanian sociology], Vol. 2, Nos 9–10, 1937, pp. 418–430.Google Scholar
Florus, Publius Annaeus. Fragments, in Fontes Historiae Dacoromanae, Vol. 1 (Bucharest: Editura Academiei RSR, 1964), pp. 524–525.Google Scholar
Geană, Gheorghiţă. “Arnold Van Gennep şi folclorul românesc” [Arnold Van Gennep and the Romanian folklore], Luceafărul [Evening Star], Vol. 23, No. 30, 1980, pp. 1, 7.Google Scholar
Geană, Gheorghiţă. “Les projets roumains d'Arnold Van Gennep”, Ethnologica, Vol. 3, 1983, pp. 33–44.Google Scholar
Geană, Gheorghiţă. “Străvechiul izolat Vrancea in lumina antropologiei” [The ancient zonal isolate of Vrancea in the light of anthropology], Vrancea. Studii şi comunicări [Vrancea. Studies and papers], Vols 5–6, 1987, pp. 115–126.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “The integrative revolution: primordial sentiments and civil politics in the new states,” in Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), pp. 205–309.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. Culture, Identity, and Politics (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Govers, Cora and Vermeulen, Hans, eds. The Politics of Ethnic Consciousness (London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Grosby, Steven. “The Verdict of History: The Inexpungeable Tie of Primordiality—A Response to Eller and Coughlan,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1994, pp. 164–171.Google Scholar
Grosby, Steven. “Territoriality: The Transcendental, Primordial Feature of Modern Societies,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1995, pp. 143–162.Google Scholar
Grothe, Hugo. Zur Landeskunde von Rumänien. Kulturgeschichtliches u. Wirtschaftliches (Halle: Gebauer–Schwetschke Druckerei und Verlag, 1907).Google Scholar
Hamilton, William D. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, No. 7, 1964, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Melville J. Economic Anthropology (New York: W. W. Norton, 1952).Google Scholar
Hitchins, Keith. A Nation Discovered. Romanian Intellectuals in Transylvania and the Idea of Nation, 1700–1848 (Bucharest: Encyclopaedic Publishing House and Romanian Cultural Foundation, 1999).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds. The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Holmes, Warren G. and Sherman, Paul W. “Kin Recognition in Animals,” American Scientist, Vol. 71, 1983, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John. “Moral Innovators and the Politics of Regeneration: The Distinctive Role of Cultural Nationalists in Nation-Building,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 33, Nos 1–2, 1992, pp. 101–117.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gary R. “Kin Selection, Socialization, and Patriotism: An Integrating Theory,” Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1986, pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gary R. “In the Name of the Fatherland: An Analysis of Kin Term Usage in Patriotic Speech and Literature,” International Political Science Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1987, pp. 165–174.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gary R., Ratwik, Susan H., and Sawyer, Timothy J. “The Evocative Significance of Kin Terms in Patriotic Speech,” in Reynolds, Vernon, Falger, Vincent, and Vine, Ian, eds, The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism: Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism (London: Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 157–174.Google Scholar
Jones, Siân. The Archaeology of Ethnicity. Constructing Identities in the Past and Present (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Liebich, Andre. “Must Nations Become States?” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2003, pp. 453–469.Google Scholar
Llobera, Josep R. The God of Modernity. The Development of Nationalism in Western Europe (Oxford and Providence: Berg, 1994).Google Scholar
MacKendrick, Paul. Pietrele dacilor vorbesc (Bucharest: Editura ştiinţifică şi enciclopedică, 1978). Translated from The Dacian Stones Speak (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Marian, Sim. Fl. Sărbătorile la români [Romanians’ feasts], Vol. 3 (Bucharest: Institutul de Arte Grafice Carol Göbl, 1901), pp. 337–340.Google Scholar
Martonne, Emmanuel de. La Valachie. Essai de monographie géographique (Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1902).Google Scholar
Mayer, Philip and Mayer, Iona. “A Dangerous Age: From Boy to Young Man in Red Xhosa Youth Organisations,” in Spencer, Paul, ed., Anthropology and the Riddle of the Sphinx. Paradoxes of Change in the Life Course (London and New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. Coming of Age in Samoa (New York: Mentor, 1961).Google Scholar
Mehedinţi, Simion. Terra. Introducere in geografie ca ştiinţă [Terra. Introduction to geography as a science], Vol. 1 (Bucharest: Editura “Naţionala” S. Ciornei, 1931).Google Scholar
Mehedinţi, Simion. Le pays et le peuple roumain. Considérations de géographie physique et de géographie humaine (Bucharest: Académie Roumaine, 1937).Google Scholar
Mehedinţi, Simion. Creştinismul românesc [Romanian Christianity] (Bucharest: Cugetarea–Georgescu Delafras, 1941).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Le primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques (Lagrasse, France: Éditions Verdier, 1996).Google Scholar
New Encyclopaedia Britannica. “Hasdeu, Bogdan Petriceicu,” 15th edn, Vol. 5, 1992a, pp. 736–737.Google Scholar
New Encyclopaedia Britannica. “Hora,” 15th edn, Vol. 6, 1992b, p. 57.Google Scholar
Pârvan, Vasile. Dacia. An Outline of the Early Civilizations of the Carpatho-Danubian Countries (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Penrose, Jan. 2002 “Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2002, pp. 277–297.Google Scholar
Petecel, Stella. Agonistica in viaţa spirituală a cetăţii antice [Agonistics in the spiritual life of the ancient Greek city] (Bucharest: Editura Meridiane, 2002).Google Scholar
Petrovici, Emil. “La population de la Transylvanie au XI-e siecle,” Revue de Transylvanie, Vol. 10, Nos 1–2, 1944, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
Pirenne, Henri. “Aspects of Medieval European Economy,” in Dalton, George, ed., Tribal and Peasant Economies. Readings in Economic Anthropology (New York: Natural History Press, 1967), pp. 418–437.Google Scholar
Pittard, Eugène. Les races et l'histoire (Paris: La Renaissance du livre, 1924).Google Scholar
Roosens, Eugeen E. Creating Ethnicity. The Process of Ethnogenesis (London: Sage, 1989).Google Scholar
Rusu Abrudeanu, Ion. Moţii. Calvarul unui popor eroic, dar nedreptăţit [The Motzi. Calvary of a heroic and oppressed people] (Bucharest: Cartea Românească, 1928).Google Scholar
Sala, Marius. “Unitatea limbii române din perspectivă romanică” [The unity of the Romanian language in Romanic perspective], in Română, Academia, ed., Limba română şi varietăţile ei locale [The Romanian language and its local variants] (Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1995), pp. 113–118.Google Scholar
Seeger, Anthony. “Music and Dance,” in Tim Ingold, ed., Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), pp. 686–705.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. “Primordial, Personal, Sacred and Civil Ties,” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1957, pp. 130–145.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. Ethnic Origins of Nations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. National Identity (London and New York: Penguin, 1991).Google Scholar
Smooha, Sammy. “Ethnic Groups,” in Kuper, Adam and Kuper, Jessica, eds, The Social Science Encyclopedia (London and New York: Routledge, 1989), pp. 267–269.Google Scholar
Stahl, Paul H. “‘Pays’ et communautés de vallée”, Revue roumaine dhistoire, Vol. 37, Nos 3–4, 1998, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
Stănculescu, Petre and Serafim, Gh. “La foire de Vidra–Putna,” Archives pour la science et la réforme sociale, Vol. 16, Nos 1–4, 1943, pp. 221–259.Google Scholar
Stoicescu, Nicolae. Continuitatea românilor. Istoricul problemei, dovezile continuităţii [The continuity of the Romanian people. The history of the problem and the evidence of continuity] (Bucharest: Editura ştiinţifică şi enciclopedică, 1980).Google Scholar
Stokes, Martin. “Introduction: Ethnicity, Identity and Music,” in Stokes, Martin, ed., Ethnicity, Identity and Music. The Musical Construction of Place (Oxford and Providence: Berg, 1994), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Strabo. Strabonis Geographia, Vol. 2: VII, 3, 11 (Recognovit Augustus Meinecke. Lipsiae, Sumptibus et typis B. G., Teubneri, [Leipzig], 1853).Google Scholar
Vâlsan, George. “Nedeile de pe culmile Carpaţilor” [The nedei from the Carpathian heights], in George Vâlsan, Opere alese [Selected works] (Bucharest: Editura ştiinţifică, 1971), pp. 655–659.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, P. L. “Race and Ethnicity: A Sociobiological Perspective,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1978, pp. 401–411.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. Peasants into Frenchmen. The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. “Elements of a Theory of Ukrainian Ethno-national Identities,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, 31–54.Google Scholar