Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:21:27.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Appropriating Memory in the Name of the State

Review products

Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance after Communism, by SubotićJelena, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2019, 264 pp., $29.95 (hardcover), ISBN 978-1501742408.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2023

Tamara P. Trošt Open the ORCID record for Tamara P. Trošt [Opens in a new window]
Tamara P. Trošt*
Affiliation:
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Email: tamara.trost@ef.uni-lj.si
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jelena Subotić’s Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance after Communism has already received such broad recognition and numerous awards that its invaluable contribution to memory studies likely does not need repeating. It is not only a study of Holocaust remembrance in particular, but contributes broadly to our understanding of memory appropriation by the state, through a careful and vivid analysis of its transformation over time in several Eastern and Central European countries. Subotić provides a study of how memory can serve as a strategic tool for reinforcing state interests. The central argument of the book is that the states in question – Croatia, Lithuania, and Serbia – engage in memory appropriation in order to qualify their ontological insecurities (14). The strategies include “memory inversion,” appropriating the Holocaust to emphasize crimes against them (primarily in Serbia), “memory divergence,” placing blame for the genocide on German Nazis (Croatia), or “memory conflation,” wherein Holocaust memory is combined and equated with Communist crimes (Lithuania, 15). These appropriation strategies, which overlap and are combined in the various states, allow states to paint themselves as the ultimate victims, absolving them of responsibility for their role in Holocaust crimes. The danger, of course, is that this not only set ups the false equivalence between victims of Communism and of the Holocaust, allowing for the relativization of Nazi collaboration as anti-Communist resistance, but also because it banalizes and trivializes the specific suffering of the Jewish population.

Type
Book Symposium
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 225 - 229
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashplant, Timothy G., Dawson, Graham, and Roper, Michael. 2004. “The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration: Contexts, Structures and Dynamics.” In Commemorating War: The Politics of Memory, edited by Ashplant, Timothy G., Dawson, Graham, and Roper, Michael, 3–85. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bajford, Jovan. 2009. Staro Sajmište: Mesto sećanja, zaborava i sporenja. Belgrade: Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.Google Scholar
Đureinović, Jelena. 2020. The Politics of Memory of the Second World War in Contemporary Serbia: Collaboration, Resistance and Retribution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lazić, Slađana. 2011. “The Re-evaluation of Milan Nedić and Draža Mihailović in Serbia.” In Serbia and the Serbs in World War Two, edited by Ramet, Sabrina P. and Listhaug, Ola, 265–282. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Daniel. 2010. “Changing Temporalities and the Internationalization of Memory Cultures.” In Memory and the Future: Transnational Politics, Ethics and Society, edited by Gutman, Yifat, Brown, Adam D., and Sodaro, Amy, 15–30. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milošević, Ana. 2019. Signaling Values: Europeanisation and Memory Politics in Croatia and Serbia. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Leuven, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Milošević, Ana. 2017. “Back to the Future, Forward to the past: Croatian Politics of Memory in the European Parliament.” Nationalities Papers 45 (5): 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milošević, Ana, and Trošt, Tamara. 2021. Europeanization and Memory Politics in the Western Balkans. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlaković, Vjeran. 2019. “Contested Sites and Fragmented Narratives: Jasenovac and Disruptions in Croatia’s Commemorative Culture.” In Framing the Nation and Collective Identity: Political Rituals and Cultural Memory of the Twentieth-Century Traumas in Croatia, edited by Pavlaković, Vjeran and Pauković, Davor, 119–139. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trbovc, Jovana Mihajlović, and Trošt, Tamara Pavasović. 2017. “Who Were the Anti-fascists? Divergent Interpretations of WWII in Contemporary Post-Yugoslav History Textbooks.” In The Use and Abuse of Memory, edited by Karner, Christian and Mertens, Bram, 173–191. New Brunswick: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremba, A. 2022. “Intervention, Return, and Reinterpretation: The Jasenovac Memorial Museum Collection, 1991–2006.” Contemporary European History, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar