Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T04:24:38.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The import content of expenditure components and the size of international spillovers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Markus Jorra ,
Andreas Esser  and
Ulf D. Slopek
Ulf D. Slopek
Affiliation:
Deutsche Bundesbank, Directorate General Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a large number of countries, we augment the specification of import demand in NiGEM by accounting for different import contents of individual expenditure components. Three examples illustrate that these changes have important implications for model outcomes. In the case of the recently enacted US tax reform and in a ‘hard landing’ scenario for China, spillovers become more pronounced while the domestic effects turn out more muted than in the default specification. The reverse is true for the ramifications of a public investment push in Germany. Hence, we believe that our add-on to NiGEM can be a useful tool for robustness exercises, in particular for spillover studies.

Keywords

NiGEMimport demandimport contentspilloversE37F14F17F44F47
Type
Research Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 244 , May 2018 , pp. R21 - R29
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Deutsche Bundesbank. The authors would like to thank Markus Kühnlenz, John Goodall, Johannes Hoffmann and an anonymous referee for their insightful comments.

References

Asian Development Bank (2016), Structural Change and Moderating Growth in the People's Republic of China: Implications for Developing Asia and Beyond, report prepared under an ADB technical assistance project, Asian Development Outlook 2016.Google Scholar
Baumann, U. and Dizioli, A.G. (2018), ‘The macroeconomic impact of the US tax reform’, ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 1/2018, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
Bussière, M., Callegari, G., Ghironi, F., Sestieri, G. and Yamano, N. (2013), ‘Estimating trade elasticities: demand composition and the trade collapse of 2008–2009’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5(3), pp. 118–151.Google Scholar
Carreras, O., Kirby, S., Liadze, I. and Piggott, R. (2016), ‘Fiscal policy spillovers’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper, No 468.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bundesbank (2015), ‘The international ripple effects of a severe economic slowdown in China’, Monthly Report, July, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bundesbank (2016a), ‘The international spillover effects of an expansion of public investment in Germany’, Monthly Report, August, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bundesbank (2016b), ‘On the weakness of global trade’, Monthly Report, March, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Deutsche Bundesbank (2018), ‘The potential macroeconomic impact of US tax reform’, Monthly Report, February, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
Dieppe, A., Gilhooly, R., Han, J., Korhonen, I. and Lodge, D. (eds) (2018), ‘The transition of China to sustainable growth – implications for the global economy and the euro area’, ECB, Occasional Paper Series, No 206.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2016), ‘Public investment in Europe’, ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 2, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016), ‘Country Report Germany 2016’, Commission Staff Working Document.Google Scholar
European Commission (2017), ‘US macroeconomic policies and spillovers to the Euro Area’, Spring 2017 European Economic Forecast, Institutional Paper 053, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2016), ‘2016 Article IV Staff Report: Germany’, IMF Country Report, No. 16/202.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2018), ‘Brighter prospects, optimistic markets, challenges ahead’, World Economic Outlook Update, January.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Taxation (2017), Estimated budget effects of the conference agreement for H.R. 1, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act“, JCX-67-17, cost estimate, 18 December.Google Scholar
Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G. J. (2015), ‘An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: the case of global automotive production’, Review of International Economics, 23, pp. 575–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar