Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T05:59:52.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five Years of the Modern Apprenticeship Initiative: An Assessment against Continental European Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Hilary Steedman
Hilary Steedman*
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Government has promised that Britain will build a vocational route based on apprenticeship to match that found in the rest of Europe. However, judged on the first five years of Modern Apprenticeship, every important aspect of apprenticeship in Britain will need to be strengthened and improved if the government's aspirations are to be realised.

‘Beyond compulsory school age, we are determined to build a coherent and high-quality vocational education and training system that is the envy of the world.’ [Opportunity and Skills in the Knowledge-Driven Economy, a final statement on the work of the National Skills Task Force from the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, 2001.]

Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 178 , October 2001 , pp. 75 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandsma, J. and Noonan, R. (2000), Transforming the Public Provision of Training: Reorganisation or Privatisation? Long-term Changes in Sweden and the Netherlands, Thessaloniki (Pylea), CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2000), Berufsbildungsbericht 2000.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten (1998), Die Lehre: Berufsausbildung in Österreich, Vienna.Google Scholar
CBI (2000), The CBI's response to the Modern Apprenticeships Consultation Document, London, Confederation of British Industry.Google Scholar
Coleman, N. and Williams, J. (1998), Evaluation of Modern Apprenticeships: 1998 Survey of Young People, Research Report 93, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Education (2000), The New Structure of the Danish Vocational Education and Training System, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
DfEE (1998), Evaluation of Modern Apprenticeships: 1998 Survey of Employers, Research Report 94, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
DfEE (1999), Second Report of the National Skills Task Force: Delivering Skills for All, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
DfEE (2000), Skills for all: Proposals for a National Skills Agenda, London, DfEE.Google Scholar
DfES (2001), Statistical First Release 28/2001,Google Scholar
Down, T. (1999), Developing Skills Policies in Six Countries, Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. (2001), ‘From cordwainers to customer service: the changing relationship between apprentices, employers and communities in England’, SKOPE Discussion Paper, Oxford and Warwick Universities, ISSN 1466-1535.Google Scholar
Hummelsheim, S. and Timmermann, D. (2000), The Financing of Vocational Education and Training in Germany: Financing Portrait, Thessaloniki (Pylea), CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
Jarvis, V. (1994), ‘Smoothing the transition to skilled employment: school-based vocational guidance in Britain and Continental Europe’, National Institute Economic Review, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassnigg, L. and Schneeberger, A. (1998), Thematic Review of the Transition from Initial Education to Working Life Country Background Report: Austria, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Michelet, V. (1995), Le Financement de la Formation et de l’ Enseignement Professionnel en France: Portrait de Financement, Thessaloniki (Pylea), CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'Education Nationale (2000), Repères et Références Statistiques 2000.Google Scholar
National Electrotechnical Training (1999), Report on a Skills and Labour Market Survey of the Electrotechnical Industry 1999, London, National Electrotechnical Training.Google Scholar
OECD (1998), Thematic Review of the Transition from Initial Education to Working Life Country Background Report: Denmark, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1999)Thematic Review of the Transition from Initial Education to Working Life Country Note: Denmark, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Payne, J. (2000), Student Success Rates in Post-16 Qualifications: Data from the England and Wales Youth Cohort Study, London, DfEE Research Report No. 272.Google Scholar
Richardson, W. (1998), ‘Work-based learning for young people: national policy, 1994-1997’, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, P. (1999), ‘The institutional attributes and requirements of apprenticeship: evidence from smaller EU countries’, University of Cambridge, mimeo.Google Scholar
Simon, G. (2001), ‘L'apprentissage: nouveaux territories, nouveaux usages’, CEREQ Bref No. 175, May.Google Scholar
Steedman, H. (1994), ‘Making decisions about education and training: a note on practice and procedures in careers guidance in France and Germany’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper no. 55.Google Scholar
Steedman, H. and Hawkins, J. (1994), ‘Shifting foundations: the impact of NVQs on youth training for the building trades’, National Institute Economic Review, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H., Green, A., Bertrand, O., Richter, A., Rubin, M. and Weber, K. (1996), Assessment, Qualifications and Standards: UK compared to France, Germany, Singapore and the US, Special report, London, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Training Standards Council (2000), Modern Apprenticeships: A Survey Report by the Training Standards Council, Oxford.Google Scholar