Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:05:24.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative in British and American Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Bart van Ark*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen

Abstract

This article presents the results of a benchmark comparison of the relative level of manufacturing productivity in the United Kingdom and the United States for 1987. It shows value added per hour worked in the UK at 58 per cent of the corresponding level in the United States. The UK appears to show relatively high productivity levels in basic goods industries, including textiles, chemicals and basic metals. The benchmark results are extrapolated backwards to 1968 and forwards to 1990, showing a narrowing of some ten percentage points of the productivity gap between the two countries. It is also shown that differences in capital intensity account for only a small part of the productivity gap.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am most grateful to Nienke Beintema for her assistance in making the detailed comparisons, and to Mary O'Mahony for providing me with a substantial part of the British data base. Comments on earlier drafts were made by Martin Baily, Andrew Britton, Steve Broadberry, Angus Maddison, Geoff Mason, Nicholas Oulton, Dirk Pilat, Sig Prais and by an anonymous referee, for which I am most grateful.

References

Ark, B. van (1990a), ‘Comparative levels of labour productivity in Dutch and British manufacturing’, National Institute Economic Review, No. 131, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ark, B. van (1990b), ‘Manufacturing productivity levels in France and the United Kingdom’, National Institute Economic Review, No. 133, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ark, B. van(1990c), ‘Comparative levels of manufacturing productivity in postwar Europe: measurement and comparisons’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, November.Google Scholar
Ark, B. van (1993), ‘The ICOP approach: its implications and applicability’, in: Szirmai, A., Ark, B. van and Pilat, D. (eds.), Explaining Economic Growth, North Holland, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bacon, R.W., and Eltis, W.A., (1974), The Age of US and UK Machinery, NEDO.Google Scholar
Blades, D.W., (1989,1991), ‘Capital measurement in OECD countries: an overview’, paper presented at International Seminar on Science, Technology and Economic Growth, June 1989. In revised form published in: Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Davies, S. and Caves, R.E. (1987), Britain's Productivity Gap, NIESR, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1989), Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry—An Evaluation and an Alternative, Brookings Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Frankel, M. (1957), British and American Manufacturing Productivity, Urbana, University of Illnois.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.J. and Baily, M.N., ‘Measurement issues and the productivity slowdown in five major industrial countries’, in: Oecd, Technology and Productivity: the Challenge for Economic Policy, Paris, pp. 187206.Google Scholar
Krijnse Locker, H. and Faerber, H.D. (1984), ‘On the estimation of Purchasing Power Parities on the basic heading level’, The Review of Income and Wealth, Series 30, No. 2, June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. and Ark, B. van (1988), ‘Comparisons of real output in manufacturing’, Policy, Planning and Research Working Papers, WPS5, World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Mishel, L. (1988), Manufacturing Numbers: How Inaccurate Statistics Conceal US Industrial Decline, Economic Policy Institute, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (1992), ‘Productivity levels in British and German manufacturing industry’, National Institute Economic Review, February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, D. and Bombach, G. (1959), A Comparison of National Output and Productivity, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Pilat, D. and Ark, B. van (1991), ‘Productivity Leadership in Manufacturing, Germany, Japan and the United States, 1973-89’, Research Memorandum, no. 456, Institute of Economic Research, Groningen.Google Scholar
Prais, S.J. (1981), Productivity and Industrial Structure, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rostas, V. (1943), ‘Industrial production, productivity and distribution in Britain, Germany and the United States’, Economic Journal, April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostas, V. (1948), Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and Catron, B. (1990), ‘An experimental price index for the computer industry’, Monthly Labor Review, October, pp. 1624.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D., Hitchens, D.W.W.N. and Davies, S. (1982), International Industrial Productivity, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1985), ‘Changes in comparative Anglo-American productivity in manufacturing industries’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 101, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London.Google Scholar
Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1988), ‘A new set of international comparisons of real product and price levels, estimates for 130 countries, 1950-85’, The Review of Income and Wealth, Series 34, No. 1, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991), ‘The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-88’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CVI, No. 2, May.Google Scholar
Szilagyi, G. (1984), ‘Updating procedures of international comparison results’, The Review of Income and Wealth, Series 30, No. 2, June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar