Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T17:03:07.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Business Start-Up Support for Young People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Nigel Meager ,
Peter Bates  and
Marc Cowling
Nigel Meager
Affiliation:
Institute for Employment Studies
Marc Cowling
Affiliation:
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article describes some evaluation findings from a longitudinal study of young people receiving business start-up assistance, through the Prince's Trust (with financial support from the Government). Unusually for evaluations of self-employment schemes, it focuses not solely on issues of deadweight and business survival, but also looks at the impact of programme participation on the subsequent labour market outcomes of participants. It uses a matched comparison group methodology to model programme impact, and finds no statistical evidence that supported entry to self-employment has an impact on participants' subsequent ‘employability’. After controlling for other factors, those who leave the programme are no more likely than those in the comparison group to be in employment, and if in employment their earnings are no higher than those in the comparison group.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 186 , October 2003 , pp. 59 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryson, A., Dorsett, R. and Purdon, S. (2002), The Use of Propensity Score Matching in the Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies, DWP, Research Working Paper no. 3, London, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Cressy, R. (2002), ‘Funding gaps: a symposium’, The Economic Journal, February.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (1979), ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, 47, pp. 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. and Smith, J. (1996), ‘Experimental and non-experimental evalaution’, in Schmid, G., O'Reilly, J. and Schömann, K. (eds), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Metcalf, H. (1988), Self-Employment for the Unemployed: the Role of Public Policy, DfEE Research Report RR47, London, Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
Meager, N. (1996), ‘From unemployment to self-employment: labour market policies for business start-up’, in Schmid, G., O'Reilly, J. and Schömann, K. (eds), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Meager, N., Cowling, M. and Bates, P. (2003), Business Start-up Support for Young People Delivered by The Prince's Trust A Comparative Study of Labour Market Outcomes, DWP Research Report no 184, London, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Payne, J., Lissenburgh, S., White, M. and Payne, C. (1996), Employment Training and Employment Action: An Evaluation by the Matched Comparison Method, DfEE Research Series no. 74, Sheffield, Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
Purdon, S. (2002), Estimating the Impact of Labour Market Programmes, DWP, Research Working Paper no. 3, London, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, London, Routledge.Google Scholar