Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:05:25.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Do Comparisons Of The Last Two Economic Recoveries Tell Us About The UK Labour Market?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Julian Morgan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are signs that the UK labour market has behaved differently in the most recent economic recovery. After the end of the recession in 1992 unemployment began to fall much earlier than expected, whilst wage and price inflation remained very low. Chart 1 plots unemployment and real wages in the first three years of the last two recoveries. In both cases unemployment rose in the first year of the recovery but thereafter the performance in the 1990s is much better. In the second year, unemployment began to fall significantly, much earlier than it had in the 1980s recovery. Three years after the low point in output the rate of unemployment was around 8½ per cent, 2½ per cent below the level pertaining at the equivalent point in the last cycle. At the same time real wages have shown little growth benefits compared with 4 per cent growth in the 1980s recovery.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 156 , May 1996 , pp. 80 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

This note utilises some material from a project carried out for the Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). However the views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the DfEE. I am grateful to Martin Weale, Ray Barrell and Nigel Pain for helpful comments and David Poulizac for research assistance.

References

Abraham, K.G. and Houseman, S.N. (1994), ‘Does employment protection inhibit labor market flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France and Belgium’, in Blank, R. (ed), Social Protection Versus Economic Flexibility, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. & Morgan, J. (1996), ‘International comparisons of labour market responses to economic recoveries’, Report to the Department for Education and Employment, mimeo March 1996.Google Scholar
Barrell, Morgan, Sefton & in't Veld (1994), ‘The cyclical adjustment of budget balances’, National Institute Report no.8.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Morgan, J. & Pain, N. (1995), ‘Employment, inequality and flexibility: a comparative study of labour markets in North America and Europe’, paper given at the ESRC Macroeconomic Modelling Bureau Seminar, University of Warwick, July.Google Scholar
Beatson, M. (1995), Labour Market Flexibility, Employment Department Research Series no. 48.Google Scholar
Butcher, S. & Hart, D. (1995), ‘An analysis of working time 1979-1994’, Employment Gazette, May.Google Scholar
Centraal Planbureau (1995), ‘Replacement rates: A transatlantic view’, Working Paper no. 80.Google Scholar
Commission (1995), ‘Performance of the European Union labour market: results of an ad hoc labour market survey covering employers and employees’, European Economy, no. 3.Google Scholar
Cso (1995a), Labour Market Trends, September.Google Scholar
Cso (1995b), Labour Market Trends, December.Google Scholar
Employment Department (1995), Employment Gazette, June, Table 7.22, p. 574.Google Scholar
Elmeskov, J. (1993), ‘High and persistent unemployment: assessment of the problem and its causes’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper no. 132, Paris.Google Scholar
Golden, L. (1990), ‘The insensitive workweek: trends and determinants of adjustment in average hours’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 13, no.1, Fall, pp.79–110.10.1080/01603477.1990.11489833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, W.J. (1988), ‘Education and demographics: how do they affect unemployment rates?’, Monthly Labour Review, January 1988, pp.3–9.Google Scholar
Mason, G. (1996), ‘Graduate utilisation in British industry: the initial impact of mass higher education’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 156, May.10.1177/002795019615600108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minford, P. and Riley, J. (1994) ‘The UK labour market: micro rigidities and macro obstructions’, in Barrell, R. (ed) The UK Labour Market: comparative aspects and institutional developments, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myall, J. (1995), ‘The new hours worked series’, in CSO Labour Market Trends, December.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. (1996), ‘Structural change in European labour markets’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 155, pp. 81–89.10.1177/002795019615500105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oecd (1995), Economic Survey: United Kingdom, July, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Oecd (1995a), Quarterly National Accounts, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Oecd (1995b), Labour Force Statistics 1973-93, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Oecd (1995c), OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Oecd (1995d), The Jobs Study, Evidence and Explanations Part II: The Adjustment Potential of the Labour Market, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Perry, K. (1996), ‘Measuring employment: comparison of official sources’, Labour Market Trends, January, pp.19–27.Google Scholar
Young, G. (1996), ‘The UK economy’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 155, pp.7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar