Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:06:41.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Young's Modulus, Yield Strength and Fracture Strength of Microelements Determined by Tensile Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Greek  and
F. Ericson
S. Greek
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden, staffan.greek@angstrom.uu.se
F. Ericson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden, staffan.greek@angstrom.uu.se
Get access

Abstract

Some mechanical properties of thin film microelements, e.g. fracture strength, depend on the manufacturing process, the load application as well as on size and shape of the microelements. Hence, the test structures that are used to determine mechanical properties should have dimensions of the same order of magnitude as an application structure, i.e. microelements must be used to accurately characterise MEMS. The fabrication of test structures must be realised in the same process as an intended application in order to give accurate results. Microelements are easily viewed in an SEM, but to be handled and tested in situ a micromanipulator was developed. Test structures were designed as released beams fixed to the substrate at one end, with a ring at the other. A high-precision testing unit was mounted on the micromanipulator next to the test structures. In the SEM, the testing unit was manoeuvred to grip the ring of the test structure beam and a tensile test of the beam was then executed. From the test data Young's modulus and fracture strength of polysilicon and single crystalline silicon were evaluated. Relative measurement of test structures with different beam lengths enabled Young's modulus to be evaluated with an accuracy of ±5%. Young's modulus was determined to 172±7 GPa for polysilicon and 142±9 GPa for single crystalline silicon in the <100> direction. The fracture surfaces were examined and compared. Young's modulus, yield strength and fracture strength of microelements made from electroplated nickel and nickel-iron alloy were also measured. Young's modulus was evaluated to 231±12 GPa for nickel and 155±8 GPa for nickel-iron alloy composed of 72 at% nickel and 28 at% iron.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 518: Symposium N – Microelectromechanical Structures for Materials Research , 1998 , 51
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Greek, S., Ericson, F., Johansson, S., Schweitz, J.-Å., Thin Solid Films 292, 247 (1997).Google Scholar
2 Offenberg, M., Laermer, F., Elsner, B., Muenzel, H., Reithmuller, W., Digest of Techn. Papers, The 8th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Stockholm, Sweden, 1, 589 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Gobet, J., Cardot, F., Bergqvist, J., Rudolf, F., J. Micromech. Microeng. 3, 123 (1993)Google Scholar
4 Greek, S. and Johansson, S. in Micromachined Devices and Components III (SPIE proc. 3224, Bellingham, Washington, 1997) pp. 344–351.Google Scholar
5 Dual, J., Mazza, E., Schiltges, G., Schlums, D. in Microlithography and Metrology in MIcromachining III, (SPIE proc. 3225, Bellingham, Washington, 1997) pp. 12–22.Google Scholar
6 Simmons, G. and Wang, H., Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties-A Handbook, 2nd ed. (The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, 1971).Google Scholar
7 Sharpe, W.N., Yuan, Bin, Vaidyanathan, R., Edwards, R.L., Proceedings IEEE. The Tenth Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots (IEEE, New York, NY, 1997) pp. 424–429.Google Scholar
8 Ericson, F. and Schweitz, J.-Å., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5840 (1990).Google Scholar
9 Safranek, W.H., The Properties of Electrodeposited Metals and Alloys, (Elsevier, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
10 Weil, R. in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V edited by Baker, S.P., Ross, C.A., Townsend, P.H., Volkert, C.A. and Borgesen, P. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, 1995) pp. 119–130.Google Scholar