Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T17:22:14.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffraction Studies of Annealed SiGe/Si SLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Walter P. Lowe
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill, NJ 07974
R. A. Macharrie
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. C. Bean
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We have done x-ray diffraction to study the affect of annealing on a SiGe/Si strained-layer superlattice (SLS). The post anneal spatial distribution of the Ge and Si atoms within the alloy layer is of particular interest. X-ray data taken from an annealed sample along the superlattice direction (100) show two sharp and well separated superlattice envelope functions. In contrast to the unannealed sample, and what would be a typical scattering spectra for a superlattice, the envelopes bisect the position of the unannealed sample's envelope function. The position of the envelope function is related to the tetragonal distortion εT in the SiGe alloy layers. The two separate envelopes (α and β) show that the SiGe alloy (100) planes have divided themselves into two groups with different interplanar spacings after the anneal. Each group with a tetragonal distortion such that and where εT is the tetragonal distortion in the unannealed sample. This is strong evidence for coherent phase separation perpendicular to the growth direction, along the SiGe alloy layer. In another investigation a search of reciprocal space for the 2 × 2 {… SiSiGeGe…} (111) chemically ordered state showed no evidence for the existence of such an ordered state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Martins, J. L. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1400 (1986).Google Scholar
[2] Flynn, C. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 599 (1986)Google Scholar
[3] Ciraci, S. and Batra, I. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2114 (1987)Google Scholar
[4] Tsao, J. Y., Dodson, B. W., Picraux, S. T. and Cornelison, D. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2445 (1987).Google Scholar
[5] Bean, J. C. and Sadowski, E. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 137 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Ourmazd, A. and Bean, J. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 765 (1985).Google Scholar
[7] Hull, R., Bean, J. C., Gibson, J. M., Marcantonio, K. J., Fiory, A. T. and Nakahara, S., in Layered Structures, Epitaxy, and Interfaces, edited by Gibson, J. M. and Dawson, L. R., MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 37 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh; PA, 1985), p. 261.Google Scholar
[8] Perovic, D. D., Weatherly, G. C. and Houghton, D. C., to appear in the proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on “Advanced Characterization of Semiconductor Materials” held in Bristol, England Sept. 1988.Google Scholar
[9] Spaepen, F., in Layered Structures, Epitaxy, and Interfaces, edited by Gibson, J. M. and Dawson, L. R., MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 37 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh; PA, 1985), p. 295.Google Scholar