Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:44:39.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What really happens to the “vanishing overpack”?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2012

I. G. McKinley ,
F. B. Neall ,
E. M. Scourse  and
H. Kawamura
I. G. McKinley
Affiliation:
MCM. Baden, Switzerland
F. B. Neall
Affiliation:
Neall Consulting, Kendal, UK
E. M. Scourse
Affiliation:
MCM. Baden, Switzerland
H. Kawamura
Affiliation:
Obayashi, Tokyo, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Concepts for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent fuel (SF) in several countries include a massive steel overpack within a bentonite buffer. In past conservative safety assessments to demonstrate feasibility of geological disposal, overpacks are assumed to provide complete containment for a given lifetime, after which all fail simultaneously. After failure, they are ignored as physical barriers to radionuclide transport. In order to compare different repository designs for specific sites, however, a more realistic treatment of overpack failure and its subsequent behaviour is needed. In addition to arguing for much longer lifetimes before mechanical failure and a distribution of overpack failure times, such assessment indicates that the presence of the failed overpack greatly constrains radionuclide release from the waste matrix and subsequent migration through the engineered barrier system. It also emphasises the key role of the bentonite buffer and the need to be able to assure its performance over relevant timescales.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-o58
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. JNC, 2000, JNC-TN1410-2000-01.Google Scholar
2. Nagra, 2002, Nagra NTB 02–05.Google Scholar
3. Baldwin, T., Chapman, N.A., Neall, F.B.. NDA Report 5570 (2008)Google Scholar
4. McKinley, I.G.. Nagra NTB 84–48 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Makino, H., Umeki, H., Takase, H., McKinley, I.G., Proc. Int. Conf. High Level Radioactive Waste Management, 25-31 (2011).Google Scholar
6. Kawamura, H., McKinley, I.G., Proc. ESDRED workshop, Andra, 9-1 – 9-10 (2008).Google Scholar
7. King, F., NWMO TR 2007-01 (2007).Google Scholar
8. McKinley, I. G., Alexander, W.R., Kickmaier, W., Neall, F.B., , F.B., Posiva WR 2004-25 / NUMO TR-04-05, 86-90 (2004)Google Scholar
9. Wersin, P., Birgesson, M., Olsson, S., Karnland, O., Snellman, M., Posiva Report 2007-11 (2007).Google Scholar