Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:55:48.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wear of Ductile-Phase Toughened NiAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

F.E. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
I. Baker
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
B.J. Johnson
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to study the effect of ductile phases on the wear of brittle intermetallic compounds. The material system of interest was NiAl with an incorporated ductile Fe phase. Three different compositions were studied: Fe10Ni45Al45, Fe30Ni35Al35, and Fe44Ni28Al28, each after two different heat treatments. Their wear behavior in unlubricated sliding against zirconia was investigated using pin-on-disk tests at room temperature in air. Hardness and fracture toughness tests were run for the same materials to clarify the relationship between wear and deformation. Results for the ductile-phase toughened materials were compared with results of similar tests for unalloyed NiAl.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV”, Proc. MRS, 288 (1993).Google Scholar
2. “Intermetallic Compounds-Structure and Properties”, Proc. Int. Symp. JIMIS-6, Japan Inst. Met. (1991).Google Scholar
3. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Nippon Kinzoku Takkaishi 43, 1190 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Liu, C.T., White, C.L. and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 33, 213 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Guha, S., Munroe, P. and Baker, I., Scripta Metallurgica 23, 897 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Guha, S., Munroe, P. R. and Baker, I., Materials Science and Engineering, A131, 27 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Venkateswara Rao, K.T., Odette, G.R. and Ritchie, R.O., Acta Metall. 39, (1991).Google Scholar
8. Lewandowski, J.J., Dimiduk, D., Kerr, W. and Mendiratta, M.G., Proc. MRS 120, 103 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Huang, S. C., Field, R. D., and Krueger, D. D., Metall. Trans. A, 21A, 959 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Flinn, B.D., Ruhle, M. and Evans, A.G., Acta Metall., 39, 3001 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Rigney, J.D. et al., Proc. MRS 213, 1001 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Blau, P.J. and DeVore, C.E., Wear, 149, 27 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Rao Bonda, N. and Rigney, D.A., Proc. MRS, 132 , 585 (1989).Google Scholar
14. Johnson, B.J., Kennedy, F.E. and Baker, I., Wear, in press (1995).Google Scholar
15. Jung, I. and Sauthoff, G., Z. Metallkde., 80, 484 (1989).Google Scholar
16. Metals Handbook, 8th. ed., v. 8, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1976.Google Scholar
17. Kennedy, F.E. and Voss, D.A., in Wear of Materials, 1979. ASME, NY, p89.Google Scholar
18. Ludema, K.C., in Metals Handbook, 10th ed., v. 18, ASM Int’l., 1992, p.236 Google Scholar
19. Kennedy, F. E., Hauck, K. E., and Grotelueschen, L. P., in Mechanisms and Surface Distress, edited by Dowson, D., et al., Butterworths, London, 1986, p67.Google Scholar