Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:15:34.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in the Refractive Index of the Near-Surface Region of Low Energy Hydrogen Ion Bombarded Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. B. Pettit
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, P. O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185
J. K. G. Panitz
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, P. O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

Using ellipsometric analysis, the complex index of refraction of lowenergy, hydrogen ion bombarded, [100] single-crystal silicon was measured as a function of distance from the bombarded surface. The bombardment conditions were a 1600 eV hydrogen beam produced by a Kaufman ion source, 1.4 mA/cm2 flux, 2 × 1018 ions/cm2 fluence and 275°C bulk silicon temperature. These conditions are comparable to the conditions generally reported to result in a substantial increase in the electrical conductivity of polycrystalline silicon solar cell material. The results of this study indicate that the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index of the ion bombarded surface region approach that of the unbombarded substrate at a depth of 50 nm. The refractive index of about the first 10 nm of ion bombarded material is strongly dependent on the bombardment conditions. Variations in the imaginary part of the refractive index indicate that approximately 10% of incident radiation is absorbed by the first 50 nm of modified material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sharp, D. J., Panitz, J. K. G. and Seager, C. H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 33 (1984) 179.Google Scholar
2. Se~ger, C. H., Sharp, D. J. and Panitz, J. K. G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20 (1982) 430.Google Scholar
3. Ginley, D. S. and Haaland, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 39 (1981) 271.Google Scholar
4. Panitz, J. K. G., Sharp, D. J. and Seager, C. H., Thin Solid Films 111 (1984) 277.Google Scholar
5. Panitz, J. K. G., Sharp, D. J. and Hills, C. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3 (1985) 1.Google Scholar
6. Sharp, D. J., Panitz, J. K. G., and Mattox, D. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16 (1979) 1879.Google Scholar
7. McCrackin, F. L., NBS Technical Note 479 (Apr., 1969).Google Scholar
8. Przyborski, W., Roed, J., Lippert, J., and Sarholt-Kristensen, L., Radiation Effects 1 (1969) 33.Google Scholar
9. Dr.Eastman, D. R. P., Perkin Elmer Corp., Wilton, CT 06897, personal communication.Google Scholar
10. Phillip, H. R. and Taft, E. A., Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) 37.Google Scholar
11. Born, M. and Wolf, E., Principles of Optics, Pergamon Press, New York (1975), Chapter 13.Google Scholar
12. Pettit, R. B. and Panitz, J K. G., Thin Solid Films (submitted).Google Scholar