Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T10:57:06.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Variational Solution of the Thermoelectric Transport Properties of Two-Component Nanocomposite Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Patrick L. Garrity  and
Kevin L. Stokes
Patrick L. Garrity
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, Department of Physics, University of New Orleans, Lakefront New Orleans, LA 70148, U.S.A.
Kevin L. Stokes
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, Department of Physics, University of New Orleans, Lakefront New Orleans, LA 70148, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The successful fabrication of a nanocomposite in bulk form consisting of a randomly oriented assembly of nanoscale sized core-shell particles has required an increased understanding of the theoretical aspects of the thermoelectric transport properties. Our particular nanocomposite consists of a nanorod core in 1D quantum confinement coated with an outer conducting polymer shell. Upon fabrication of the bulk composite, these nanorods are embedded within a three-dimensional conducting polymer matrix. We address the nanorod thermoelectric components by assuming a single parabolic band within the one-dimension density of states. Both elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons or holes is accommodated by solving the variational form of the Boltzmann transport equation. An altered lattice thermal conductivity for the confined nanorods is calculated separately to account for boundary scattering that is important in low dimension structures. Exact expressions for the bulk effective electrical and thermal conductivities, Seebeck coefficient and figure of merit are then obtained through the field decoupling transformation, which is a special case of two-component composites. Our method is easily generalized to any two component composite of spherical or cylindrical microstructure and is independent of the materials bulk geometry. The results similarly apply to one, two or three dimensional transport regimes with or without quantum confinement merely by solving the appropriate fundamental transport equations for each constituent material. Comparison to experimental data is then presented which helps validate the nanocomposite theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 793: Symposium S – Thermoelectric Materials 2003 - Research and Applications , 2003 , S5.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gaponik, N. P., Talapin, D. V., Rogach, A. L., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1, 1787 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Hicks, L. D., Dresselhaus, M. S., Phys. Rev. B, 47, 16 631 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Broido, D. A., Reinecke, T. L., Phys. Rev. B, 51, 13 797 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Garrity, P. L., Thermoelectric Properties of Bismuth Sulfide and Bismuth Telluride Nanocomposites, Master of Science Thesis, University of New Orleans, December 2003.Google Scholar
5. Leonard, W. F., Martin, T. L., Electronic Structure and Transport Properties of Crystals, (Robt. E. Krieger Pub. Co., New York, 1980) p. 347.Google Scholar
6. Durczewski, K., Ausloos, M., Phys. Rev. B, 61, 5303 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Ausloos, M., Durczewski, K., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 15, 237 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Butcher, P., March, N. H., Tosi, M. P., Physics of Low Dimensional Structures, (Plenum Press New York, 1993) p. 91.Google Scholar
9. Callaway, S., Phys. Rev., 113, 1046 (1959).Google Scholar
10. Wang, Z. H., Li, C., Scherr, E. M., MacDiarmid, A. G., Epstein, A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 1745 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Mott, N. F., Davies, E. A., Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979) p. 145.Google Scholar
12. Milgrom, M., Shtrikman, S., Phys. Rev. A, 40, 1568 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Bergman, D. J., Levy, O., J. Appl. Phys., 70, 6821 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Bergman, D. J., Fel, L. G., J. Appl. Phys., 85, 8205 (1999).Google Scholar
15. Baoxing, C., Uher, C., Iordanidis, L., Kanatzidis, M. G., Chem. Mat., 9, 1655 (1997).Google Scholar
16. Madelung, O., Semiconductors – Basic Data, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York) p. 206.Google Scholar