Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:36:56.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uv Laser-Initiated Deposition of Al2O3 Films: The Effect of Surface Irradiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

T. F. Deutsch ,
D. J. Silversmith  and
R. W. Mountain
T. F. Deutsch
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLexington, Massachusetts 02173–0073
D. J. Silversmith
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLexington, Massachusetts 02173–0073
R. W. Mountain
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLexington, Massachusetts 02173–0073
Get access

Abstract

The effects of 193 and 248 nm UV surface irradiation on the properties of Al2O3 films produced by UV laser-initiated deposition have been investigated using ellipsometry and electrical measurements. The UV irradiated region shows a higher refractive index than the unirradiated regions, indicating that densification has occurred. Energy fluences as low as 1 mJ/cm2, too low to cause significant transient heating, produce measurable effects. The results suggest that UV irradiation may be used to obtain lower deposition temperatures in a variety of deposition systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 29: Symposium I – Laser-Controlled Chemical Processing of Surfaces , 1983 , 67
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Solanki, R., Ritchie, W. H. and Collins, G. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 454 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Boyer, P. K., Moore, C. A., Solanki, R., Ritchie, W. K., Roche, G. A. and Collins, G. J. in Laser Diagnostics and Photochemical Processing for Semiconductor Devices, edited by Osgood, R. M. Jr., Brueck, S. R. J., and Schlossberg, H. R., (North-Holland, New York, 1983), p. 119.Google Scholar
3. Deutsch, T. F., Silversmith, D. J. and Mountain, R. W., p. 129.Google Scholar
4. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th ed., edited by Weast, R. C., (The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, Ohio, 1973), p. B–68.Google Scholar
5. Duffy, M. T. and Kern, W., RCA Review 31, 754 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Katto, H. and Koga, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 1619 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Gray, P. V., Proc. IEEE 57, 1543 (1969).Google Scholar
8. Ehle, R. S., Balega, B. J. and Katz, W., J. Electron. Mater. 12, 587 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Ehrlich, D. J., Osgood, R. M. Jr., and Deutsch, T. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 946 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ehrlich, G., CRC Crit. Rev. Solid-State Mat. Sci. 10, 391 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Greene, J. E., CRC Crit. Rev. Solid-State Mat. Sci. 11, 47 (1983).Google Scholar