Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T19:44:16.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Isostatic Pressing Techniques to Mold Uhmwpe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Joel Higgins  and
David Schroeder
Joel Higgins
Affiliation:
Biomet, Inc., Airport Industrial Park, Warsaw, Indiana 46580
David Schroeder
Affiliation:
Biomet, Inc., Airport Industrial Park, Warsaw, Indiana 46580
Get access

Extract

Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) has been and is currently the standard for bearing material used in the orthopedic industry. The components are produced using a variety of manufacturing methods, many of which can have an effect on the longevity and performance of the device. Recently there has been extensive research into the causes of loosening of orthopedic devices. One area that has been targeted as a cause for loosening is reactions to particulate debris from the bearing surfaces of these appliances. As biological reactions to particulate become better understood, there has been an increased emphasis on the quality of the UHMWPE forms used for orthopedic bearing surfaces. Due to this increased awareness, various manufacturing and quality control improvements have been made throughout the industry.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 394: Symposium Z – Polymers in Medicine and Pharmacy , 1995 , 175
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stein, Harvey L., Engineered Materials Handbook, pp. 167–171, Vol. 2, Engineering Plastics, ASM International, Materials Park, OK, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Collier, J.P., Mayor, M.B., Dauphinais, L.D., Jensen, R.E., Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, Number 261, December 1990.Google Scholar
3. Blunn, G.W., Joshi, A.B., Lifley, P.A., Engelbrecht, E., Ryd, L., Lidgren, L., Hardinge, K., Nieder, E.and Walker, P.S., Acta Orthop Scand, Vol.63, No. 3, 1992, pgs. 247–255. Google Scholar
4. Goodman, S. and Lidgren, L., Acta Orthop Scand, Vol.63, No. 3, 1992, pgs. 358–364. Google Scholar
5. Edelman, B. and Wright, T.M., Orthopedics Today, April 1992, pg. 3. Google Scholar
6. Eyerer, P. and Kurth, M., “Material Improvements of UHMWPE”, ANTEC 1986 Conference Proc. - Society of Plastics Engineers 44th Annual Technical Conference, April 28-May 1, 1986, Boston, MA. Google Scholar
7. Landy, M.M. and Walker, P.S., The Journal of Arthoplasty, October 1988 Supplement, pgs. S73–S85.Google Scholar
8. Rimnac, C.M., Klein, R.W., Burstein, A.H. and Wright, T.M., “In Vitro Chemical and Mechanical Degradation of UHMWPE: Three Month Results”, The 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, April 28-May 2, 1993, Birmingham, AL. Google Scholar
9. Price, P.E. and Kohler, S.P., Metals Handbook, 9th ed., Vol.7, pp. 419–450, Powder Metallurgy, 1988, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio. Google Scholar