Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:25:45.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Metastable Defect Creation in CIGS by Detailed Device Modeling and Measurements on Bifacial Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jin Woo Lee ,
David Berney Needleman ,
William N. Shafarman  and
J. David Cohen
Jin Woo Lee
Affiliation:
jlee5@uoregon.edu, University of Oregon, Physics, 824 Pool st. #15, Eugene, OR, 97401, United States, 541-255-6668
David Berney Needleman
Affiliation:
dberneyn@uoregon.edu, University of Oregon, Physics, Eugene, OR, 97403, United States
William N. Shafarman
Affiliation:
wns@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Institute of Energy Conversion, Newark, DE, 19716, United States
J. David Cohen
Affiliation:
dcohen@uoregon.edu, University of Oregon, Physics, Eugene, OR, 97403, United States
Get access

Abstract

We present a compensated donor-acceptor conversion model to explain the metastable light-induced changes in the performance of CIGS solar cells. In this model, compensating donors plays the role of recombination channel. Modeling using SCAPS-1D yielded reasonable fits to the I-V curves in different metastable states, matching the experimentally observed decreases in short circuit current and fill factor as well as the lack of change in open circuit voltage. Comparison of the experimental results from bifacial solar cells and SCAPS simulations strongly supports the compensated donor-acceptor conversion model both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Keywords

photovoltaicMotransparent conductor
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1012: Symposium Y – Thin-Film Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics-2007 , 2007 , 1012-Y04-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lee, J., Heath, J.T., Cohen, J.D., and Shafarman, W.N., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 865, 2005, pp. 373–378.Google Scholar
2. Lany, S. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 72, 2005, 035215.Google Scholar
3. Lany, S. and Zunger, A., J. Appl. Phys. 100, 2006, 113725.Google Scholar
4. Lee, J., Heath, J.T., Cohen, J. D. and Shafarman, W.N., Proc. of 4th WCPEC, 2006, in press.Google Scholar
5. Burgelman, M., Nollet, P., and Degrave, S., Thin Solid Films 361, 2000, pp. 527–532.Google Scholar
6. Pudov, A.O., Kanevce, A., Al-Thani, H. A., Sites, J. R. and Hasoon, F. S., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 2005, 064901.Google Scholar
7. Pudov, A.O., Sites, J.R., Contreras, M.A., Nakada, T. and Schock, H.-W., Thin Solid Films 480-481, 2005, pp. 273–278.Google Scholar
8. Heath, J.T., Cohen, J.D., Shafarman, W.N., Liao, D.X., and Rockett, A.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2002, 4540.Google Scholar
9. Rau, U., Weinert, K., N, Q., Dguyen, Mamor, M., Hanna, G, Jasenek, A., and Schock, H.W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 668, 2001, art. H9.1.Google Scholar
10. Gloeckler, M., Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University, 2005.Google Scholar
11. Lee, J.W., Cohen, J. D. and Shafarman, W.N., Thin Solid Films 480-481, 2005, pp. 336–340.Google Scholar
12. Heath, J.T., Cohen, J.D., and Shafarman, W.N., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2004, pp. 1000–1002.Google Scholar
13. Hegedus, S. S. and Shafarman, W.N., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 12, 2004, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar