Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T02:25:34.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-Stage Crystallization Of Poly (Ether Ether Ketone) And Its Blends With Poly (Ether Imide)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Hsin-Lung Chen
Affiliation:
Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Roger S. Porter
Affiliation:
Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Get access

Abstract

Thermal Mechanical analysis (TMA) has been used to study the crystallization behavior of poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and its blends with poly (ether imide) (PEI). The two crystallization stages of PEEK are clearly distinguished by measuring the variation of film thickness with time during isothermal crystallization. Upon blending with PEI, the distinction of the two PEEK crystallization stages becomes obscure. This is attributed to the depressions in both nucleation density and spherulite growth rate upon blending with PEI.

An Avrami analysis, Modified by considering both primary and secondary crystallization, is used to extract the respective kinetic behavior of these two crystallization stages. The results indicate that the secondary crystallization proceeded slower than the primary crystallization in the diffusion-controlled crystallization region. On the other hand, these two crystallization stages proceeded at comparable rate in the thermodynamically-controlled crystallization region. It is also found in the diffusion-controlled crystallization that blending with PEI induced a larger depression in the secondary crystallization rate than in the primary crystallization rate. Explanations for these observations are proposed and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Blundell, D. J. and Osborn, B. N., Polymer 24, 953 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Bassett, D. C., Olley, R. H., AI Raheil, I. A. M., Polymer 29, 1745 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Marand, H. and Prasad, A., Macromolecules 25, 1731 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Lovinger, A. J., Hudson, S. D., and Davis, D. D., Macromolecules 25, 1752 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Cheng, S. Z. D., Cao, M.-Y., and Wunderlich, B., Macromolecules 19, 1868 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Lee, Y. and Porter, R. S., Macromolecules 20, 1336 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Lee, Y., Porter, R. S., and Lin, J. S., Macromolecules 22, 1756 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Harris, J. E. and Robeson, L. M., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 35, 1877 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Grevecoeur, G. and Groeninckx, G., Macromolecules 24, 1190 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Hudson, S. D., Davis, D. D., and Lovinger, A. J., Macromolecules 25, 1759 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Chen, H.-L. and Porter, R. S., Polym. Eng. Sci. 32, 1870 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Chen, H.-L. and Porter, R. S., Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 31, 1845 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Price, F. P.J., Polym. Sci., Part A 3, 3079 (1965).Google Scholar
14. Chen, H.-L. and Porter, R. S., Polymer 34, 4576 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Day, M., Deslandes, Y., Roovers, J., and Suprunchuk, T., Polymer 32, 1258 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Hsiao, B., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 31, 237 (1993).Google Scholar