Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:43:23.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tissue Engineering of Tendon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Y. Caoa
Affiliation:
Department. of Anesthesia, Laboratory for Tissue Engineering, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01655
J. P. Vacanti
Affiliation:
Department. of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02115
P. X. Ma
Affiliation:
Department. of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
C. Ibarra
Affiliation:
Department. of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02115
K.T. Paige
Affiliation:
Department. of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02115
J. Upton
Affiliation:
Department. of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02115
R. Langer
Affiliation:
Department. of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
C. A. Vacanti
Affiliation:
Department. of Anesthesia, Laboratory for Tissue Engineering, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01655
Get access

Abstract

We studied the feasibility of creating new tissue engineered tendons, using bovine tendon fibroblasts (tenocytes) attached to synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds in athymic mice. Calffore- and hind-limbs were obtained from a local slaughterhouse within 6 hours of sacrifice. Tenocytes were isolated from the calf tendons. Cells were seeded onto an array of fibers composed of polymer (PGA) configured either as a random mesh of fibers, or as an array of parallel fibers. Fifty cell-polymer constructs were implanted subcutaneously in athymic mice and harvested at 3, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. Grossly, all excised specimens resembled the tendons from which the cells had been isolated. Histologic sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome showed cells arranged longitudinally within parallel collagen fibers in the periphery. Centrally, collagen fibers were more randomly arranged, although they seemed to attain a parallel arrangement of cells and fibers over time. By 10 weeks, specimens showed very similar histologic characteristics to normal tendon. Histologically, 12-week samples were virtually identical to normal tendon. When longitudinal polymer fibers seeded with cell had been implanted, the collagen fibers seen in the neo-tendons became organized at an earlier interval of time. Biomechanical tests demonstrated linear increase in tensile strength of the neo-tendons over time. Eight-week specimens showed 30% the tensile strength of normal tendon samples of similar size. By 12 weeks, tensile strength was already 57% that of normal bovine tendon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Forster, I. W., Rallis, Z. A, McKibbin, B, Jenkins, D. H. R. Biological reaction to carbon fiber implants: The formation and structure of a carbon-induced neotendon. Clin. Orthop; 131: 299307, 1978 Google Scholar
2. Jenkins, D. H. R., The repair of cruciate ligaments with flexible carbon fibre: A longer term study in the induction of new ligaments and of the fate of the implanted carbon. J Bone Joint Surg; 60B: 520–22, 1978 Google Scholar
3. Jenkins, D. H. R., et al. The role of flexible carbon fibre implants as tendon and ligament substitutes in clinical practice: A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg; 62 B: 497–99, 1980 Google Scholar
4. Tayton, K., et al. Long term effects of carbon fibre on soft tissues. J Bone Joint Surg; 64 B: 112–14, 1982 Google Scholar
5. Rushton, N, et al. The clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic findings after relpacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with carbon fibre. J Bone Joint Surg: 65 B: 308–9, 1983 Google Scholar
6. Ricci, J. L., Gona, A. G., Alexander, H. In vitro tendon cell growth rates on a synthetic fiber scaffold material and on standard culture plates. J Biomed Mat Res; 25(5): 651–66, 1991 Google Scholar
7. Demmer, P, Fowler, M, Marino, A. A. Use of carbon fibers in the reconstruction of knee ligaments. Clin Orthop; 271: 225–32; 1991 Google Scholar
8. Strum, G. M., Larson, R. L. Clinical experience and early results of carbon fiber augmentation of anterior cruciate reconstruction of the knee. Clin Orthop; 196: 124–38, 1985 Google Scholar
9. Irie, K., Kurosawa, H., Oda, H. Histological and biochemical analysis of the fibrous tissue induced by implantation of synthetic ligament (Dacron): an experimental study in a rat model. J Orthop Res: 10(6): 886–94, 1992 Google Scholar
10. Goldstein, J. D., Tria, A. J., Zawadsky, J. P., et al. Development of a reconstituted collagen tendon prosthesis. J Bone Surg; (8): 1183–91, 1989 Google Scholar
11. Kato, Y. P., Dunn, M. G., Zawadsky, J. P., et al. Regeneration of Achilles tendon prosthesis. Results of a one-year implantation study. J Bone Joint Surg; 73(4): 561–74,1991 Google Scholar
12. Milthorpe, B. K. Xenografts for tendon and ligament repair (Review). Biomaterials; 15(10): 745–52,1994.Google Scholar
13. Tauro, J. C., Parsons, J. R., Ricci, J., et al. Comparison of bovine collagen xenografts to autografts in the rabbit. Clin Orthop; 266: 271–84, 1991.Google Scholar
14. Conrad, E. U., Gretch, D. R., Obermeyer, K. R. Transmission of the hepatitis-C virus by tissue transplantation. J Bone and Joint Surg; 77A: 214–24, 1995.Google Scholar
15. Asselmeier, M. A., Caspari, R. B., Bottenfield, S. A review of allograft processing and sterilization techniques and their role in transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Sports Med 1993;21: 170–75.Google Scholar
16. Rasmussen, T. J., Feder, S. M., Butler, D. L., Noyes, F. R. The effects of 4 Mrad of gamma irradiation on the mechanical properties of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. Arthroscopy 1994; 10(2): 188–97.Google Scholar
17. Arnoczky, S. P., Tarvin, G. B., Marshall, J. L. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement using patellar tendon: an evaluation of grafts revascularization. J Bone Joint Surg; 64 A: 217–24, 1982.Google Scholar
18. Rougraff, B., Shelbourne, K. D., Gerth, P. K., et al. Arthroscopic and histologic analysis of human patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am. J Sports Med; 21(2): 277–84, 1993.Google Scholar
19. Bosch, U, Kasperczyk, W. J. The healing process after cruciate ligament repair in the sheep model. Orthopade; 22(6): 366–71, 1993.Google Scholar
20. Abe, S., Kurosaka, M., Iguchi, T., et al. Light and electron microscopic of remodeling and maturation process in aurogenous graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy; 9(4): 394405, 1993.Google Scholar
21. Lane, J. G., McFadden, P., Bowden, K., et al. The ligamentization process: a 4 year case study following ACL reconstruction with a semitendinous graft. Arthroscopy; 9(2): 149–53, 1993.Google Scholar
22. Kasperczyk, W. J., Bosch, U., Oestern, H. J., et al. Staging of patellar tendon autograft healing after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A biomechanical and histological study in a sheep model. Clin Orthop; 286: 271–82, 1993 Google Scholar
23. Vandenburgh, H. H., Swasdison, S., Karlisch, P. Computer-aided mechanogenesis of skeletal muscle organs from single cells in vitro. FASEB Journal; 5(13): 2860–7, 1991.Google Scholar
24. Langer, R., Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science; 260: 920926, 1993.Google Scholar
25. Vacanti, C. A., Cima, L., Radkowski, , et al. Tissue engineering of new cartilage in the shape of a human ear employing specially configured synthetic polymers seeded with chondrocytes. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings; 52: 367–73, 1992.Google Scholar
26. Vacanti, C. A., Langer, R., Schloo, B., et al. Synthetic biodegradable polymers seeded with chondrocytes provide a template for new cartilage formation in vivo. J Plastic Recon Surg; 88: 753–9, 1991.Google Scholar
27. Atala, A., Vacanti, J. P., Peters, C. A., et al. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J. Urol; 148: 658662, 1992.Google Scholar
28. Vacanti, C. A., Paige, K. T., Kim, W. S. Experimental tracheal replacement using tissue-engineered cartilage. J Pediatr Surg; 29: 201205, 1994.Google Scholar
29. Andrish, J. T., Woods, L. D. Dacron augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in dogs. Clin Orthop; 183: 298302, 1984.Google Scholar
30. Arnoczky, S. P., Warren, R. F., Minei, J. P. Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using a synthetic prosthesis - an evaluation of graft biology in the dog. Am J Sports Med; 14: 16, 1986.Google Scholar
31. Fujikawa, K. Clinical study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a scaffold type prosthetic ligament (Leeds-Keio). J Jpn Orthop Assoc; 63: 774788, 1989.Google Scholar
32. Jenkins, D. H. R., Forster, I. W., McKibben, B., Wales, Z. A. R. C. Induction of tendon and ligament formation by carbon implants. J Bone Joint Surg[Am]; 58: 10831088, 1976.Google Scholar
33. McPherson, G. k., Mendenhall, H. V., Gibbons, D. F., et al. Experimental mechanical and histological evaluation of the Kennedy ligament augmentation device. Clin Orthop; 196: 186195, 1985.Google Scholar
34. Weiss, A. B. Ligament replacement with an absorbable co-polymer carbon fiber scaffold. Early clinical experience. Clin Orthop; 196: 7786, 1985.Google Scholar
35. Klagsbrun, M., Method Enzymol 58, 560 (1979)Google Scholar