Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:47:50.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thin Film Material Parameters Derived from Full Field Nanometric Displacement Measurements in Non-uniform MEMS Geometries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jaime F. Cárdenas-García
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400746, Charlottesville, VA 22904, U.S.A.
Sungwoo Cho
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400746, Charlottesville, VA 22904, U.S.A.
Ioannis Chasiotis
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

MEMS-scale polycrystalline silicon 2 μm thin film specimens fabricated via the Multi User MEMS Processes (MUMPs) have been employed to obtain the non-uniform nanometric displacement fields in the vicinity of prefabricated circular and elliptical micron-sized perforations. For the hole diameter-to-specimen width ratios considered in this work, and for all practical purposes, the displacement solution for a hole in an infinite plate is applicable. This method requires the ability to reliably and repeatably acquire nanometer level displacements on freestanding thin films. These tensile tests were conducted by a custom microtensile tester with the aid of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and a special gripper that makes use of electrostatically assisted UV adhesion to handle and load miniature MEMS specimens. This non-conventional procedure for material parameter determination relies on Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to compare two AFM images, one before and one after specimen loading, and thus compute the nanometer level displacement fields (<50 nm global displacements) in 15×15-μm2 (or smaller) areas, with better than 2–3 nm resolution in displacements. By posing and solving a non-linear least squares inverse problem where, for known applied loads and measured displacement fields in an infinite plate with either a circular or an elliptical hole, it is possible to recover the elastic modulus (E). The main advantage of this approach is the full utilization of high-resolution displacement measurements over a specific specimen area, using only measurements acquired at one load level. Further statistical measurements of material properties may be obtained at varying load levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Johansson, J., Schweitz, J., Tenerz, L. and Tirén, J., J. of Appl. Phys., 63 (10), 4799 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., in Encyclopedia of Comprehensive Structural Integrity Vol. 8: Interfacial and Nanoscale Failure, edited by Gerberich, W. and Yang, W., (Elsevier Science, 2003) pp. 4187.Google Scholar
3. A.S.T.M., ASTM Standard E111–98, (ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1998).Google Scholar
4. A.S.T.M., ASTM Standard E132–97, (ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1998).Google Scholar
5. Sharpe, W.N., Yuan, B. and Vaidyanathan, R., Proc. of IEEE MEMS, Nagoya, Japan, 424 (1997).Google Scholar
6. LaVan, D.A., Tsuchiya, T., Coles, G., Knauss, W.G., Chasiotis, I., Read, D., ASTM STP 1413, (ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
7. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., Proc. of the SPIE 3512, pp. 6675, 1998.Google Scholar
8. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., Proc. of SPIE 4175, pp. 96103, 2000.Google Scholar
9. Chasiotis, I., Cho, S. W., Friedman, T.A. and Sullivan, J.P., Proc. of SEM, pp. 170175, 2003.Google Scholar
10. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., Exp. Mech. 42 (1), 51 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Cárdenas-García, J.F., Ekwaro-Osire, S. and Berg, J.M., Mech. Res. Comm. 28 (1), 13 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Saada, A.S., Elasticity: Theory and Applications, Pergamon Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
13. Sanford, R.J., Exp. Mech. 20, 192 (1980).Google Scholar
14. Sanford, R.J. and Dally, J.W., Eng. Fract. Mech. 11, 621 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., Proc. of the MRS 687, pp. B2.4.1–B2.4.6, (2002).Google Scholar
16. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., J. of the Mech. Phys. of Solids, 51, 1551 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Vendroux, G. and Knauss, W.G., Exp. Mech. 38 (2), 86 (1998).Google Scholar
18. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., Proc. of the MRS 657, pp. EE2.2.1–EE2.2.6 (2001).Google Scholar
19. Chasiotis, I. and Knauss, W.G., J. of the Mech. Phys. of Solids, 51, 1533 (2003).Google Scholar